diff options
| author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2019-08-12 11:58:35 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2019-08-12 11:58:35 -0400 |
| commit | 3c926587b5928795e54dfea65c712a604f63cdeb (patch) | |
| tree | 6c2f15f54c12d3e5dafcd6874f6897ed2dda80d5 /src/include/nodes/execnodes.h | |
| parent | 5ee190f8ec37c1bbfb3061e18304e155d600bc8e (diff) | |
| download | postgresql-3c926587b5928795e54dfea65c712a604f63cdeb.tar.gz | |
Remove EState.es_range_table_array.
Now that list_nth is O(1), there's no good reason to maintain a
separate array of RTE pointers rather than indexing into
estate->es_range_table. Deleting the array doesn't save all that
much either; but just on cleanliness grounds, it's better not to
have duplicate representations of the identical information.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14960.1565384592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Diffstat (limited to 'src/include/nodes/execnodes.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/include/nodes/execnodes.h | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/include/nodes/execnodes.h b/src/include/nodes/execnodes.h index 4ec78491f6..063b49013c 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/execnodes.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/execnodes.h @@ -502,7 +502,6 @@ typedef struct EState Snapshot es_snapshot; /* time qual to use */ Snapshot es_crosscheck_snapshot; /* crosscheck time qual for RI */ List *es_range_table; /* List of RangeTblEntry */ - struct RangeTblEntry **es_range_table_array; /* equivalent array */ Index es_range_table_size; /* size of the range table arrays */ Relation *es_relations; /* Array of per-range-table-entry Relation * pointers, or NULL if not yet opened */ |