diff options
author | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi> | 2016-09-18 17:43:32 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de> | 2016-09-18 17:43:32 +0200 |
commit | ded42dff6bf0d2fbc3f423e42e1da51281e9d70e (patch) | |
tree | b6041933785f19bbe2666471be9612733719da23 /TODO | |
parent | b0c92eb4132ecce84b97255baccb7f2202895f57 (diff) | |
download | open-iscsi-ded42dff6bf0d2fbc3f423e42e1da51281e9d70e.tar.gz |
Spelling fixes
Diffstat (limited to 'TODO')
-rw-r--r-- | TODO | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ libiscsi_tcp will call iscsi_tcp_get_curr_r2t and grab the session lock in the xmit path from the xmit thread and then in the recv path libiscsi_tcp/iscsi_tcp will call iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp (this function is called with the session lock held). We could add a new per iscsi_task lock and -use that to gaurd the R2T. +use that to guard the R2T. 2. For iscsi_tcp and cxgb*i, libiscsi uses the session->cmdqueue linked list and the session lock to queue IO from the queuecommand function (run from @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ there. We can only use something that is upstream though. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Improve the iscsi driver logging. Each driver has a different -way to control logging. We should unify them and make it managable +way to control logging. We should unify them and make it manageable by iscsiadm. So each driver would use a common format, there would be a common kernel interface to set the logging level, etc. @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ time, we might not be abe to allocate a page for the login commands buffer. To work around the problem the initiator prealloctes a 8K (sometimes more depending on the page size) buffer for each session (see iscsi_conn_setup' s __get_free_pages call). This is obviously very wasteful since it will be -a rate occurance. Can we think of a way to allow multiple sessions to +a rare occurrence. Can we think of a way to allow multiple sessions to be relogged in at the same time, but not have to preallocate so many buffers? |