1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
|
# -*-perl-*-
$description = "Test handling of double-colon rules.";
$details = "\
We test these features:
- Multiple commands for the same (double-colon) target
- Different prerequisites for targets: only out-of-date
ones are rebuilt.
- Double-colon targets that aren't the goal target.
Then we do the same thing for parallel builds: double-colon
targets should always be built serially.";
# TEST 0: A simple double-colon rule that isn't the goal target.
run_make_test(q!
all: baz
foo:: f1.h ; @echo foo FIRST
foo:: f2.h ; @echo foo SECOND
bar:: ; @echo aaa; sleep 1; echo aaa done
bar:: ; @echo bbb
baz:: ; @echo aaa
baz:: ; @echo bbb
biz:: ; @echo aaa
biz:: two ; @echo bbb
two: ; @echo two
f1.h f2.h: ; @echo $@
d :: ; @echo ok
d :: d ; @echo oops
!,
"all", "aaa\nbbb\n");
# TEST 1: As above, in parallel
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 all", "aaa\nbbb\n");
}
# TEST 2: A simple double-colon rule that is the goal target
run_make_test(undef, "bar", "aaa\naaa done\nbbb\n");
# TEST 3: As above, in parallel
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 bar", "aaa\naaa done\nbbb\n");
}
# TEST 4: Each double-colon rule is supposed to be run individually
&utouch(-5, 'f2.h');
&touch('foo');
run_make_test(undef, "foo", "f1.h\nfoo FIRST\n");
# TEST 5: Again, in parallel.
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 foo", "f1.h\nfoo FIRST\n");
}
# TEST 6: Each double-colon rule is supposed to be run individually
&utouch(-5, 'f1.h');
unlink('f2.h');
&touch('foo');
run_make_test(undef, "foo", "f2.h\nfoo SECOND\n");
# TEST 7: Again, in parallel.
if ($parallel_jobs) {
run_make_test(undef, "-j10 foo", "f2.h\nfoo SECOND\n");
}
# TEST 8: Test circular dependency check; PR/1671
run_make_test(undef, "d", "ok\n$make_name: Circular d <- d dependency dropped.\noops\n");
# TEST 8: I don't grok why this is different than the above, but it is...
#
# Hmm... further testing indicates this might be timing-dependent?
#
#if ($parallel_jobs) {
# run_make_test(undef, "-j10 biz", "aaa\ntwo\nbbb\n");
#}
unlink('foo','f1.h','f2.h');
# TEST 9: make sure all rules in s double colon family get executed
# (Savannah bug #14334).
#
&touch('one');
&touch('two');
run_make_test('
.RECIPEPREFIX = >
.PHONY: all
all: result
result:: one
> @echo $^ >>$@
> @echo $^
result:: two
> @echo $^ >>$@
> @echo $^
',
'',
'one
two');
unlink('result','one','two');
# TEST 10: SV 33399 : check for proper backslash handling
run_make_test('
a\ xb :: ; @echo one
a\ xb :: ; @echo two
',
'', "one\ntwo\n");
# Test 11: SV 44742 : All double-colon rules should be run in parallel build.
run_make_test('
.RECIPEPREFIX = >
result :: 01
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 02
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 03
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 04
> @echo update
> @touch $@
result :: 05
> @echo update
> @touch $@
01 02 03 04 05:
> @touch 01 02 03 04 05
',
'-j10 result', "update\nupdate\nupdate\nupdate\nupdate\n");
unlink('result', '01', '02', '03', '04', '05');
# Test 12: SV 44742 : Double-colon rules with parallelism
run_make_test('
root: all ; echo root
all:: ; echo all_one
all:: 3 ; echo all_two
%: ; sleep $*
',
'-rs -j2 1 2 root', "all_one\nall_two\nroot\n");
# SV 47995 : Parallel double-colon rules with FORCE
run_make_test('
all:: ; @echo one
all:: joe ; @echo four
joe: FORCE ; touch joe-is-forced
FORCE:
',
'-j5', "one\ntouch joe-is-forced\nfour\n");
unlink('joe-is-forced');
# sv 60188.
# Even though test.x is explicitly mentioned, terminal pattern rules still
# apply only if the prerequisite exists.
touch('hello.z');
# subtest 1. test.x is explicitly mentioned.
run_make_test(q!
all: hello.z
%.z:: test.x ; touch $@
%.x: ;
!,
'', "#MAKE#: Nothing to be done for 'all'.\n");
unlink('hello.z');
# subtest 2. hello.x is derived from the stem.
touch('hello.z');
run_make_test(q!
all: hello.z
%.z:: %.x; touch $@
%.x: ; touch $@
!,
'', "#MAKE#: Nothing to be done for 'all'.\n");
unlink('hello.z');
# subtest 3
# hello.x is explicitly mentioned on an unrelated rule and thus is not an
# intermediate file.
# Terminal pattern rules do not apply anyway and there is no rule to built
# 'hello.x'.
touch('hello.z');
run_make_test(q!
all: hello.z
%.z:: %.x; touch $@
%.x: ;
unrelated: hello.x
!,
'', "#MAKE#: *** No rule to make target 'hello.x', needed by 'hello.z'. Stop.\n", 512);
unlink('hello.z');
# This tells the test driver that the perl test script executed properly.
1;
|
