summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mysql-test/t
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorunknown <malff/marcsql@weblab.(none)>2007-09-04 12:25:54 -0600
committerunknown <malff/marcsql@weblab.(none)>2007-09-04 12:25:54 -0600
commitc458f7f6a3b6cf6754c9843d6801c9b0f86ffe48 (patch)
treee709d9cce3d8a2b77acda70637623f1faf7eb64f /mysql-test/t
parent943ed8fe354734fa52417bf36920462ab23756d3 (diff)
parent6bfae914a2a0e7661c75c030b0bf88c8490323ed (diff)
downloadmariadb-git-c458f7f6a3b6cf6754c9843d6801c9b0f86ffe48.tar.gz
Merge weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-base
into weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-rt50-merge mysql-test/r/sp.result: Auto merged mysql-test/t/mysql.test: Auto merged mysql-test/t/query_cache.test: Auto merged mysql-test/t/sp.test: Auto merged sql/item_cmpfunc.h: Auto merged sql/rpl_utility.h: Auto merged sql/sql_base.cc: Auto merged sql/sql_cache.cc: Auto merged sql/sql_lex.cc: Auto merged sql/sql_lex.h: Auto merged
Diffstat (limited to 'mysql-test/t')
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/comments.test31
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/events.test54
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/insert_update.test35
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/mysql.test5
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test333
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/sp-error.test15
-rw-r--r--mysql-test/t/sp.test119
7 files changed, 582 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/comments.test b/mysql-test/t/comments.test
index 8ae6ba5779e..3a18a8bd483 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/comments.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/comments.test
@@ -34,3 +34,34 @@ select 1/*!999992*/;
select 1 + /*!00000 2 */ + 3 /*!99999 noise*/ + 4;
+#
+# Bug#28779 (mysql_query() allows execution of statements with unbalanced
+# comments)
+#
+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists table_28779;
+--enable_warnings
+
+create table table_28779 (a int);
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*' AND b = 'bar';";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*' AND b = 'bar';*";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*! AND 2=2;";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*! AND 2=2;*";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';";
+
+--error 1064
+prepare bar from "DELETE FROM table_28779 WHERE a = 7 OR 1=1/*!98765' AND b = 'bar';*";
+
+drop table table_28779;
+
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/events.test b/mysql-test/t/events.test
index d7232705b81..20134765609 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/events.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/events.test
@@ -432,8 +432,11 @@ create event закачка on schedule every 10 hour do select get_lock("test_l
--echo "Should return 1 row"
select definer, name, db from mysql.event;
---echo "Should be only 1 process"
-select /*1*/ user, host, db, command, state, info from information_schema.processlist where (command!='Daemon' || user='event_scheduler') and (info is null or info not like '%processlist%') order by info;
+--echo "Should be only 0 process"
+select /*1*/ user, host, db, command, state, info
+ from information_schema.processlist
+ where (user='event_scheduler')
+ order by info;
select release_lock("test_lock1");
drop event закачка;
--echo "Should have 0 events"
@@ -447,14 +450,28 @@ set global event_scheduler=on;
select get_lock("test_lock2", 20);
--echo "Create an event which tries to acquire a mutex. The event locks on the mutex"
create event закачка on schedule every 10 hour do select get_lock("test_lock2", 20);
---echo "Let some time pass to the event starts"
---sleep 1
+
--echo "Should have only 2 processes: the scheduler and the locked event"
-select /*2*/ user, host, db, command, state, info from information_schema.processlist where (command!='Daemon' || user='event_scheduler') and (info is null or info not like '%processlist%') order by info;--echo "Release the mutex, the event worker should finish."
+let $wait_condition= select count(*) = 2 from information_schema.processlist
+ where ( (state like 'User lock%' AND info like 'select get_lock%')
+ OR (command='Daemon' AND user='event_scheduler'));
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+
+select /*2*/ user, host, db, command, state, info
+ from information_schema.processlist
+ where (info like "select get_lock%" OR user='event_scheduler')
+ order by info;
--echo "Release the mutex, the event worker should finish."
select release_lock("test_lock2");
drop event закачка;
+# Wait for release_lock("test_lock2") to complete,
+# to avoid polluting the next test information_schema.processlist
+let $wait_condition= select count(*) = 0 from information_schema.processlist
+ where (state like 'User lock%' AND info like 'select get_lock%');
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+
+
##
## 1. get a lock
## 2. create an event
@@ -466,13 +483,30 @@ drop event закачка;
set global event_scheduler=1;
select get_lock("test_lock2_1", 20);
create event закачка21 on schedule every 10 hour do select get_lock("test_lock2_1", 20);
---sleep 1
---echo "Should have only 3 processes: the scheduler, our conn and the locked event"
-select /*3*/ user, host, db, command, state, info from information_schema.processlist where (command!='Daemon' || user='event_scheduler') and (info is null or info not like '%processlist%') order by info;
+
+--echo "Should have only 2 processes: the scheduler and the locked event"
+let $wait_condition= select count(*) = 2 from information_schema.processlist
+ where ( (state like 'User lock%' AND info like 'select get_lock%')
+ OR (command='Daemon' AND user='event_scheduler'));
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+
+select /*3*/ user, host, db, command, state, info
+ from information_schema.processlist
+ where (info like "select get_lock%" OR user='event_scheduler')
+ order by info;
+
set global event_scheduler=off;
---sleep 0.8
+
+let $wait_condition= select count(*) =1 from information_schema.processlist
+ where (info like "select get_lock%" OR user='event_scheduler');
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+
--echo "Should have only our process now:"
-select /*4*/ user, host, db, command, state, info from information_schema.processlist where (command!='Daemon' || user='event_scheduler') and (info is null or info not like '%processlist%') order by info;
+select /*4*/ user, host, db, command, state, info
+ from information_schema.processlist
+ where (info like "select get_lock%" OR user='event_scheduler')
+ order by info;
+select release_lock("test_lock2_1");
drop event закачка21;
let $wait_condition=
select count(*) = 0 from information_schema.processlist
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/insert_update.test b/mysql-test/t/insert_update.test
index 67f21731afe..aad241e031f 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/insert_update.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/insert_update.test
@@ -306,3 +306,38 @@ insert into t1(f1) values(1) on duplicate key update f1=1;
select @stamp2:=f2 from t1;
select if( @stamp1 = @stamp2, "correct", "wrong");
drop table t1;
+
+#
+# Bug#28587 SELECT is blocked by INSERT waiting on read lock, even with low_priority_updates
+#
+--echo connection: default
+set low_priority_updates=1;
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists t1;
+--enable_warnings
+create table t1 (a int, b int, unique key t1$a (a));
+lock table t1 read;
+connect (update,localhost,root,,);
+connection update;
+--echo connection: update
+set low_priority_updates=1;
+show variables like 'low_priority_updates';
+let $ID= `select connection_id()`;
+--send insert into t1 values (1, 2) ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE b = 2;
+connection default;
+# we must wait till the insert opens and locks the table
+let $wait_condition=
+ select count(*) = 1 from information_schema.processlist
+ where state = "Locked" and id = $ID;
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+connect (select,localhost,root,,);
+--echo connection: select
+select * from t1;
+connection default;
+--echo connection: default
+select * from t1;
+connection default;
+disconnect update;
+disconnect select;
+drop table t1;
+set low_priority_updates=default;
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/mysql.test b/mysql-test/t/mysql.test
index ac713d49b92..3ee04f32640 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/mysql.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/mysql.test
@@ -277,6 +277,11 @@ remove_file $MYSQLTEST_VARDIR/tmp/bug21412.sql;
--exec $MYSQL --pager="540bytelengthstringxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" -e "select 1" > /dev/null 2>&1
--exec $MYSQL --character-sets-dir="540bytelengthstringxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" -e "select 1" 2>&1
+#
+# bug #30164: Using client side macro inside server side comments generates broken queries
+#
+--exec $MYSQL test -e "/*! \C latin1 */ select 1;"
+
--echo End of 5.0 tests
#
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test b/mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..484c8759779
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists t1_30237_bool;
+--enable_warnings
+
+create table t1_30237_bool(A boolean, B boolean, C boolean);
+
+insert into t1_30237_bool values
+(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE),
+(FALSE, FALSE, NULL),
+(FALSE, FALSE, TRUE),
+(FALSE, NULL, FALSE),
+(FALSE, NULL, NULL),
+(FALSE, NULL, TRUE),
+(FALSE, TRUE, FALSE),
+(FALSE, TRUE, NULL),
+(FALSE, TRUE, TRUE),
+(NULL, FALSE, FALSE),
+(NULL, FALSE, NULL),
+(NULL, FALSE, TRUE),
+(NULL, NULL, FALSE),
+(NULL, NULL, NULL),
+(NULL, NULL, TRUE),
+(NULL, TRUE, FALSE),
+(NULL, TRUE, NULL),
+(NULL, TRUE, TRUE),
+(TRUE, FALSE, FALSE),
+(TRUE, FALSE, NULL),
+(TRUE, FALSE, TRUE),
+(TRUE, NULL, FALSE),
+(TRUE, NULL, NULL),
+(TRUE, NULL, TRUE),
+(TRUE, TRUE, FALSE),
+(TRUE, TRUE, NULL),
+(TRUE, TRUE, TRUE) ;
+
+--echo Testing OR, XOR, AND
+select A, B, A OR B, A XOR B, A AND B
+ from t1_30237_bool where C is null order by A, B;
+
+--echo Testing that OR is associative
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) OR C, A OR (B OR C), A OR B OR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where ((A OR B) OR C) != (A OR (B OR C));
+
+--echo Testing that XOR is associative
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) XOR C, A XOR (B XOR C), A XOR B XOR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where ((A XOR B) XOR C) != (A XOR (B XOR C));
+
+--echo Testing that AND is associative
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) AND C, A AND (B AND C), A AND B AND C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where ((A AND B) AND C) != (A AND (B AND C));
+
+--echo Testing that AND has precedence over OR
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) AND C, A OR (B AND C), A OR B AND C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where (A OR (B AND C)) != (A OR B AND C);
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) OR C, A AND (B OR C), A AND B OR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where ((A AND B) OR C) != (A AND B OR C);
+
+--echo Testing that AND has precedence over XOR
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) AND C, A XOR (B AND C), A XOR B AND C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where (A XOR (B AND C)) != (A XOR B AND C);
+select A, B, C, (A AND B) XOR C, A AND (B XOR C), A AND B XOR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where ((A AND B) XOR C) != (A AND B XOR C);
+
+--echo Testing that XOR has precedence over OR
+select A, B, C, (A XOR B) OR C, A XOR (B OR C), A XOR B OR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where ((A XOR B) OR C) != (A XOR B OR C);
+select A, B, C, (A OR B) XOR C, A OR (B XOR C), A OR B XOR C
+ from t1_30237_bool order by A, B, C;
+select count(*) from t1_30237_bool
+ where (A OR (B XOR C)) != (A OR B XOR C);
+
+drop table t1_30237_bool;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT has precedence over OR
+select (NOT FALSE) OR TRUE, NOT (FALSE OR TRUE), NOT FALSE OR TRUE;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT has precedence over XOR
+select (NOT FALSE) XOR FALSE, NOT (FALSE XOR FALSE), NOT FALSE XOR FALSE;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT has precedence over AND
+select (NOT FALSE) AND FALSE, NOT (FALSE AND FALSE), NOT FALSE AND FALSE;
+
+--echo Testing that NOT is associative
+select NOT NOT TRUE, NOT NOT NOT FALSE;
+
+--echo Testing that IS has precedence over NOT
+select (NOT NULL) IS TRUE, NOT (NULL IS TRUE), NOT NULL IS TRUE;
+select (NOT NULL) IS NOT TRUE, NOT (NULL IS NOT TRUE), NOT NULL IS NOT TRUE;
+select (NOT NULL) IS FALSE, NOT (NULL IS FALSE), NOT NULL IS FALSE;
+select (NOT NULL) IS NOT FALSE, NOT (NULL IS NOT FALSE), NOT NULL IS NOT FALSE;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS UNKNOWN, NOT (TRUE IS UNKNOWN), NOT TRUE IS UNKNOWN;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NOT UNKNOWN, NOT (TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN), NOT TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NULL, NOT (TRUE IS NULL), NOT TRUE IS NULL;
+select (NOT TRUE) IS NOT NULL, NOT (TRUE IS NOT NULL), NOT TRUE IS NOT NULL;
+
+--echo Testing that IS [NOT] TRUE/FALSE/UNKNOWN predicates are not associative
+# Documenting existing behavior in 5.0.48
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select TRUE IS TRUE IS TRUE IS TRUE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select FALSE IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE IS NOT TRUE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select NULL IS FALSE IS FALSE IS FALSE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select TRUE IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE IS NOT FALSE;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select FALSE IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN IS UNKNOWN;
+-- error ER_PARSE_ERROR
+select TRUE IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN IS NOT UNKNOWN;
+
+--echo Testing that IS [NOT] NULL predicates are associative
+# Documenting existing behavior in 5.0.48
+select FALSE IS NULL IS NULL IS NULL;
+select TRUE IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL IS NOT NULL;
+
+--echo Testing that comparison operators are left associative
+select 1 <=> 2 <=> 2, (1 <=> 2) <=> 2, 1 <=> (2 <=> 2);
+select 1 = 2 = 2, (1 = 2) = 2, 1 = (2 = 2);
+select 1 != 2 != 3, (1 != 2) != 3, 1 != (2 != 3);
+select 1 <> 2 <> 3, (1 <> 2) <> 3, 1 <> (2 <> 3);
+select 1 < 2 < 3, (1 < 2) < 3, 1 < (2 < 3);
+select 3 <= 2 <= 1, (3 <= 2) <= 1, 3 <= (2 <= 1);
+select 1 > 2 > 3, (1 > 2) > 3, 1 > (2 > 3);
+select 1 >= 2 >= 3, (1 >= 2) >= 3, 1 >= (2 >= 3);
+
+-- echo Testing that | is associative
+select 0xF0 | 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 | 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 | (0x0F | 0x55);
+
+-- echo Testing that & is associative
+select 0xF5 & 0x5F & 0x55, (0xF5 & 0x5F) & 0x55, 0xF5 & (0x5F & 0x55);
+
+-- echo Testing that << is left associative
+select 4 << 3 << 2, (4 << 3) << 2, 4 << (3 << 2);
+
+-- echo Testing that >> is left associative
+select 256 >> 3 >> 2, (256 >> 3) >> 2, 256 >> (3 >> 2);
+
+--echo Testing that & has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 & 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 & 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 & (0x0F | 0x55);
+select 0x55 | 0xF0 & 0x0F, (0x55 | 0xF0) & 0x0F, 0x55 | (0xF0 & 0x0F);
+
+--echo Testing that << has precedence over |
+select 0x0F << 4 | 0x0F, (0x0F << 4) | 0x0F, 0x0F << (4 | 0x0F);
+select 0x0F | 0x0F << 4, (0x0F | 0x0F) << 4, 0x0F | (0x0F << 4);
+
+--echo Testing that >> has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 >> 4 | 0xFF, (0xF0 >> 4) | 0xFF, 0xF0 >> (4 | 0xFF);
+select 0xFF | 0xF0 >> 4, (0xFF | 0xF0) >> 4, 0xFF | (0xF0 >> 4);
+
+--echo Testing that << has precedence over &
+select 0x0F << 4 & 0xF0, (0x0F << 4) & 0xF0, 0x0F << (4 & 0xF0);
+select 0xF0 & 0x0F << 4, (0xF0 & 0x0F) << 4, 0xF0 & (0x0F << 4);
+
+--echo Testing that >> has precedence over &
+select 0xF0 >> 4 & 0x55, (0xF0 >> 4) & 0x55, 0xF0 >> (4 & 0x55);
+select 0x0F & 0xF0 >> 4, (0x0F & 0xF0) >> 4, 0x0F & (0xF0 >> 4);
+
+--echo Testing that >> and << have the same precedence
+select 0xFF >> 4 << 2, (0xFF >> 4) << 2, 0xFF >> (4 << 2);
+select 0x0F << 4 >> 2, (0x0F << 4) >> 2, 0x0F << (4 >> 2);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + is associative
+select 1 + 2 + 3, (1 + 2) + 3, 1 + (2 + 3);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - is left associative
+select 1 - 2 - 3, (1 - 2) - 3, 1 - (2 - 3);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + and binary - have the same precedence
+# evaluated left to right
+select 1 + 2 - 3, (1 + 2) - 3, 1 + (2 - 3);
+select 1 - 2 + 3, (1 - 2) + 3, 1 - (2 + 3);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over |
+select 0xF0 + 0x0F | 0x55, (0xF0 + 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xF0 + (0x0F | 0x55);
+select 0x55 | 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0x55 | 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0x55 | (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over &
+select 0xF0 + 0x0F & 0x55, (0xF0 + 0x0F) & 0x55, 0xF0 + (0x0F & 0x55);
+select 0x55 & 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0x55 & 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0x55 & (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over <<
+select 2 + 3 << 4, (2 + 3) << 4, 2 + (3 << 4);
+select 3 << 4 + 2, (3 << 4) + 2, 3 << (4 + 2);
+
+--echo Testing that binary + has precedence over >>
+select 4 + 3 >> 2, (4 + 3) >> 2, 4 + (3 >> 2);
+select 3 >> 2 + 1, (3 >> 2) + 1, 3 >> (2 + 1);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over |
+select 0xFF - 0x0F | 0x55, (0xFF - 0x0F) | 0x55, 0xFF - (0x0F | 0x55);
+select 0x55 | 0xFF - 0xF0, (0x55 | 0xFF) - 0xF0, 0x55 | (0xFF - 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over &
+select 0xFF - 0xF0 & 0x55, (0xFF - 0xF0) & 0x55, 0xFF - (0xF0 & 0x55);
+select 0x55 & 0xFF - 0xF0, (0x55 & 0xFF) - 0xF0, 0x55 & (0xFF - 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over <<
+select 16 - 3 << 2, (16 - 3) << 2, 16 - (3 << 2);
+select 4 << 3 - 2, (4 << 3) - 2, 4 << (3 - 2);
+
+--echo Testing that binary - has precedence over >>
+select 16 - 3 >> 2, (16 - 3) >> 2, 16 - (3 >> 2);
+select 16 >> 3 - 2, (16 >> 3) - 2, 16 >> (3 - 2);
+
+--echo Testing that * is associative
+select 2 * 3 * 4, (2 * 3) * 4, 2 * (3 * 4);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over |
+select 2 * 0x40 | 0x0F, (2 * 0x40) | 0x0F, 2 * (0x40 | 0x0F);
+select 0x0F | 2 * 0x40, (0x0F | 2) * 0x40, 0x0F | (2 * 0x40);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over &
+select 2 * 0x40 & 0x55, (2 * 0x40) & 0x55, 2 * (0x40 & 0x55);
+select 0xF0 & 2 * 0x40, (0xF0 & 2) * 0x40, 0xF0 & (2 * 0x40);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over <<
+# Actually, can't prove it for the first case,
+# since << is a multiplication by a power of 2,
+# and * is associative
+select 5 * 3 << 4, (5 * 3) << 4, 5 * (3 << 4);
+select 2 << 3 * 4, (2 << 3) * 4, 2 << (3 * 4);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over >>
+# >> is a multiplication by a (negative) power of 2,
+# see above.
+select 3 * 4 >> 2, (3 * 4) >> 2, 3 * (4 >> 2);
+select 4 >> 2 * 3, (4 >> 2) * 3, 4 >> (2 * 3);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over binary +
+select 2 * 3 + 4, (2 * 3) + 4, 2 * (3 + 4);
+select 2 + 3 * 4, (2 + 3) * 4, 2 + (3 * 4);
+
+--echo Testing that * has precedence over binary -
+select 4 * 3 - 2, (4 * 3) - 2, 4 * (3 - 2);
+select 4 - 3 * 2, (4 - 3) * 2, 4 - (3 * 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / is left associative
+select 15 / 5 / 3, (15 / 5) / 3, 15 / (5 / 3);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over |
+select 105 / 5 | 2, (105 / 5) | 2, 105 / (5 | 2);
+select 105 | 2 / 5, (105 | 2) / 5, 105 | (2 / 5);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over &
+select 105 / 5 & 0x0F, (105 / 5) & 0x0F, 105 / (5 & 0x0F);
+select 0x0F & 105 / 5, (0x0F & 105) / 5, 0x0F & (105 / 5);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over <<
+select 0x80 / 4 << 2, (0x80 / 4) << 2, 0x80 / (4 << 2);
+select 0x80 << 4 / 2, (0x80 << 4) / 2, 0x80 << (4 / 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over >>
+select 0x80 / 4 >> 2, (0x80 / 4) >> 2, 0x80 / (4 >> 2);
+select 0x80 >> 4 / 2, (0x80 >> 4) / 2, 0x80 >> (4 / 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over binary +
+select 0x80 / 2 + 2, (0x80 / 2) + 2, 0x80 / (2 + 2);
+select 0x80 + 2 / 2, (0x80 + 2) / 2, 0x80 + (2 / 2);
+
+--echo Testing that / has precedence over binary -
+select 0x80 / 4 - 2, (0x80 / 4) - 2, 0x80 / (4 - 2);
+select 0x80 - 4 / 2, (0x80 - 4) / 2, 0x80 - (4 / 2);
+
+# TODO: %, DIV, MOD
+
+--echo Testing that ^ is associative
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x0F);
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 ^ 0x55, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) ^ 0x55, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 ^ 0x55);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over |
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 | 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) | 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 | 0x0F);
+select 0xF0 | 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0xF0 | 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0xF0 | (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over &
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 & 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) & 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 & 0x0F);
+select 0x0F & 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0x0F & 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0x0F & (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over <<
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 << 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) << 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 << 2);
+select 0x0F << 2 ^ 0xFF, (0x0F << 2) ^ 0xFF, 0x0F << (2 ^ 0xFF);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over >>
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 >> 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) >> 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 >> 2);
+select 0xFF >> 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF >> 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF >> (2 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over binary +
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 + 0x0F, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) + 0x0F, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 + 0x0F);
+select 0x0F + 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (0x0F + 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 0x0F + (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over binary -
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 - 1, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) - 1, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 - 1);
+select 0x55 - 0x0F ^ 0x55, (0x55 - 0x0F) ^ 0x55, 0x55 - (0x0F ^ 0x55);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over *
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 * 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) * 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 * 2);
+select 2 * 0xFF ^ 0xF0, (2 * 0xFF) ^ 0xF0, 2 * (0xFF ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over /
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 / 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) / 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 / 2);
+select 0xF2 / 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xF2 / 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xF2 / (2 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over %
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 % 0x20, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) % 0x20, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 % 0x20);
+select 0xFF % 0x20 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF % 0x20) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF % (0x20 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over DIV
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 DIV 2, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) DIV 2, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 DIV 2);
+select 0xF2 DIV 2 ^ 0xF0, (0xF2 DIV 2) ^ 0xF0, 0xF2 DIV (2 ^ 0xF0);
+
+--echo Testing that ^ has precedence over MOD
+select 0xFF ^ 0xF0 MOD 0x20, (0xFF ^ 0xF0) MOD 0x20, 0xFF ^ (0xF0 MOD 0x20);
+select 0xFF MOD 0x20 ^ 0xF0, (0xFF MOD 0x20) ^ 0xF0, 0xFF MOD (0x20 ^ 0xF0);
+
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/sp-error.test b/mysql-test/t/sp-error.test
index ef9bed8b789..012f2b33225 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/sp-error.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/sp-error.test
@@ -1387,6 +1387,21 @@ CREATE TRIGGER tr1 BEFORE INSERT ON t1 FOR EACH ROW BEGIN create user 'mysqltest
CREATE FUNCTION bug_13627_f() returns int BEGIN create user 'mysqltest_1'; return 1; END |
-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
+CREATE TRIGGER bug21975 BEFORE INSERT ON t1 FOR EACH ROW BEGIN grant select on t1 to 'mysqltest_1'; END |
+-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
+CREATE FUNCTION bug21975() returns int BEGIN grant select on t1 to 'mysqltest_1'; return 1; END |
+
+-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
+CREATE TRIGGER bug21975 BEFORE INSERT ON t1 FOR EACH ROW BEGIN revoke select on t1 from 'mysqltest_1'; END |
+-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
+CREATE FUNCTION bug21975() returns int BEGIN revoke select on t1 from 'mysqltest_1'; return 1; END |
+
+-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
+CREATE TRIGGER bug21975 BEFORE INSERT ON t1 FOR EACH ROW BEGIN revoke all privileges on *.* from 'mysqltest_1'; END |
+-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
+CREATE FUNCTION bug21975() returns int BEGIN revoke all privileges on *.* from 'mysqltest_1'; return 1; END |
+
+-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
CREATE TRIGGER tr1 BEFORE INSERT ON t1 FOR EACH ROW BEGIN drop user 'mysqltest_1'; END |
-- error ER_COMMIT_NOT_ALLOWED_IN_SF_OR_TRG
CREATE FUNCTION bug_13627_f() returns int BEGIN drop user 'mysqltest_1'; return 1; END |
diff --git a/mysql-test/t/sp.test b/mysql-test/t/sp.test
index 46ef6bc6ddd..1c8f1ca51c2 100644
--- a/mysql-test/t/sp.test
+++ b/mysql-test/t/sp.test
@@ -7494,4 +7494,123 @@ DROP FUNCTION f1;
DROP FUNCTION f2;
DROP TABLE t1;
+#
+# Bug#29936 Stored Procedure DML ignores low_priority_updates setting
+#
+
+--disable_warnings
+drop table if exists t1;
+drop procedure if exists p1;
+--enable_warnings
+
+create table t1 (value varchar(15));
+create procedure p1() update t1 set value='updated' where value='old';
+
+# load the procedure into sp cache and execute once
+call p1();
+
+insert into t1 (value) values ("old");
+
+connect (rl_holder, localhost, root,,);
+connect (rl_acquirer, localhost, root,,);
+connect (rl_contender, localhost, root,,);
+connect (rl_wait, localhost, root,,);
+
+connection rl_holder;
+select get_lock('b26162',120);
+
+connection rl_acquirer;
+--send select 'rl_acquirer', value from t1 where get_lock('b26162',120);
+
+# we must wait till this select opens and locks the tables
+connection rl_wait;
+let $wait_condition=
+ select count(*) = 1 from information_schema.processlist
+ where state = "User lock" and
+ info = "select 'rl_acquirer', value from t1 where get_lock('b26162',120)";
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+
+connection default;
+set session low_priority_updates=on;
+--send call p1();
+
+connection rl_wait;
+let $wait_condition=
+ select count(*) = 1 from information_schema.processlist
+ where state = "Locked" and
+ info = "update t1 set value='updated' where value='old'";
+--source include/wait_condition.inc
+
+connection rl_contender;
+select 'rl_contender', value from t1;
+
+connection rl_holder;
+select release_lock('b26162');
+
+connection rl_acquirer;
+--reap
+connection default;
+--reap
+
+disconnect rl_holder;
+disconnect rl_acquirer;
+disconnect rl_wait;
+drop procedure p1;
+drop table t1;
+set session low_priority_updates=default;
+
+#
+# Bug#13675: DATETIME/DATE type in store proc param seems to be converted as
+# varbinary
+#
+
+--echo
+--echo # Bug#13675.
+--echo
+
+--disable_warnings
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS p1;
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS p2;
+
+DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
+--enable_warnings
+
+--echo
+
+CREATE PROCEDURE p1(v DATETIME) CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT v;
+
+CREATE PROCEDURE p2(v INT) CREATE TABLE t1 SELECT v;
+
+--echo
+CALL p1(NOW());
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+CALL p1('text');
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+CALL p2(10);
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+CALL p2('text');
+SHOW CREATE TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP TABLE t1;
+
+--echo
+DROP PROCEDURE p1;
+DROP PROCEDURE p2;
+
--echo End of 5.0 tests