summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libpurple/purplegdkpixbuf.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fix leaked errorsElliott Sales de Andrade2023-03-231-12/+6
| | | | | | | | | And also simplify some cases with `g_clear_error`. Testing Done: Compiled and ran tests in valgrind, though it never noticed these anyway. Reviewed at https://reviews.imfreedom.org/r/2384/
* Add gdk-pixbuf as a libpurple dependency and move helpers from pidgin to purpleGary Kramlich2022-04-011-0/+235
Adding gdk-pixbuf as a dependency to libpurple is kind of questionable, but it's dependencies are really just libpng, libjpeg, and libtiff. In other words, nothing UI specific. Which means we can remove a bunch of API with this change which is awesome. This is the first step in replacing `PurpleImage` with `GdkPixbuf`. Which will also eventually include `PurpleBuddyIcon` and remove the need for `PurpleBuddyIconSpec` as protocol plugins will just be able to scale and format images themselves. * Move `pidgingdkpixbuf.[ch]` to `purplegdkpixbuf.[ch]` * Renamed all function from `purplegdkpixbuf.[ch]` to be in the purple_gdk_pixbuf namespace * Removed all unused function from `purplegdkpixbuf.[ch]` I also did some research on how much disk space adding gdkpixbuf would add. The base is a base debian container and this is against libpurple2 which is obviously going to be different. But the question was how much additional disk space will be used by adding gdkpixbuf. ``` base: 157680 bitlbee: 216452 bitlbee+gdkpixbuf: 222388 bitlbee-purple *: 363860 bitlbee-purple+gdkpixbuf *: 369796 * --no-install-recommends ``` We can see that for gdkpixbuf will about about 6MB of of disk usage which I would hope would be acceptable when libpurple adds 141MB by itself. Testing Done: Ran and verified that an animated buddy icon was still displayed properly in the infopane and the buddy list. Reviewed at https://reviews.imfreedom.org/r/1224/