path: root/patches/0025-kprobes-Cure-hotplug-lock-ordering-issues.patch

From 2d1e38f56622b9bb5af85be63c1052c056f5c677 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:15:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 25/32] kprobes: Cure hotplug lock ordering issues

Converting the cpu hotplug locking to a percpu rwsem unearthed hidden lock
ordering problems.

There is a wide range of locks involved in this: kprobe_mutex,
jump_label_mutex, ftrace_lock, text_mutex, event_mutex, module_mutex,
func_hash->regex_lock and a gazillion of lock order permutations with
nested get_online_cpus() calls.

Some of those permutations are potential deadlocks even with the current
nesting hotplug locking scheme, but they can't be discovered by lockdep.

The conversion of the hotplug locking to a percpu rwsem requires to prevent
nested locking, so it's required to take the hotplug rwsem early in the
call chain and establish a proper lock order.

After quite some analysis and going down the wrong road severa times the
following lock order has been chosen:

kprobe_mutex -> cpus_rwsem -> jump_label_mutex -> text_mutex

For kprobes which hook on an ftrace function trace point, it's required to
drop cpus_rwsem before calling into the ftrace code to avoid a deadlock on
the func_hash->regex_lock.

[ Steven: Ftrace interaction fixes ]

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170524081549.104864779@linutronix.de
---
 kernel/kprobes.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index 2d2d3a568e4e..9f6056749a28 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -483,11 +483,6 @@ static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(optimizing_work, kprobe_optimizer);
  */
 static void do_optimize_kprobes(void)
 {
-	/* Optimization never be done when disarmed */
-	if (kprobes_all_disarmed || !kprobes_allow_optimization ||
-	    list_empty(&optimizing_list))
-		return;
-
 	/*
 	 * The optimization/unoptimization refers online_cpus via
 	 * stop_machine() and cpu-hotplug modifies online_cpus.
@@ -495,14 +490,19 @@ static void do_optimize_kprobes(void)
 	 * This combination can cause a deadlock (cpu-hotplug try to lock
 	 * text_mutex but stop_machine can not be done because online_cpus
 	 * has been changed)
-	 * To avoid this deadlock, we need to call get_online_cpus()
+	 * To avoid this deadlock, caller must have locked cpu hotplug
 	 * for preventing cpu-hotplug outside of text_mutex locking.
 	 */
-	get_online_cpus();
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
+	/* Optimization never be done when disarmed */
+	if (kprobes_all_disarmed || !kprobes_allow_optimization ||
+	    list_empty(&optimizing_list))
+		return;
+
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 	arch_optimize_kprobes(&optimizing_list);
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
-	put_online_cpus();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -513,12 +513,13 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void)
 {
 	struct optimized_kprobe *op, *tmp;
 
+	/* See comment in do_optimize_kprobes() */
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
 	/* Unoptimization must be done anytime */
 	if (list_empty(&unoptimizing_list))
 		return;
 
-	/* Ditto to do_optimize_kprobes */
-	get_online_cpus();
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 	arch_unoptimize_kprobes(&unoptimizing_list, &freeing_list);
 	/* Loop free_list for disarming */
@@ -537,7 +538,6 @@ static void do_unoptimize_kprobes(void)
 			list_del_init(&op->list);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
-	put_online_cpus();
 }
 
 /* Reclaim all kprobes on the free_list */
@@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static void kick_kprobe_optimizer(void)
 static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	/* Lock modules while optimizing kprobes */
 	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
 
@@ -587,6 +588,7 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
 	do_free_cleaned_kprobes();
 
 	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
 
 	/* Step 5: Kick optimizer again if needed */
@@ -650,9 +652,8 @@ static void optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 /* Short cut to direct unoptimizing */
 static void force_unoptimize_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op)
 {
-	get_online_cpus();
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
 	arch_unoptimize_kprobe(op);
-	put_online_cpus();
 	if (kprobe_disabled(&op->kp))
 		arch_disarm_kprobe(&op->kp);
 }
@@ -791,6 +792,7 @@ static void try_to_optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		return;
 
 	/* For preparing optimization, jump_label_text_reserved() is called */
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	jump_label_lock();
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 
@@ -812,6 +814,7 @@ static void try_to_optimize_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
 	jump_label_unlock();
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
@@ -826,6 +829,7 @@ static void optimize_all_kprobes(void)
 	if (kprobes_allow_optimization)
 		goto out;
 
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	kprobes_allow_optimization = true;
 	for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
 		head = &kprobe_table[i];
@@ -833,6 +837,7 @@ static void optimize_all_kprobes(void)
 			if (!kprobe_disabled(p))
 				optimize_kprobe(p);
 	}
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally optimized\n");
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
@@ -851,6 +856,7 @@ static void unoptimize_all_kprobes(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	kprobes_allow_optimization = false;
 	for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
 		head = &kprobe_table[i];
@@ -859,6 +865,7 @@ static void unoptimize_all_kprobes(void)
 				unoptimize_kprobe(p, false);
 		}
 	}
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
 
 	/* Wait for unoptimizing completion */
@@ -1010,14 +1017,11 @@ static void arm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
 		arm_kprobe_ftrace(kp);
 		return;
 	}
-	/*
-	 * Here, since __arm_kprobe() doesn't use stop_machine(),
-	 * this doesn't cause deadlock on text_mutex. So, we don't
-	 * need get_online_cpus().
-	 */
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 	__arm_kprobe(kp);
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /* Disarm a kprobe with text_mutex */
@@ -1027,10 +1031,12 @@ static void disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp, bool reopt)
 		disarm_kprobe_ftrace(kp);
 		return;
 	}
-	/* Ditto */
+
+	cpus_read_lock();
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 	__disarm_kprobe(kp, reopt);
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1298,13 +1304,10 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct kprobe *ap = orig_p;
 
+	cpus_read_lock();
+
 	/* For preparing optimization, jump_label_text_reserved() is called */
 	jump_label_lock();
-	/*
-	 * Get online CPUs to avoid text_mutex deadlock.with stop machine,
-	 * which is invoked by unoptimize_kprobe() in add_new_kprobe()
-	 */
-	get_online_cpus();
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 
 	if (!kprobe_aggrprobe(orig_p)) {
@@ -1352,8 +1355,8 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
 
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
-	put_online_cpus();
 	jump_label_unlock();
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 
 	if (ret == 0 && kprobe_disabled(ap) && !kprobe_disabled(p)) {
 		ap->flags &= ~KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
@@ -1555,9 +1558,12 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);	/* Avoiding text modification */
+	cpus_read_lock();
+	/* Prevent text modification */
+	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
 	ret = prepare_kprobe(p);
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -1570,7 +1576,6 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 
 	/* Try to optimize kprobe */
 	try_to_optimize_kprobe(p);
-
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
 
-- 
2.11.0