summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/commands/analyze.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/commands/analyze.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/commands/analyze.c46
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/analyze.c b/src/backend/commands/analyze.c
index a04adeaac7..c09ca7e6db 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/analyze.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/analyze.c
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ do_analyze_rel(Relation onerel, VacuumStmt *vacstmt,
/*
* Open all indexes of the relation, and see if there are any analyzable
- * columns in the indexes. We do not analyze index columns if there was
+ * columns in the indexes. We do not analyze index columns if there was
* an explicit column list in the ANALYZE command, however. If we are
* doing a recursive scan, we don't want to touch the parent's indexes at
* all.
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ do_analyze_rel(Relation onerel, VacuumStmt *vacstmt,
/*
* Determine how many rows we need to sample, using the worst case from
- * all analyzable columns. We use a lower bound of 100 rows to avoid
+ * all analyzable columns. We use a lower bound of 100 rows to avoid
* possible overflow in Vitter's algorithm. (Note: that will also be the
* target in the corner case where there are no analyzable columns.)
*/
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ do_analyze_rel(Relation onerel, VacuumStmt *vacstmt,
&totalrows, &totaldeadrows);
/*
- * Compute the statistics. Temporary results during the calculations for
+ * Compute the statistics. Temporary results during the calculations for
* each column are stored in a child context. The calc routines are
* responsible to make sure that whatever they store into the VacAttrStats
* structure is allocated in anl_context.
@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ do_analyze_rel(Relation onerel, VacuumStmt *vacstmt,
/*
* Emit the completed stats rows into pg_statistic, replacing any
- * previous statistics for the target columns. (If there are stats in
+ * previous statistics for the target columns. (If there are stats in
* pg_statistic for columns we didn't process, we leave them alone.)
*/
update_attstats(RelationGetRelid(onerel), inh,
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ do_analyze_rel(Relation onerel, VacuumStmt *vacstmt,
}
/*
- * Report ANALYZE to the stats collector, too. However, if doing
+ * Report ANALYZE to the stats collector, too. However, if doing
* inherited stats we shouldn't report, because the stats collector only
* tracks per-table stats.
*/
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ examine_attribute(Relation onerel, int attnum, Node *index_expr)
return NULL;
/*
- * Create the VacAttrStats struct. Note that we only have a copy of the
+ * Create the VacAttrStats struct. Note that we only have a copy of the
* fixed fields of the pg_attribute tuple.
*/
stats = (VacAttrStats *) palloc0(sizeof(VacAttrStats));
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ examine_attribute(Relation onerel, int attnum, Node *index_expr)
/*
* When analyzing an expression index, believe the expression tree's type
* not the column datatype --- the latter might be the opckeytype storage
- * type of the opclass, which is not interesting for our purposes. (Note:
+ * type of the opclass, which is not interesting for our purposes. (Note:
* if we did anything with non-expression index columns, we'd need to
* figure out where to get the correct type info from, but for now that's
* not a problem.) It's not clear whether anyone will care about the
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ examine_attribute(Relation onerel, int attnum, Node *index_expr)
}
/*
- * Call the type-specific typanalyze function. If none is specified, use
+ * Call the type-specific typanalyze function. If none is specified, use
* std_typanalyze().
*/
if (OidIsValid(stats->attrtype->typanalyze))
@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ BlockSampler_Next(BlockSampler bs)
* If we are to skip, we should advance t (hence decrease K), and
* repeat the same probabilistic test for the next block. The naive
* implementation thus requires an anl_random_fract() call for each block
- * number. But we can reduce this to one anl_random_fract() call per
+ * number. But we can reduce this to one anl_random_fract() call per
* selected block, by noting that each time the while-test succeeds,
* we can reinterpret V as a uniform random number in the range 0 to p.
* Therefore, instead of choosing a new V, we just adjust p to be
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ acquire_sample_rows(Relation onerel, int elevel,
/*
* We ignore unused and redirect line pointers. DEAD line
* pointers should be counted as dead, because we need vacuum to
- * run to get rid of them. Note that this rule agrees with the
+ * run to get rid of them. Note that this rule agrees with the
* way that heap_page_prune() counts things.
*/
if (!ItemIdIsNormal(itemid))
@@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ acquire_sample_rows(Relation onerel, int elevel,
* is the safer option.
*
* A special case is that the inserting transaction might
- * be our own. In this case we should count and sample
+ * be our own. In this case we should count and sample
* the row, to accommodate users who load a table and
* analyze it in one transaction. (pgstat_report_analyze
* has to adjust the numbers we send to the stats
@@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ acquire_sample_rows(Relation onerel, int elevel,
/*
* The first targrows sample rows are simply copied into the
* reservoir. Then we start replacing tuples in the sample
- * until we reach the end of the relation. This algorithm is
+ * until we reach the end of the relation. This algorithm is
* from Jeff Vitter's paper (see full citation below). It
* works by repeatedly computing the number of tuples to skip
* before selecting a tuple, which replaces a randomly chosen
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ acquire_sample_rows(Relation onerel, int elevel,
qsort((void *) rows, numrows, sizeof(HeapTuple), compare_rows);
/*
- * Estimate total numbers of rows in relation. For live rows, use
+ * Estimate total numbers of rows in relation. For live rows, use
* vac_estimate_reltuples; for dead rows, we have no source of old
* information, so we have to assume the density is the same in unseen
* pages as in the pages we scanned.
@@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ acquire_inherited_sample_rows(Relation onerel, int elevel,
* Statistics are stored in several places: the pg_class row for the
* relation has stats about the whole relation, and there is a
* pg_statistic row for each (non-system) attribute that has ever
- * been analyzed. The pg_class values are updated by VACUUM, not here.
+ * been analyzed. The pg_class values are updated by VACUUM, not here.
*
* pg_statistic rows are just added or updated normally. This means
* that pg_statistic will probably contain some deleted rows at the
@@ -2001,7 +2001,7 @@ compute_minimal_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
/*
* If the value is toasted, we want to detoast it just once to
* avoid repeated detoastings and resultant excess memory usage
- * during the comparisons. Also, check to see if the value is
+ * during the comparisons. Also, check to see if the value is
* excessively wide, and if so don't detoast at all --- just
* ignore the value.
*/
@@ -2121,7 +2121,7 @@ compute_minimal_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
* We assume (not very reliably!) that all the multiply-occurring
* values are reflected in the final track[] list, and the other
* nonnull values all appeared but once. (XXX this usually
- * results in a drastic overestimate of ndistinct. Can we do
+ * results in a drastic overestimate of ndistinct. Can we do
* any better?)
*----------
*/
@@ -2158,7 +2158,7 @@ compute_minimal_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
* Decide how many values are worth storing as most-common values. If
* we are able to generate a complete MCV list (all the values in the
* sample will fit, and we think these are all the ones in the table),
- * then do so. Otherwise, store only those values that are
+ * then do so. Otherwise, store only those values that are
* significantly more common than the (estimated) average. We set the
* threshold rather arbitrarily at 25% more than average, with at
* least 2 instances in the sample.
@@ -2326,7 +2326,7 @@ compute_scalar_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
/*
* If the value is toasted, we want to detoast it just once to
* avoid repeated detoastings and resultant excess memory usage
- * during the comparisons. Also, check to see if the value is
+ * during the comparisons. Also, check to see if the value is
* excessively wide, and if so don't detoast at all --- just
* ignore the value.
*/
@@ -2371,7 +2371,7 @@ compute_scalar_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
* accumulate ordering-correlation statistics.
*
* To determine which are most common, we first have to count the
- * number of duplicates of each value. The duplicates are adjacent in
+ * number of duplicates of each value. The duplicates are adjacent in
* the sorted list, so a brute-force approach is to compare successive
* datum values until we find two that are not equal. However, that
* requires N-1 invocations of the datum comparison routine, which are
@@ -2380,7 +2380,7 @@ compute_scalar_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
* that are adjacent in the sorted order; otherwise it could not know
* that it's ordered the pair correctly.) We exploit this by having
* compare_scalars remember the highest tupno index that each
- * ScalarItem has been found equal to. At the end of the sort, a
+ * ScalarItem has been found equal to. At the end of the sort, a
* ScalarItem's tupnoLink will still point to itself if and only if it
* is the last item of its group of duplicates (since the group will
* be ordered by tupno).
@@ -2500,7 +2500,7 @@ compute_scalar_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
* Decide how many values are worth storing as most-common values. If
* we are able to generate a complete MCV list (all the values in the
* sample will fit, and we think these are all the ones in the table),
- * then do so. Otherwise, store only those values that are
+ * then do so. Otherwise, store only those values that are
* significantly more common than the (estimated) average. We set the
* threshold rather arbitrarily at 25% more than average, with at
* least 2 instances in the sample. Also, we won't suppress values
@@ -2655,7 +2655,7 @@ compute_scalar_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
/*
* The object of this loop is to copy the first and last values[]
- * entries along with evenly-spaced values in between. So the
+ * entries along with evenly-spaced values in between. So the
* i'th value is values[(i * (nvals - 1)) / (num_hist - 1)]. But
* computing that subscript directly risks integer overflow when
* the stats target is more than a couple thousand. Instead we
@@ -2766,7 +2766,7 @@ compute_scalar_stats(VacAttrStatsP stats,
* qsort_arg comparator for sorting ScalarItems
*
* Aside from sorting the items, we update the tupnoLink[] array
- * whenever two ScalarItems are found to contain equal datums. The array
+ * whenever two ScalarItems are found to contain equal datums. The array
* is indexed by tupno; for each ScalarItem, it contains the highest
* tupno that that item's datum has been found to be equal to. This allows
* us to avoid additional comparisons in compute_scalar_stats().