summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ofproto/netflow.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJustin Pettit <jpettit@nicira.com>2010-10-12 11:24:04 -0700
committerJustin Pettit <jpettit@nicira.com>2010-10-12 11:33:16 -0700
commitc06955bc63bf504fc6fa87fd9780993bc45cad09 (patch)
tree1f12a506ed8f9c3420122e06cb1554f27b42be9c /ofproto/netflow.c
parentf1670a487adf5d5352eaf32f15bcf2958cdb1771 (diff)
downloadopenvswitch-c06955bc63bf504fc6fa87fd9780993bc45cad09.tar.gz
netflow: Back-out optimization that could lead to infinite loop
Commit 924282 (netflow: Do 64-bit division less often.) attempted to remove the 64-bit division used to break flow records with large byte counts into multiple NetFlow records. The calculation to determine the number of records was incorrect and should have shifted "byte_delta" by 31 instead of 32. This commit reverts the change (while keeping commit f22a24 (netflow: Avoid (theoretically) looping 2**32 times.) ), since the logic is more straight-forward than the optimized version. Bug #3813
Diffstat (limited to 'ofproto/netflow.c')
-rw-r--r--ofproto/netflow.c7
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/ofproto/netflow.c b/ofproto/netflow.c
index 4881c5fdb..d9f52ba5f 100644
--- a/ofproto/netflow.c
+++ b/ofproto/netflow.c
@@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ netflow_expire(struct netflow *nf, struct netflow_flow *nf_flow,
* traffic. We try to evenly distribute the packet and byte counters,
* so that the bytes-per-packet lengths don't look wonky across the
* records. */
- while (byte_delta > UINT32_MAX) {
- uint32_t n_recs = byte_delta >> 32;
+ while (byte_delta) {
+ int n_recs = (byte_delta + UINT32_MAX - 1) / UINT32_MAX;
uint32_t pkt_count = pkt_delta / n_recs;
uint32_t byte_count = byte_delta / n_recs;
@@ -200,9 +200,6 @@ netflow_expire(struct netflow *nf, struct netflow_flow *nf_flow,
pkt_delta -= pkt_count;
byte_delta -= byte_count;
}
- if (byte_delta > 0) {
- gen_netflow_rec(nf, nf_flow, expired, pkt_delta, byte_delta);
- }
} else {
/* In 600 seconds, a 10GbE link can theoretically transmit 75 * 10**10
* == 175 * 2**32 bytes. The byte counter is bigger than that, so it's