| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 65429b9af6a2c99d340ab2dcddd41dab201f399c.
Broke several projects, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D144509#4347562 onwards.
Also reverts follow-up commit "[OpenMP] Compile assembly files as ASM, not C"
This reverts commit 4072c8aee4c89c4457f4f30d01dc9bb4dfa52559.
Also reverts fix attempt "[cmake] Set CMP0091 to fix Windows builds after the cmake_minimum_required bump"
This reverts commit 7d47dac5f828efd1d378ba44a97559114f00fb64.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
The owner of the last two failing buildbots updated CMake.
This reverts commit e8e8707b4aa6e4cc04c0cffb2de01d2de71165fc.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Unfortunatly not all buildbots are updated.
This reverts commit ffb807ab5375b3f78df198dc5d4302b3b552242f.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
All build bots should be updated now.
This reverts commit 44d38022ab29a3156349602733b3459df5beef93.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 1ef4c3c859728008cf707cad8d67f45ae5070ae1.
Two buildbots still haven't been updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 92523a35a827539db8557bbc3ecab7f9ea3f6ade.
Reland to see whether CIs are updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit a72165e5df59032cdd54dcb18155f2630d73abd1.
Some buildbots have not been updated yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This reverts commit 92523a35a827539db8557bbc3ecab7f9ea3f6ade.
Test whether all CI runners are updated.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some build bots have not been updated to the new minimal CMake version.
Reverting for now and ping the buildbot owners.
This reverts commit 44c6b905f8527635e49bb3ea97dea315f92d38ec.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This partly undoes D137724.
This change has been discussed on discourse
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-upgrading-llvms-minimum-required-cmake-version/66193
Note this does not remove work-arounds for older CMake versions, that
will be done in followup patches.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, MaskRay, ChuanqiXu, to268, thieta, tschuett, phosek, #libunwind, #libc_vendors, #libc, #libc_abi, sivachandra, philnik, zibi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144509
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.14/module/GNUInstallDirs.html#result-variables for `CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_*`
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130545
|
|
|
Note: the term "libgcc" refers to the all of `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`.
Enabling libunwind as a replacement for libgcc on Linux has proven to be
challenging since libgcc_s.so is a required dependency in the [Linux
standard base][5]. Some software is transitively dependent on libgcc
because glibc makes hardcoded calls to functions in libgcc_s. For example,
the function `__GI___backtrace` eventually makes its way to a [hardcoded
dlopen to libgcc_s' _Unwind_Backtrace][1]. Since libgcc_{eh.a,s.so} and
libunwind have the same ABI, but different implementations, the two
libraries end up [cross-talking, which ultimately results in a
segfault][2].
To solve this problem, libunwind needs to build a “libgcc”. That is, link
the necessary functions from compiler-rt and libunwind into an archive
and shared object that advertise themselves as `libgcc.a`, `libgcc_eh.a`,
and `libgcc_s.so`, so that glibc’s baked calls are diverted to the
correct objects in memory. Fortunately for us, compiler-rt and libunwind
use the same ABI as the libgcc family, so the problem is solvable at the
llvm-project configuration level: no program source needs to be edited.
Thus, the end result is for a user to configure their LLVM build with a
flag that indicates they want to archive compiler-rt/unwind as libgcc.
We achieve this by compiling libunwind with all the symbols necessary
for compiler-rt to emulate the libgcc family, and then generate symlinks
named for our "libgcc" that point to their corresponding libunwind
counterparts.
We alternatively considered patching glibc so that the source doesn't
directly refer to libgcc, but rather _defaults_ to libgcc, so that a
system preferring compiler-rt/libunwind can point to these libraries
at the config stage instead. Even if we modified the Linux standard
base, this alternative won't work because binaries that are built using
libgcc will still end up having crosstalk between the differing
implementations.
This problem has been solved in this manner for [FreeBSD][3], and this
CL has been tested against [Chrome OS][4].
[1]: https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/master/sysdeps/arm/backtrace.c#L68
[2]: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1162190#c16
[3]: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/tree/main/lib/libgcc_s
[4]: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/overlays/chromiumos-overlay/+/2945947
[5]: https://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_5.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libgcc-s.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108416
|
