blob: cd51d97006918f0d427dc4c7b9d0947716a4d190 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
|
From 517f6e2641a2802dce5a5aa0d18c7d37a35678d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:26:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of
pm_runtime_get_sync
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429162701.2222-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
+++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
@@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(co
goto err_clk_rate_set;
}
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev);
if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev);
dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n");
goto err_reg_enable;
}
|
