diff options
author | Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> | 2009-06-27 09:55:32 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> | 2009-06-27 09:22:10 +0100 |
commit | 70ec3bb8ea3f8c55b255f41d122c7d4d8c0d00b4 (patch) | |
tree | 8d61fcbd6d49c8dde71426513b6945dd147935b5 /drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c | |
parent | 89bb871e96cdc3d78b7f69f0bacc94b21bbaccfd (diff) | |
download | linux-rt-70ec3bb8ea3f8c55b255f41d122c7d4d8c0d00b4.tar.gz |
mtd: Use BLOCK_NIL consistently in NFTL/INFTL
Use BLOCK_NIL consistently rather than sometimes 0xffff and sometimes
BLOCK_NIL.
The semantic patch that finds this issue is below
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/). On the other hand, the changes
were made by hand, in part because drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c contains dead
code that causes spatch to ignore a relevant function. Specifically, the
function INFTL_findwriteunit contains a do-while loop, but always takes a
return that leaves the loop on the first iteration.
// <smpl>
@r exists@
identifier f,C;
@@
f(...) { ... return C; }
@s@
identifier r.C;
expression E;
@@
@@
identifier r.f,r.C,I;
expression s.E;
@@
f(...) {
<...
(
I
|
- E
+ C
)
...>
}
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c b/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c index 73f05227dc8c..d8cf29c01cc4 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static u16 INFTL_findfreeblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int desperate) if (!desperate && inftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) { DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "INFTL: there are too few free " "EUNs (%d)\n", inftl->numfreeEUNs); - return 0xffff; + return BLOCK_NIL; } /* Scan for a free block */ @@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ static u16 INFTL_foldchain(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned silly = MAX_LOOPS; while (thisEUN < inftl->nb_blocks) { for (block = 0; block < inftl->EraseSize/SECTORSIZE; block ++) { - if ((BlockMap[block] != 0xffff) || BlockDeleted[block]) + if ((BlockMap[block] != BLOCK_NIL) || + BlockDeleted[block]) continue; if (inftl_read_oob(mtd, (thisEUN * inftl->EraseSize) @@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u16 INFTL_findwriteunit(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned block) if (!silly--) { printk(KERN_WARNING "INFTL: infinite loop in " "Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n", thisVUC); - return 0xffff; + return BLOCK_NIL; } /* Skip to next block in chain */ @@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ hitused: * waiting to be picked up. We're going to have to fold * a chain to make room. */ - thisEUN = INFTL_makefreeblock(inftl, 0xffff); + thisEUN = INFTL_makefreeblock(inftl, BLOCK_NIL); /* * Hopefully we free something, lets try again. @@ -631,7 +632,7 @@ hitused: printk(KERN_WARNING "INFTL: error folding to make room for Virtual " "Unit Chain 0x%x\n", thisVUC); - return 0xffff; + return BLOCK_NIL; } /* |