summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ext
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYves Orton <demerphq@gmail.com>2022-11-29 12:00:31 +0100
committerYves Orton <demerphq@gmail.com>2022-11-30 12:10:04 +0100
commitce3819cf202a3c5c172fdfaee0412bb5576cf2c7 (patch)
tree7c94a83b003c4f47bddc1022c37e0d237fd41e06 /ext
parentc9c8e2368deb1a7e6bbeb67711f2706517c0f092 (diff)
downloadperl-ce3819cf202a3c5c172fdfaee0412bb5576cf2c7.tar.gz
perl.c - move PL_restartop assert out of perl_run()
In dd66b1d793 we added an assert to perl_run() that PL_restartop should never be true when perl_run() is called after perl_parse(). Looked at from the point of the internals, which calls perl_parse() and perl_run() exactly once, this made sense. It turns out however that there is at least one XS module out there that expects to be able to set PL_restartop and then call perl_run(). If that works out for them then we shouldn't block it, as we aren't really trying to say "perl_run() should never be called with PL_restartop set" (at least this assert wasn't trying to say that really), we are trying to assert "between the top level transition from perl_parse() to perl_run() we shouldnt leak any PL_restartop". One could argue the assert maybe should go at the end of perl_parse(), but I chose to put it in Miniperl.pm and thus into perlmain.c and miniperlmain.c as I am not certain that perl_parse() should never be called with PL_restartop set already, and putting it in the main code really does more closely reflect the intent of this assert anyway. This was reported as Blead Breaks CPAN Github Issue #20557.
Diffstat (limited to 'ext')
-rw-r--r--ext/ExtUtils-Miniperl/lib/ExtUtils/Miniperl.pm25
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/ext/ExtUtils-Miniperl/lib/ExtUtils/Miniperl.pm b/ext/ExtUtils-Miniperl/lib/ExtUtils/Miniperl.pm
index 38a37244e2..18627f8a5e 100644
--- a/ext/ExtUtils-Miniperl/lib/ExtUtils/Miniperl.pm
+++ b/ext/ExtUtils-Miniperl/lib/ExtUtils/Miniperl.pm
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use Exporter 'import';
use ExtUtils::Embed 1.31, qw(xsi_header xsi_protos xsi_body);
our @EXPORT = qw(writemain);
-our $VERSION = '1.12';
+our $VERSION = '1.13';
# blead will run this with miniperl, hence we can't use autodie or File::Temp
my $temp;
@@ -135,8 +135,29 @@ main(int argc, char **argv, char **env)
PL_perl_destruct_level = 0;
}
PL_exit_flags |= PERL_EXIT_DESTRUCT_END;
- if (!perl_parse(my_perl, xs_init, argc, argv, (char **)NULL))
+ if (!perl_parse(my_perl, xs_init, argc, argv, (char **)NULL)) {
+
+ /* perl_parse() may end up starting its own run loops, which
+ * might end up "leaking" PL_restartop from the parse phase into
+ * the run phase which then ends up confusing run_body(). This
+ * leakage shouldn't happen and if it does its a bug.
+ *
+ * Note we do not do this assert in perl_run() or perl_parse()
+ * as there are modules out there which explicitly set
+ * PL_restartop before calling perl_run() directly from XS code
+ * (Coro), and it is conceivable PL_restartop could be set prior
+ * to calling perl_parse() by XS code as well.
+ *
+ * What we want to check is that the top level perl_parse(),
+ * perl_run() pairing does not allow a leaking PL_restartop, as
+ * that indicates a bug in perl. By putting the assert here we
+ * can validate that Perl itself is operating correctly without
+ * risking breakage to XS code under DEBUGGING. - Yves
+ */
+ assert(!PL_restartop);
+
perl_run(my_perl);
+ }
#ifndef PERL_MICRO
/* Unregister our signal handler before destroying my_perl */