summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-01-01 11:15:05 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2023-01-01 11:15:05 -0800
commit95d248d16f9cb42de717367832cffa0f83e97fde (patch)
tree7d1fc6162e413a987dc43d466df2573da1e0bfd0
parent8b41948296b76588f5ebaf7cbc5be5c803ece70a (diff)
parent94cd8fa09f5f1ebdd4e90964b08b7f2cc4b36c43 (diff)
downloadlinux-95d248d16f9cb42de717367832cffa0f83e97fde.tar.gz
Merge tag 'locking_urgent_for_v6.2_rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Borislav Petkov: - Prevent the leaking of a debug timer in futex_waitv() - A preempt-RT mutex locking fix, adding the proper acquire semantics * tag 'locking_urgent_for_v6.2_rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: futex: Fix futex_waitv() hrtimer debug object leak on kcalloc error rtmutex: Add acquire semantics for rtmutex lock acquisition slow path
-rw-r--r--kernel/futex/syscalls.c11
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex.c55
-rw-r--r--kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c6
3 files changed, 56 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
index 086a22d1adb7..a8074079b09e 100644
--- a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
@@ -286,19 +286,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(futex_waitv, struct futex_waitv __user *, waiters,
}
futexv = kcalloc(nr_futexes, sizeof(*futexv), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!futexv)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!futexv) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto destroy_timer;
+ }
ret = futex_parse_waitv(futexv, waiters, nr_futexes);
if (!ret)
ret = futex_wait_multiple(futexv, nr_futexes, timeout ? &to : NULL);
+ kfree(futexv);
+
+destroy_timer:
if (timeout) {
hrtimer_cancel(&to.timer);
destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to.timer);
}
-
- kfree(futexv);
return ret;
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 7779ee8abc2a..010cf4e6d0b8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -89,15 +89,31 @@ static inline int __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct rt_mutex *lock,
* set this bit before looking at the lock.
*/
-static __always_inline void
-rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
+static __always_inline struct task_struct *
+rt_mutex_owner_encode(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
{
unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner;
if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
- WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, (struct task_struct *)val);
+ return (struct task_struct *)val;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void
+rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+ /*
+ * lock->wait_lock is held but explicit acquire semantics are needed
+ * for a new lock owner so WRITE_ONCE is insufficient.
+ */
+ xchg_acquire(&lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, owner));
+}
+
+static __always_inline void rt_mutex_clear_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+{
+ /* lock->wait_lock is held so the unlock provides release semantics. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, NULL));
}
static __always_inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
@@ -106,7 +122,8 @@ static __always_inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
}
-static __always_inline void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+static __always_inline void
+fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, bool acquire_lock)
{
unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
@@ -172,8 +189,21 @@ static __always_inline void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
* still set.
*/
owner = READ_ONCE(*p);
- if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS)
- WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
+ if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) {
+ /*
+ * See rt_mutex_set_owner() and rt_mutex_clear_owner() on
+ * why xchg_acquire() is used for updating owner for
+ * locking and WRITE_ONCE() for unlocking.
+ *
+ * WRITE_ONCE() would work for the acquire case too, but
+ * in case that the lock acquisition failed it might
+ * force other lockers into the slow path unnecessarily.
+ */
+ if (acquire_lock)
+ xchg_acquire(p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
+ else
+ WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -208,6 +238,13 @@ static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
owner = *p;
} while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner,
owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
+
+ /*
+ * The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE
+ * operations in the event of contention. Ensure the successful
+ * cmpxchg is visible.
+ */
+ smp_mb__after_atomic();
}
/*
@@ -1243,7 +1280,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit
* unconditionally. Clean this up.
*/
- fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
return ret;
}
@@ -1604,7 +1641,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit
* unconditionally. We might have to fix that up.
*/
- fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
@@ -1719,7 +1756,7 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally.
* We might have to fix that up:
*/
- fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
trace_contention_end(lock, 0);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
index 900220941caa..cb9fdff76a8a 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
{
debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
- rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
+ rt_mutex_clear_owner(lock);
}
/**
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
* have to fix that up.
*/
- fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
return ret;
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ bool __sched rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
* have to fix that up.
*/
- fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+ fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, false);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);