diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Pod/Simple/t/perlfaq3.pod')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Pod/Simple/t/perlfaq3.pod | 814 |
1 files changed, 814 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Pod/Simple/t/perlfaq3.pod b/lib/Pod/Simple/t/perlfaq3.pod new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..49cae1a209 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/Pod/Simple/t/perlfaq3.pod @@ -0,0 +1,814 @@ +=head1 NAME + +perlfaq3 - Programming Tools ($Revision: 1.38 $, $Date: 1999/05/23 16:08:30 $) + +=head1 DESCRIPTION + +This section of the FAQ answers questions related to programmer tools +and programming support. + +=head2 How do I do (anything)? + +Have you looked at CPAN (see L<perlfaq2>)? The chances are that +someone has already written a module that can solve your problem. +Have you read the appropriate man pages? Here's a brief index: + + Basics perldata, perlvar, perlsyn, perlop, perlsub + Execution perlrun, perldebug + Functions perlfunc + Objects perlref, perlmod, perlobj, perltie + Data Structures perlref, perllol, perldsc + Modules perlmod, perlmodlib, perlsub + Regexes perlre, perlfunc, perlop, perllocale + Moving to perl5 perltrap, perl + Linking w/C perlxstut, perlxs, perlcall, perlguts, perlembed + Various http://www.perl.com/CPAN/doc/FMTEYEWTK/index.html + (not a man-page but still useful) + +A crude table of contents for the Perl man page set is found in L<perltoc>. + +=head2 How can I use Perl interactively? + +The typical approach uses the Perl debugger, described in the +perldebug(1) man page, on an ``empty'' program, like this: + + perl -de 42 + +Now just type in any legal Perl code, and it will be immediately +evaluated. You can also examine the symbol table, get stack +backtraces, check variable values, set breakpoints, and other +operations typically found in symbolic debuggers. + +=head2 Is there a Perl shell? + +In general, no. The Shell.pm module (distributed with Perl) makes +Perl try commands which aren't part of the Perl language as shell +commands. perlsh from the source distribution is simplistic and +uninteresting, but may still be what you want. + +=head2 How do I debug my Perl programs? + +Have you tried C<use warnings> or used C<-w>? They enable warnings +to detect dubious practices. + +Have you tried C<use strict>? It prevents you from using symbolic +references, makes you predeclare any subroutines that you call as bare +words, and (probably most importantly) forces you to predeclare your +variables with C<my>, C<our>, or C<use vars>. + +Did you check the return values of each and every system call? The operating +system (and thus Perl) tells you whether they worked, and if not +why. + + open(FH, "> /etc/cantwrite") + or die "Couldn't write to /etc/cantwrite: $!\n"; + +Did you read L<perltrap>? It's full of gotchas for old and new Perl +programmers and even has sections for those of you who are upgrading +from languages like I<awk> and I<C>. + +Have you tried the Perl debugger, described in L<perldebug>? You can +step through your program and see what it's doing and thus work out +why what it's doing isn't what it should be doing. + +=head2 How do I profile my Perl programs? + +You should get the Devel::DProf module from the standard distribution +(or separately on CPAN) and also use Benchmark.pm from the standard +distribution. The Benchmark module lets you time specific portions of +your code, while Devel::DProf gives detailed breakdowns of where your +code spends its time. + +Here's a sample use of Benchmark: + + use Benchmark; + + @junk = `cat /etc/motd`; + $count = 10_000; + + timethese($count, { + 'map' => sub { my @a = @junk; + map { s/a/b/ } @a; + return @a + }, + 'for' => sub { my @a = @junk; + local $_; + for (@a) { s/a/b/ }; + return @a }, + }); + +This is what it prints (on one machine--your results will be dependent +on your hardware, operating system, and the load on your machine): + + Benchmark: timing 10000 iterations of for, map... + for: 4 secs ( 3.97 usr 0.01 sys = 3.98 cpu) + map: 6 secs ( 4.97 usr 0.00 sys = 4.97 cpu) + +Be aware that a good benchmark is very hard to write. It only tests the +data you give it and proves little about the differing complexities +of contrasting algorithms. + +=head2 How do I cross-reference my Perl programs? + +The B::Xref module, shipped with the new, alpha-release Perl compiler +(not the general distribution prior to the 5.005 release), can be used +to generate cross-reference reports for Perl programs. + + perl -MO=Xref[,OPTIONS] scriptname.plx + +=head2 Is there a pretty-printer (formatter) for Perl? + +There is no program that will reformat Perl as much as indent(1) does +for C. The complex feedback between the scanner and the parser (this +feedback is what confuses the vgrind and emacs programs) makes it +challenging at best to write a stand-alone Perl parser. + +Of course, if you simply follow the guidelines in L<perlstyle>, you +shouldn't need to reformat. The habit of formatting your code as you +write it will help prevent bugs. Your editor can and should help you +with this. The perl-mode or newer cperl-mode for emacs can provide +remarkable amounts of help with most (but not all) code, and even less +programmable editors can provide significant assistance. Tom swears +by the following settings in vi and its clones: + + set ai sw=4 + map! ^O {^M}^[O^T + +Now put that in your F<.exrc> file (replacing the caret characters +with control characters) and away you go. In insert mode, ^T is +for indenting, ^D is for undenting, and ^O is for blockdenting-- +as it were. If you haven't used the last one, you're missing +a lot. A more complete example, with comments, can be found at +http://www.perl.com/CPAN-local/authors/id/TOMC/scripts/toms.exrc.gz + +If you are used to using the I<vgrind> program for printing out nice code +to a laser printer, you can take a stab at this using +http://www.perl.com/CPAN/doc/misc/tips/working.vgrind.entry, but the +results are not particularly satisfying for sophisticated code. + +The a2ps at http://www.infres.enst.fr/%7Edemaille/a2ps/ does lots of things +related to generating nicely printed output of documents. + +=head2 Is there a ctags for Perl? + +There's a simple one at +http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/id/TOMC/scripts/ptags.gz which may do +the trick. And if not, it's easy to hack into what you want. + +=head2 Is there an IDE or Windows Perl Editor? + +Perl programs are just plain text, so any editor will do. + +If you're on Unix, you already have an IDE--Unix itself. The UNIX +philosophy is the philosophy of several small tools that each do one +thing and do it well. It's like a carpenter's toolbox. + +If you want a Windows IDE, check the following: + +=over 4 + +=item CodeMagicCD + +http://www.codemagiccd.com/ + +=item Komodo + +ActiveState's cross-platform, multi-language IDE has Perl support, +including a regular expression debugger and remote debugging +(http://www.ActiveState.com/Products/Komodo/index.html). +(Visual Perl, a Visual Studio.NET plug-in is currently (early 2001) +in beta (http://www.ActiveState.com/Products/VisualPerl/index.html)). + +=item The Object System + +(http://www.castlelink.co.uk/object_system/) is a Perl web +applications development IDE. + +=item PerlBuilder + +(http://www.solutionsoft.com/perl.htm) is an integrated development +environment for Windows that supports Perl development. + +=item Perl code magic + +(http://www.petes-place.com/codemagic.html). + +=item visiPerl+ + +http://helpconsulting.net/visiperl/, from Help Consulting. + +=back + +For editors: if you're on Unix you probably have vi or a vi clone already, +and possibly an emacs too, so you may not need to download anything. +In any emacs the cperl-mode (M-x cperl-mode) gives you perhaps the +best available Perl editing mode in any editor. + +For Windows editors: you can download an Emacs + +=over 4 + +=item GNU Emacs + +http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ntemacs.html + +=item MicroEMACS + +http://members.nbci.com/uemacs/ + +=item XEmacs + +http://www.xemacs.org/Download/index.html + +=back + +or a vi clone such as + +=over 4 + +=item Elvis + +ftp://ftp.cs.pdx.edu/pub/elvis/ http://www.fh-wedel.de/elvis/ + +=item Vile + +http://vile.cx/ + +=item Vim + +http://www.vim.org/ + +win32: http://www.cs.vu.nl/%7Etmgil/vi.html + +=back + +For vi lovers in general, Windows or elsewhere: +http://www.thomer.com/thomer/vi/vi.html. + +nvi (http://www.bostic.com/vi/, available from CPAN in src/misc/) is +yet another vi clone, unfortunately not available for Windows, but in +UNIX platforms you might be interested in trying it out, firstly because +strictly speaking it is not a vi clone, it is the real vi, or the new +incarnation of it, and secondly because you can embed Perl inside it +to use Perl as the scripting language. nvi is not alone in this, +though: at least also vim and vile offer an embedded Perl. + +The following are Win32 multilanguage editor/IDESs that support Perl: + +=over 4 + +=item Codewright + +http://www.starbase.com/ + +=item MultiEdit + +http://www.MultiEdit.com/ + +=item SlickEdit + +http://www.slickedit.com/ + +=back + +There is also a toyedit Text widget based editor written in Perl +that is distributed with the Tk module on CPAN. The ptkdb +(http://world.std.com/~aep/ptkdb/) is a Perl/tk based debugger that +acts as a development environment of sorts. Perl Composer +(http://perlcomposer.sourceforge.net/vperl.html) is an IDE for Perl/Tk +GUI creation. + +In addition to an editor/IDE you might be interested in a more +powerful shell environment for Win32. Your options include + +=over 4 + +=item Bash + +from the Cygwin package (http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/) + +=item Ksh + +from the MKS Toolkit (http://www.mks.com/), or the Bourne shell of +the U/WIN environment (http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/uwin/) + +=item Tcsh + +ftp://ftp.astron.com/pub/tcsh/, see also +http://www.primate.wisc.edu/software/csh-tcsh-book/ + +=item Zsh + +ftp://ftp.blarg.net/users/amol/zsh/, see also http://www.zsh.org/ + +=back + +MKS and U/WIN are commercial (U/WIN is free for educational and +research purposes), Cygwin is covered by the GNU Public License (but +that shouldn't matter for Perl use). The Cygwin, MKS, and U/WIN all +contain (in addition to the shells) a comprehensive set of standard +UNIX toolkit utilities. + +If you're transferring text files between Unix and Windows using FTP +be sure to transfer them in ASCII mode so the ends of lines are +appropriately converted. + +On Mac OS the MacPerl Application comes with a simple 32k text editor +that behaves like a rudimentary IDE. In contrast to the MacPerl Application +the MPW Perl tool can make use of the MPW Shell itself as an editor (with +no 32k limit). + +=over 4 + +=item BBEdit and BBEdit Lite + +are text editors for Mac OS that have a Perl sensitivity mode +(http://web.barebones.com/). + +=item Alpha + +is an editor, written and extensible in Tcl, that nonetheless has +built in support for several popular markup and programming languages +including Perl and HTML (http://alpha.olm.net/). + +=back + +Pepper and Pe are programming language sensitive text editors for Mac +OS X and BeOS respectively (http://www.hekkelman.com/). + +=head2 Where can I get Perl macros for vi? + +For a complete version of Tom Christiansen's vi configuration file, +see http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Tom_Christiansen/scripts/toms.exrc.gz , +the standard benchmark file for vi emulators. The file runs best with nvi, +the current version of vi out of Berkeley, which incidentally can be built +with an embedded Perl interpreter--see http://www.perl.com/CPAN/src/misc. + +=head2 Where can I get perl-mode for emacs? + +Since Emacs version 19 patchlevel 22 or so, there have been both a +perl-mode.el and support for the Perl debugger built in. These should +come with the standard Emacs 19 distribution. + +In the Perl source directory, you'll find a directory called "emacs", +which contains a cperl-mode that color-codes keywords, provides +context-sensitive help, and other nifty things. + +Note that the perl-mode of emacs will have fits with C<"main'foo"> +(single quote), and mess up the indentation and highlighting. You +are probably using C<"main::foo"> in new Perl code anyway, so this +shouldn't be an issue. + +=head2 How can I use curses with Perl? + +The Curses module from CPAN provides a dynamically loadable object +module interface to a curses library. A small demo can be found at the +directory http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Tom_Christiansen/scripts/rep; +this program repeats a command and updates the screen as needed, rendering +B<rep ps axu> similar to B<top>. + +=head2 How can I use X or Tk with Perl? + +Tk is a completely Perl-based, object-oriented interface to the Tk toolkit +that doesn't force you to use Tcl just to get at Tk. Sx is an interface +to the Athena Widget set. Both are available from CPAN. See the +directory http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/by-category/08_User_Interfaces/ + +Invaluable for Perl/Tk programming are the Perl/Tk FAQ at +http://w4.lns.cornell.edu/%7Epvhp/ptk/ptkTOC.html , the Perl/Tk Reference +Guide available at +http://www.perl.com/CPAN-local/authors/Stephen_O_Lidie/ , and the +online manpages at +http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/%7Eamundson/perl/perltk/toc.html . + +=head2 How can I generate simple menus without using CGI or Tk? + +The http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/id/SKUNZ/perlmenu.v4.0.tar.gz +module, which is curses-based, can help with this. + +=head2 What is undump? + +See the next question on ``How can I make my Perl program run faster?'' + +=head2 How can I make my Perl program run faster? + +The best way to do this is to come up with a better algorithm. This +can often make a dramatic difference. Jon Bentley's book +``Programming Pearls'' (that's not a misspelling!) has some good tips +on optimization, too. Advice on benchmarking boils down to: benchmark +and profile to make sure you're optimizing the right part, look for +better algorithms instead of microtuning your code, and when all else +fails consider just buying faster hardware. + +A different approach is to autoload seldom-used Perl code. See the +AutoSplit and AutoLoader modules in the standard distribution for +that. Or you could locate the bottleneck and think about writing just +that part in C, the way we used to take bottlenecks in C code and +write them in assembler. Similar to rewriting in C, +modules that have critical sections can be written in C (for instance, the +PDL module from CPAN). + +In some cases, it may be worth it to use the backend compiler to +produce byte code (saving compilation time) or compile into C, which +will certainly save compilation time and sometimes a small amount (but +not much) execution time. See the question about compiling your Perl +programs for more on the compiler--the wins aren't as obvious as you'd +hope. + +If you're currently linking your perl executable to a shared I<libc.so>, +you can often gain a 10-25% performance benefit by rebuilding it to +link with a static libc.a instead. This will make a bigger perl +executable, but your Perl programs (and programmers) may thank you for +it. See the F<INSTALL> file in the source distribution for more +information. + +Unsubstantiated reports allege that Perl interpreters that use sfio +outperform those that don't (for I/O intensive applications). To try +this, see the F<INSTALL> file in the source distribution, especially +the ``Selecting File I/O mechanisms'' section. + +The undump program was an old attempt to speed up your Perl program +by storing the already-compiled form to disk. This is no longer +a viable option, as it only worked on a few architectures, and +wasn't a good solution anyway. + +=head2 How can I make my Perl program take less memory? + +When it comes to time-space tradeoffs, Perl nearly always prefers to +throw memory at a problem. Scalars in Perl use more memory than +strings in C, arrays take more than that, and hashes use even more. While +there's still a lot to be done, recent releases have been addressing +these issues. For example, as of 5.004, duplicate hash keys are +shared amongst all hashes using them, so require no reallocation. + +In some cases, using substr() or vec() to simulate arrays can be +highly beneficial. For example, an array of a thousand booleans will +take at least 20,000 bytes of space, but it can be turned into one +125-byte bit vector--a considerable memory savings. The standard +Tie::SubstrHash module can also help for certain types of data +structure. If you're working with specialist data structures +(matrices, for instance) modules that implement these in C may use +less memory than equivalent Perl modules. + +Another thing to try is learning whether your Perl was compiled with +the system malloc or with Perl's builtin malloc. Whichever one it +is, try using the other one and see whether this makes a difference. +Information about malloc is in the F<INSTALL> file in the source +distribution. You can find out whether you are using perl's malloc by +typing C<perl -V:usemymalloc>. + +=head2 Is it unsafe to return a pointer to local data? + +No, Perl's garbage collection system takes care of this. + + sub makeone { + my @a = ( 1 .. 10 ); + return \@a; + } + + for $i ( 1 .. 10 ) { + push @many, makeone(); + } + + print $many[4][5], "\n"; + + print "@many\n"; + +=head2 How can I free an array or hash so my program shrinks? + +You can't. On most operating systems, memory allocated to a program +can never be returned to the system. That's why long-running programs +sometimes re-exec themselves. Some operating systems (notably, +FreeBSD and Linux) allegedly reclaim large chunks of memory that is no +longer used, but it doesn't appear to happen with Perl (yet). The Mac +appears to be the only platform that will reliably (albeit, slowly) +return memory to the OS. + +We've had reports that on Linux (Redhat 5.1) on Intel, C<undef +$scalar> will return memory to the system, while on Solaris 2.6 it +won't. In general, try it yourself and see. + +However, judicious use of my() on your variables will help make sure +that they go out of scope so that Perl can free up that space for +use in other parts of your program. A global variable, of course, never +goes out of scope, so you can't get its space automatically reclaimed, +although undef()ing and/or delete()ing it will achieve the same effect. +In general, memory allocation and de-allocation isn't something you can +or should be worrying about much in Perl, but even this capability +(preallocation of data types) is in the works. + +=head2 How can I make my CGI script more efficient? + +Beyond the normal measures described to make general Perl programs +faster or smaller, a CGI program has additional issues. It may be run +several times per second. Given that each time it runs it will need +to be re-compiled and will often allocate a megabyte or more of system +memory, this can be a killer. Compiling into C B<isn't going to help +you> because the process start-up overhead is where the bottleneck is. + +There are two popular ways to avoid this overhead. One solution +involves running the Apache HTTP server (available from +http://www.apache.org/) with either of the mod_perl or mod_fastcgi +plugin modules. + +With mod_perl and the Apache::Registry module (distributed with +mod_perl), httpd will run with an embedded Perl interpreter which +pre-compiles your script and then executes it within the same address +space without forking. The Apache extension also gives Perl access to +the internal server API, so modules written in Perl can do just about +anything a module written in C can. For more on mod_perl, see +http://perl.apache.org/ + +With the FCGI module (from CPAN) and the mod_fastcgi +module (available from http://www.fastcgi.com/) each of your Perl +programs becomes a permanent CGI daemon process. + +Both of these solutions can have far-reaching effects on your system +and on the way you write your CGI programs, so investigate them with +care. + +See http://www.perl.com/CPAN/modules/by-category/15_World_Wide_Web_HTML_HTTP_CGI/ . + +A non-free, commercial product, ``The Velocity Engine for Perl'', +(http://www.binevolve.com/ or http://www.binevolve.com/velocigen/ ) +might also be worth looking at. It will allow you to increase the +performance of your Perl programs, running programs up to 25 times +faster than normal CGI Perl when running in persistent Perl mode or 4 +to 5 times faster without any modification to your existing CGI +programs. Fully functional evaluation copies are available from the +web site. + +=head2 How can I hide the source for my Perl program? + +Delete it. :-) Seriously, there are a number of (mostly +unsatisfactory) solutions with varying levels of ``security''. + +First of all, however, you I<can't> take away read permission, because +the source code has to be readable in order to be compiled and +interpreted. (That doesn't mean that a CGI script's source is +readable by people on the web, though--only by people with access to +the filesystem.) So you have to leave the permissions at the socially +friendly 0755 level. + +Some people regard this as a security problem. If your program does +insecure things and relies on people not knowing how to exploit those +insecurities, it is not secure. It is often possible for someone to +determine the insecure things and exploit them without viewing the +source. Security through obscurity, the name for hiding your bugs +instead of fixing them, is little security indeed. + +You can try using encryption via source filters (Filter::* from CPAN), +but any decent programmer will be able to decrypt it. You can try using +the byte code compiler and interpreter described below, but the curious +might still be able to de-compile it. You can try using the native-code +compiler described below, but crackers might be able to disassemble it. +These pose varying degrees of difficulty to people wanting to get at +your code, but none can definitively conceal it (true of every +language, not just Perl). + +If you're concerned about people profiting from your code, then the +bottom line is that nothing but a restrictive license will give you +legal security. License your software and pepper it with threatening +statements like ``This is unpublished proprietary software of XYZ Corp. +Your access to it does not give you permission to use it blah blah +blah.'' We are not lawyers, of course, so you should see a lawyer if +you want to be sure your license's wording will stand up in court. + +=head2 How can I compile my Perl program into byte code or C? + +Malcolm Beattie has written a multifunction backend compiler, +available from CPAN, that can do both these things. It is included +in the perl5.005 release, but is still considered experimental. +This means it's fun to play with if you're a programmer but not +really for people looking for turn-key solutions. + +Merely compiling into C does not in and of itself guarantee that your +code will run very much faster. That's because except for lucky cases +where a lot of native type inferencing is possible, the normal Perl +run-time system is still present and so your program will take just as +long to run and be just as big. Most programs save little more than +compilation time, leaving execution no more than 10-30% faster. A few +rare programs actually benefit significantly (even running several times +faster), but this takes some tweaking of your code. + +You'll probably be astonished to learn that the current version of the +compiler generates a compiled form of your script whose executable is +just as big as the original perl executable, and then some. That's +because as currently written, all programs are prepared for a full +eval() statement. You can tremendously reduce this cost by building a +shared I<libperl.so> library and linking against that. See the +F<INSTALL> podfile in the Perl source distribution for details. If +you link your main perl binary with this, it will make it minuscule. +For example, on one author's system, F</usr/bin/perl> is only 11k in +size! + +In general, the compiler will do nothing to make a Perl program smaller, +faster, more portable, or more secure. In fact, it can make your +situation worse. The executable will be bigger, your VM system may take +longer to load the whole thing, the binary is fragile and hard to fix, +and compilation never stopped software piracy in the form of crackers, +viruses, or bootleggers. The real advantage of the compiler is merely +packaging, and once you see the size of what it makes (well, unless +you use a shared I<libperl.so>), you'll probably want a complete +Perl install anyway. + +=head2 How can I compile Perl into Java? + +You can also integrate Java and Perl with the +Perl Resource Kit from O'Reilly and Associates. See +http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/prkunix/ . + +Perl 5.6 comes with Java Perl Lingo, or JPL. JPL, still in +development, allows Perl code to be called from Java. See jpl/README +in the Perl source tree. + +=head2 How can I get C<#!perl> to work on [MS-DOS,NT,...]? + +For OS/2 just use + + extproc perl -S -your_switches + +as the first line in C<*.cmd> file (C<-S> due to a bug in cmd.exe's +`extproc' handling). For DOS one should first invent a corresponding +batch file and codify it in C<ALTERNATIVE_SHEBANG> (see the +F<INSTALL> file in the source distribution for more information). + +The Win95/NT installation, when using the ActiveState port of Perl, +will modify the Registry to associate the C<.pl> extension with the +perl interpreter. If you install another port, perhaps even building +your own Win95/NT Perl from the standard sources by using a Windows port +of gcc (e.g., with cygwin or mingw32), then you'll have to modify +the Registry yourself. In addition to associating C<.pl> with the +interpreter, NT people can use: C<SET PATHEXT=%PATHEXT%;.PL> to let them +run the program C<install-linux.pl> merely by typing C<install-linux>. + +Macintosh Perl programs will have the appropriate Creator and +Type, so that double-clicking them will invoke the Perl application. + +I<IMPORTANT!>: Whatever you do, PLEASE don't get frustrated, and just +throw the perl interpreter into your cgi-bin directory, in order to +get your programs working for a web server. This is an EXTREMELY big +security risk. Take the time to figure out how to do it correctly. + +=head2 Can I write useful Perl programs on the command line? + +Yes. Read L<perlrun> for more information. Some examples follow. +(These assume standard Unix shell quoting rules.) + + # sum first and last fields + perl -lane 'print $F[0] + $F[-1]' * + + # identify text files + perl -le 'for(@ARGV) {print if -f && -T _}' * + + # remove (most) comments from C program + perl -0777 -pe 's{/\*.*?\*/}{}gs' foo.c + + # make file a month younger than today, defeating reaper daemons + perl -e '$X=24*60*60; utime(time(),time() + 30 * $X,@ARGV)' * + + # find first unused uid + perl -le '$i++ while getpwuid($i); print $i' + + # display reasonable manpath + echo $PATH | perl -nl -072 -e ' + s![^/+]*$!man!&&-d&&!$s{$_}++&&push@m,$_;END{print"@m"}' + +OK, the last one was actually an Obfuscated Perl Contest entry. :-) + +=head2 Why don't Perl one-liners work on my DOS/Mac/VMS system? + +The problem is usually that the command interpreters on those systems +have rather different ideas about quoting than the Unix shells under +which the one-liners were created. On some systems, you may have to +change single-quotes to double ones, which you must I<NOT> do on Unix +or Plan9 systems. You might also have to change a single % to a %%. + +For example: + + # Unix + perl -e 'print "Hello world\n"' + + # DOS, etc. + perl -e "print \"Hello world\n\"" + + # Mac + print "Hello world\n" + (then Run "Myscript" or Shift-Command-R) + + # VMS + perl -e "print ""Hello world\n""" + +The problem is that none of these examples are reliable: they depend on the +command interpreter. Under Unix, the first two often work. Under DOS, +it's entirely possible that neither works. If 4DOS was the command shell, +you'd probably have better luck like this: + + perl -e "print <Ctrl-x>"Hello world\n<Ctrl-x>"" + +Under the Mac, it depends which environment you are using. The MacPerl +shell, or MPW, is much like Unix shells in its support for several +quoting variants, except that it makes free use of the Mac's non-ASCII +characters as control characters. + +Using qq(), q(), and qx(), instead of "double quotes", 'single +quotes', and `backticks`, may make one-liners easier to write. + +There is no general solution to all of this. It is a mess, pure and +simple. Sucks to be away from Unix, huh? :-) + +[Some of this answer was contributed by Kenneth Albanowski.] + +=head2 Where can I learn about CGI or Web programming in Perl? + +For modules, get the CGI or LWP modules from CPAN. For textbooks, +see the two especially dedicated to web stuff in the question on +books. For problems and questions related to the web, like ``Why +do I get 500 Errors'' or ``Why doesn't it run from the browser right +when it runs fine on the command line'', see these sources: + + WWW Security FAQ + http://www.w3.org/Security/Faq/ + + Web FAQ + http://www.boutell.com/faq/ + + CGI FAQ + http://www.webthing.com/tutorials/cgifaq.html + + HTTP Spec + http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/Protocols/HTTP/ + + HTML Spec + http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/ + http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/ + + CGI Spec + http://www.w3.org/CGI/ + + CGI Security FAQ + http://www.go2net.com/people/paulp/cgi-security/safe-cgi.txt + +=head2 Where can I learn about object-oriented Perl programming? + +A good place to start is L<perltoot>, and you can use L<perlobj>, +L<perlboot>, and L<perlbot> for reference. Perltoot didn't come out +until the 5.004 release; you can get a copy (in pod, html, or +postscript) from http://www.perl.com/CPAN/doc/FMTEYEWTK/ . + +=head2 Where can I learn about linking C with Perl? [h2xs, xsubpp] + +If you want to call C from Perl, start with L<perlxstut>, +moving on to L<perlxs>, L<xsubpp>, and L<perlguts>. If you want to +call Perl from C, then read L<perlembed>, L<perlcall>, and +L<perlguts>. Don't forget that you can learn a lot from looking at +how the authors of existing extension modules wrote their code and +solved their problems. + +=head2 I've read perlembed, perlguts, etc., but I can't embed perl in +my C program; what am I doing wrong? + +Download the ExtUtils::Embed kit from CPAN and run `make test'. If +the tests pass, read the pods again and again and again. If they +fail, see L<perlbug> and send a bug report with the output of +C<make test TEST_VERBOSE=1> along with C<perl -V>. + +=head2 When I tried to run my script, I got this message. What does it +mean? + +A complete list of Perl's error messages and warnings with explanatory +text can be found in L<perldiag>. You can also use the splain program +(distributed with Perl) to explain the error messages: + + perl program 2>diag.out + splain [-v] [-p] diag.out + +or change your program to explain the messages for you: + + use diagnostics; + +or + + use diagnostics -verbose; + +=head2 What's MakeMaker? + +This module (part of the standard Perl distribution) is designed to +write a Makefile for an extension module from a Makefile.PL. For more +information, see L<ExtUtils::MakeMaker>. + +=head1 AUTHOR AND COPYRIGHT + +Copyright (c) 1997-1999 Tom Christiansen and Nathan Torkington. +All rights reserved. + +When included as an integrated part of the Standard Distribution +of Perl or of its documentation (printed or otherwise), this works is +covered under Perl's Artistic License. For separate distributions of +all or part of this FAQ outside of that, see L<perlfaq>. + +Irrespective of its distribution, all code examples here are in the public +domain. You are permitted and encouraged to use this code and any +derivatives thereof in your own programs for fun or for profit as you +see fit. A simple comment in the code giving credit to the FAQ would +be courteous but is not required. |