diff options
author | Sergey Petrunia <sergefp@mysql.com> | 2008-12-19 16:38:39 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sergey Petrunia <sergefp@mysql.com> | 2008-12-19 16:38:39 +0300 |
commit | 8cecb71d1d24da8260e996d02be171e02d495bbc (patch) | |
tree | d440dced3e9e4d9ef547b43b3da7faccb0baddaf /mysql-test/r/index_merge.result | |
parent | 8c9e7a64c55ecbb8da837f932203a697cac04c55 (diff) | |
download | mariadb-git-8cecb71d1d24da8260e996d02be171e02d495bbc.tar.gz |
BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
- QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT deinitializes its rnd_pos() scan when it reaches EOF, but we
need to make the deinitialization in QUICK_INDEX_MERGE_SELECT destructor also. This is because
certain execution strategies can stop scanning without reaching EOF, then then try to do a full
table scan on this table. Failure to deinitialize caused the full scan to use (already empty)
table->sort and produce zero records.
mysql-test/r/index_merge.result:
BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
- Testcase
mysql-test/t/index_merge.test:
BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check
- Testcase
Diffstat (limited to 'mysql-test/r/index_merge.result')
-rw-r--r-- | mysql-test/r/index_merge.result | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/r/index_merge.result b/mysql-test/r/index_merge.result index ed397e8fdc8..f3fce29c910 100644 --- a/mysql-test/r/index_merge.result +++ b/mysql-test/r/index_merge.result @@ -527,4 +527,32 @@ b a y z DROP TABLE t1; +# +# BUG#40974: Incorrect query results when using clause evaluated using range check +# +create table t0 (a int); +insert into t0 values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9); +create table t1 (a int); +insert into t1 values (1),(2); +create table t2(a int, b int); +insert into t2 values (1,1), (2, 1000); +create table t3 (a int, b int, filler char(100), key(a), key(b)); +insert into t3 select 1000, 1000,'filler' from t0 A, t0 B, t0 C; +insert into t3 values (1,1,'data'); +insert into t3 values (1,1,'data'); +The plan should be ALL/ALL/ALL(Range checked for each record (index map: 0x3) +explain select * from t1 +where exists (select 1 from t2, t3 +where t2.a=t1.a and (t3.a=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b+1)); +id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra +1 PRIMARY t1 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 2 Using where +2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t2 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 2 Using where +2 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY t3 ALL a,b NULL NULL NULL 1002 Range checked for each record (index map: 0x3) +select * from t1 +where exists (select 1 from t2, t3 +where t2.a=t1.a and (t3.a=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b or t3.b=t2.b+1)); +a +1 +2 +drop table t0, t1, t2, t3; End of 5.0 tests |