summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/stdbool.in.h
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/stdbool.in.h')
-rw-r--r--lib/stdbool.in.h132
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/stdbool.in.h b/lib/stdbool.in.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ecf203
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/stdbool.in.h
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+/* Copyright (C) 2001-2003, 2006-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ Written by Bruno Haible <haible@clisp.cons.org>, 2001.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
+ any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#ifndef _GL_STDBOOL_H
+#define _GL_STDBOOL_H
+
+/* ISO C 99 <stdbool.h> for platforms that lack it. */
+
+/* Usage suggestions:
+
+ Programs that use <stdbool.h> should be aware of some limitations
+ and standards compliance issues.
+
+ Standards compliance:
+
+ - <stdbool.h> must be #included before 'bool', 'false', 'true'
+ can be used.
+
+ - You cannot assume that sizeof (bool) == 1.
+
+ - Programs should not undefine the macros bool, true, and false,
+ as C99 lists that as an "obsolescent feature".
+
+ Limitations of this substitute, when used in a C89 environment:
+
+ - <stdbool.h> must be #included before the '_Bool' type can be used.
+
+ - You cannot assume that _Bool is a typedef; it might be a macro.
+
+ - Bit-fields of type 'bool' are not supported. Portable code
+ should use 'unsigned int foo : 1;' rather than 'bool foo : 1;'.
+
+ - In C99, casts and automatic conversions to '_Bool' or 'bool' are
+ performed in such a way that every nonzero value gets converted
+ to 'true', and zero gets converted to 'false'. This doesn't work
+ with this substitute. With this substitute, only the values 0 and 1
+ give the expected result when converted to _Bool' or 'bool'.
+
+ - C99 allows the use of (_Bool)0.0 in constant expressions, but
+ this substitute cannot always provide this property.
+
+ Also, it is suggested that programs use 'bool' rather than '_Bool';
+ this isn't required, but 'bool' is more common. */
+
+
+/* 7.16. Boolean type and values */
+
+/* BeOS <sys/socket.h> already #defines false 0, true 1. We use the same
+ definitions below, but temporarily we have to #undef them. */
+#if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__
+# include <OS.h> /* defines bool but not _Bool */
+# undef false
+# undef true
+#endif
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+# define _Bool bool
+# define bool bool
+#else
+# if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__
+ /* A compiler known to have 'bool'. */
+ /* If the compiler already has both 'bool' and '_Bool', we can assume they
+ are the same types. */
+# if !@HAVE__BOOL@
+typedef bool _Bool;
+# endif
+# else
+# if !defined __GNUC__
+ /* If @HAVE__BOOL@:
+ Some HP-UX cc and AIX IBM C compiler versions have compiler bugs when
+ the built-in _Bool type is used. See
+ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg02303.html
+ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-11/msg00161.html
+ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2005-10/msg00086.html
+ Similar bugs are likely with other compilers as well; this file
+ wouldn't be used if <stdbool.h> was working.
+ So we override the _Bool type.
+ If !@HAVE__BOOL@:
+ Need to define _Bool ourselves. As 'signed char' or as an enum type?
+ Use of a typedef, with SunPRO C, leads to a stupid
+ "warning: _Bool is a keyword in ISO C99".
+ Use of an enum type, with IRIX cc, leads to a stupid
+ "warning(1185): enumerated type mixed with another type".
+ Even the existence of an enum type, without a typedef,
+ "Invalid enumerator. (badenum)" with HP-UX cc on Tru64.
+ The only benefit of the enum, debuggability, is not important
+ with these compilers. So use 'signed char' and no enum. */
+# define _Bool signed char
+# else
+ /* With this compiler, trust the _Bool type if the compiler has it. */
+# if !@HAVE__BOOL@
+ /* For the sake of symbolic names in gdb, define true and false as
+ enum constants, not only as macros.
+ It is tempting to write
+ typedef enum { false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
+ so that gdb prints values of type 'bool' symbolically. But then
+ values of type '_Bool' might promote to 'int' or 'unsigned int'
+ (see ISO C 99 6.7.2.2.(4)); however, '_Bool' must promote to 'int'
+ (see ISO C 99 6.3.1.1.(2)). So add a negative value to the
+ enum; this ensures that '_Bool' promotes to 'int'. */
+typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0, true = 1 } _Bool;
+# endif
+# endif
+# endif
+# define bool _Bool
+#endif
+
+/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives. */
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+# define false false
+# define true true
+#else
+# define false 0
+# define true 1
+#endif
+
+#define __bool_true_false_are_defined 1
+
+#endif /* _GL_STDBOOL_H */