summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>2009-06-27 09:55:32 +0200
committerDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>2009-06-27 09:22:10 +0100
commit70ec3bb8ea3f8c55b255f41d122c7d4d8c0d00b4 (patch)
tree8d61fcbd6d49c8dde71426513b6945dd147935b5 /drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c
parent89bb871e96cdc3d78b7f69f0bacc94b21bbaccfd (diff)
downloadlinux-rt-70ec3bb8ea3f8c55b255f41d122c7d4d8c0d00b4.tar.gz
mtd: Use BLOCK_NIL consistently in NFTL/INFTL
Use BLOCK_NIL consistently rather than sometimes 0xffff and sometimes BLOCK_NIL. The semantic patch that finds this issue is below (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/). On the other hand, the changes were made by hand, in part because drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c contains dead code that causes spatch to ignore a relevant function. Specifically, the function INFTL_findwriteunit contains a do-while loop, but always takes a return that leaves the loop on the first iteration. // <smpl> @r exists@ identifier f,C; @@ f(...) { ... return C; } @s@ identifier r.C; expression E; @@ @@ identifier r.f,r.C,I; expression s.E; @@ f(...) { <... ( I | - E + C ) ...> } // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c11
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c b/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c
index 73f05227dc8c..d8cf29c01cc4 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static u16 INFTL_findfreeblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int desperate)
if (!desperate && inftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) {
DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "INFTL: there are too few free "
"EUNs (%d)\n", inftl->numfreeEUNs);
- return 0xffff;
+ return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Scan for a free block */
@@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ static u16 INFTL_foldchain(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned
silly = MAX_LOOPS;
while (thisEUN < inftl->nb_blocks) {
for (block = 0; block < inftl->EraseSize/SECTORSIZE; block ++) {
- if ((BlockMap[block] != 0xffff) || BlockDeleted[block])
+ if ((BlockMap[block] != BLOCK_NIL) ||
+ BlockDeleted[block])
continue;
if (inftl_read_oob(mtd, (thisEUN * inftl->EraseSize)
@@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u16 INFTL_findwriteunit(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned block)
if (!silly--) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "INFTL: infinite loop in "
"Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n", thisVUC);
- return 0xffff;
+ return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/* Skip to next block in chain */
@@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ hitused:
* waiting to be picked up. We're going to have to fold
* a chain to make room.
*/
- thisEUN = INFTL_makefreeblock(inftl, 0xffff);
+ thisEUN = INFTL_makefreeblock(inftl, BLOCK_NIL);
/*
* Hopefully we free something, lets try again.
@@ -631,7 +632,7 @@ hitused:
printk(KERN_WARNING "INFTL: error folding to make room for Virtual "
"Unit Chain 0x%x\n", thisVUC);
- return 0xffff;
+ return BLOCK_NIL;
}
/*