summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/parallel/test-http-request-invalid-method-error.js
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* test: refactor common.expectsErrorRuben Bridgewater2019-12-311-3/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This completely refactors the `expectsError` behavior: so far it's almost identical to `assert.throws(fn, object)` in case it was used with a function as first argument. It had a magical property check that allowed to verify a functions `type` in case `type` was passed used in the validation object. This pattern is now completely removed and `assert.throws()` should be used instead. The main intent for `common.expectsError()` is to verify error cases for callback based APIs. This is now more flexible by accepting all validation possibilites that `assert.throws()` accepts as well. No magical properties exist anymore. This reduces surprising behavior for developers who are not used to the Node.js core code base. This has the side effect that `common` is used significantly less frequent. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31092 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
* test: replace assert.throws w/ common.expectsErrorMithun Sasidharan2017-12-081-4/+3
| | | | | | | PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17497 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* errors: migrate _http_outgoingWeijia Wang2017-08-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14735 Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
* http_client, errors: migrate to internal/errorsWeijia Wang2017-08-011-3/+6
| | | | | | | | | PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14423 Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/11273 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
* lib,src: fix consistent spacing inside bracesSebastiaan Deckers2017-07-211-1/+1
| | | | | | | | PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/14162 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
* test: change common.expectsError() signatureRich Trott2017-02-271-1/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | One downside to `common.expectsError()` is that it increases the abstractions people have to learn about in order to work with even simple tests. Whereas before, all they had to know about is `assert.throws()`, now they have to *also* know about `common.expectsError()`. This is very different (IMO) from `common.mustCall()` in that the latter has an intuitively understandable name, accepts arguments as one would expect, and (in most cases) doesn't actually require reading documentation or code to figure out what it's doing. With `common.expectsError()`, there's a fair bit of magic. Like, it's not obvious what the first argument would be. Or the second. Or the third. You just have to know. This PR changes the arguments accepted by `common.expectsError()` to a single settings object. Someone coming across this has a hope of understanding what's going on without reading source or docs: ```js const validatorFunction = common.expectsError({code: 'ELOOP', type: Error, message: 'foo'}); ``` This, by comparison, is harder to grok: ```js const validatorFunction = common.expectsError('ELOOP', Error, 'foo'); ``` And this is especially wat-inducing: ```js common.expectsError(undefined, undefined, 'looped doodad found'); ``` It's likely that only people who work with tests frequently can be expected to remember the three arguments and their order. By comparison, remembering that the error code is `code` and the message is `message` might be manageable. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11512 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yuta Hiroto <hello@about-hiroppy.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* test: use common.expectsError()Rich Trott2017-02-171-5/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | Use common.expectsError() instead of rolling own validation function in test-http-request-invalid-method-error.js. common.expectsError() didn't exist when the test was written, but now it does. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/11408 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
* test: test for http.request() invalid method errorAshton Kinslow2016-12-031-0/+12
Adds a test for when an invalid http method is passed into http.request() to verify an error is thrown, that the error is the correct type, and the error message is correct. PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/10080 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>