summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Add back SQLValueFunction for SQL keywordsMichael Paquier2023-05-171-37/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is equivalent to a revert of f193883 and fb32748, with the addition that the declaration of the SQLValueFunction node needs to gain a couple of node_attr for query jumbling. The performance impact of removing the function call inlining is proving to be too huge for some workloads where these are used. A worst-case test case of involving only simple SELECT queries with a SQL keyword is proving to lead to a reduction of 10% in TPS via pgbench and prepared queries on a high-end machine. None of the tests I ran back for this set of changes saw such a huge gap, but Alexander Lakhin and Andres Freund have found that this can be noticeable. Keeping the older performance would mean to do more inlining in the executor when using COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX for a function expression, similarly to what SQLValueFunction does. This requires more redesign work and there is little time until 16beta1 is released, so for now reverting the change is the best way forward, bringing back the previous performance. Bump catalog version. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b32bed1b-0746-9b20-1472-4bdc9ca66d52@gmail.com
* Add functions to do timestamptz arithmetic in a non-default timezone.Tom Lane2023-03-181-35/+111
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add versions of timestamptz + interval, timestamptz - interval, and generate_series(timestamptz, ...) in which a timezone can be specified explicitly instead of defaulting to the TimeZone GUC setting. The new functions for the first two are named date_add and date_subtract. This might seem too generic, but we could use overloading to add additional variants if that seems useful. Along the way, improve the docs' pretty inadequate explanation of how timestamptz +- interval works. Przemysław Sztoch and Gurjeet Singh; cosmetic changes and most of the docs work by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01a84551-48dd-1359-bf7e-f6b0203a6bd0@sztoch.pl
* Refactor datetime functions' timezone lookup code to reduce duplication.Tom Lane2023-03-171-141/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | We already had five copies of essentially the same logic, and an upcoming patch introduces yet another use-case. That's past my threshold of pain, so introduce a common subroutine. There's not that much net code savings, but the chance of typos should go down. Inspired by a patch from Przemysław Sztoch, but different in detail. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01a84551-48dd-1359-bf7e-f6b0203a6bd0@sztoch.pl
* Detect overflow in timestamp[tz] subtraction.Tom Lane2023-02-201-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | It's possible to overflow the int64 microseconds field of the output interval when subtracting two timestamps. Detect that instead of silently returning a bogus result. Nick Babadzhanian Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABw73Uq2oJ3E+kYvvDuY04EkhhkChim2e-PaghBDjOmgUAMWGw@mail.gmail.com
* Improve TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds to cope with overflow sanely.Tom Lane2023-01-261-8/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We'd like to use TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds with the stop_time possibly being TIMESTAMP_INFINITY, but up to now it's disclaimed responsibility for overflow cases. Define it to clamp its output to the range [0, INT_MAX], handling overflow correctly. (INT_MAX rather than LONG_MAX seems appropriate, because the function is already described as being intended for calculating wait times for WaitLatch et al, and that infrastructure only handles waits up to INT_MAX. Also, this choice gets rid of cross-platform behavioral differences.) Having done that, we can replace some ad-hoc code in walreceiver.c with a simple call to TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds. While at it, fix some buglets in existing callers of TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds: basebackup_copy.c had not read the memo about TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds never returning a negative value, and postmaster.c had not read the memo about Min() and Max() being macros with multiple-evaluation hazards. Neither of these quite seem worth back-patching. Patch by me; thanks to Nathan Bossart for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3126727.1674759248@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian2023-01-021-1/+1
| | | | Backpatch-through: 11
* Fix precision handling for some COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX functionsMichael Paquier2022-12-301-8/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | f193883 has been incorrectly setting up the precision used in the timestamp compilations returned by the following functions: - LOCALTIME - LOCALTIMESTAMP - CURRENT_TIME - CURRENT_TIMESTAMP Specifying an out-of-range precision for CURRENT_TIMESTAMP and LOCALTIMESTAMP was raising a WARNING without adjusting the precision, leading to a subsequent error. LOCALTIME and CURRENT_TIME raised a WARNING without an error, still the precision given to the internal routines was not correct, so let's be clean. Ian has reported the problems in timestamp.c, while I have noticed the ones in date.c. Regression tests are added for all of them with precisions high enough to provide coverage for the warnings, something that went missing up to this commit. Author: Ian Lawrence Barwick, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB8KJ=jQEnn9sYG+N752spt68wMrhmT-ocHCh4oeNmHF82QMWA@mail.gmail.com
* Convert datetime input functions to use "soft" error reporting.Tom Lane2022-12-091-45/+49
| | | | | | | | | This patch converts the input functions for date, time, timetz, timestamp, timestamptz, and interval to the new soft-error style. There's some related stuff in formatting.c that remains to be cleaned up, but that seems like a separable project. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3bbbb0df-7382-bf87-9737-340ba096e034@postgrespro.ru
* Allow DateTimeParseError to handle bad-timezone error messages.Tom Lane2022-12-091-17/+37
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Pay down some ancient technical debt (dating to commit 022fd9966): fix a couple of places in datetime parsing that were throwing ereport's immediately instead of returning a DTERR code that could be interpreted by DateTimeParseError. The reason for that was that there was no mechanism for passing any auxiliary data (such as a zone name) to DateTimeParseError, and these errors seemed to really need it. Up to now it didn't matter that much just where the error got thrown, but now we'd like to have a hard policy that datetime parse errors get thrown from just the one place. Hence, invent a "DateTimeErrorExtra" struct that can be used to carry any extra values needed for specific DTERR codes. Perhaps in the future somebody will be motivated to use this to improve the specificity of other DateTimeParseError messages, but for now just deal with the timezone-error cases. This is on the way to making the datetime input functions report parse errors softly; but it's really an independent change, so commit separately. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3bbbb0df-7382-bf87-9737-340ba096e034@postgrespro.ru
* Replace SQLValueFunction by COERCE_SQL_SYNTAXMichael Paquier2022-11-211-29/+43
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This switch impacts 9 patterns related to a SQL-mandated special syntax for function calls: - LOCALTIME [ ( typmod ) ] - LOCALTIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ] - CURRENT_TIME [ ( typmod ) ] - CURRENT_TIMESTAMP [ ( typmod ) ] - CURRENT_DATE Five new entries are added to pg_proc to compensate the removal of SQLValueFunction to provide backward-compatibility and making this change transparent for the end-user (for example for the attribute generated when a keyword is specified in a SELECT or in a FROM clause without an alias, or when specifying something else than an Iconst to the parser). The parser included a set of checks coming from the files in charge of holding the C functions used for the SQLValueFunction calls (as of transformSQLValueFunction()), which are now moved within each function's execution path, so this reduces the dependencies between the execution and the parsing steps. As of this change, all the SQL keywords use the same paths for their work, relying only on COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX. Like fb32748, no performance difference has been noticed, while the perf profiles get reduced with ExecEvalSQLValueFunction() gone. Bump catalog version. Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker, Ted Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YzaG3MoryCguUOym@paquier.xyz
* Remove unnecessary uses of Abs()Peter Eisentraut2022-10-071-2/+2
| | | | | | | | Use C standard abs() or fabs() instead. Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli <zmlpostgres@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4beb42b5-216b-bce8-d452-d924d5794c63%40enterprisedb.com
* Harmonize more parameter names in bulk.Peter Geoghegan2022-09-201-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the corresponding names from function definitions in optimizer, parser, utility, libpq, and "commands" code, as well as in remaining library code. Do the same for all code related to frontend programs (with the exception of pg_dump/pg_dumpall related code). Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will handle ecpg and pg_dump/pg_dumpall. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
* Fix an assortment of improper usages of string functionsDavid Rowley2022-09-061-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In a similar effort to f736e188c and 110d81728, fixup various usages of string functions where a more appropriate function is available and more fit for purpose. These changes include: 1. Use cstring_to_text_with_len() instead of cstring_to_text() when working with a StringInfoData and the length can easily be obtained. 2. Use appendStringInfoString() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting is required. 3. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf("%s", ...) 4. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf(...) (with no formatting) 5. Use appendPQExpBufferChar() instead of appendPQExpBufferStr() when the length of the string being appended is 1. 6. appendStringInfoChar() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting is required and string is 1 char long. 7. Use appendPQExpBufferStr(b, .) instead of appendPQExpBuffer(b, "%s", .) 8. Don't use pstrdup when it's fine to just point to the string constant. I (David) did find other cases of #8 but opted to use #4 instead as I wasn't certain enough that applying #8 was ok (e.g in hba.c) Author: Ranier Vilela, David Rowley Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2j2+RJBGhNtUz6BxabWWh2Jx16wMUMWKUjv70Ver1vg@mail.gmail.com
* Replace many MemSet calls with struct initializationPeter Eisentraut2022-07-161-5/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This replaces all MemSet() calls with struct initialization where that is easily and obviously possible. (For example, some cases have to worry about padding bits, so I left those.) (The same could be done with appropriate memset() calls, but this patch is part of an effort to phase out MemSet(), so it doesn't touch memset() calls.) Reviewed-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9847b13c-b785-f4e2-75c3-12ec77a3b05c@enterprisedb.com
* Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane2022-05-121-113/+114
| | | | | Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
* Fix some incorrect preprocessor tests in tuplesort specializationsDavid Rowley2022-05-111-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 697492434 added 3 new quicksort specialization functions for common datatypes. That commit was not very consistent in how it would determine if we're compiling for 32-bit or 64-bit machines. It would sometimes use USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL and at other times check if SIZEOF_DATUM == 8. This could cause theoretical problems due to the way USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL is now defined based on SIZEOF_VOID_P >= 8. If pointers for some reason were ever larger than 8-bytes then we'd end up doing 32-bit comparisons mistakenly. Let's just always check SIZEOF_DATUM >= 8. It also seems that ssup_datum_signed_cmp is just never used on 32-bit builds, so let's just ifdef that out to make sure we never accidentally use that comparison function on such machines. This also allows us to ifdef out 1 of the 3 new specialization quicksort functions in 32-bit builds which seems to shrink down the binary by over 4KB on my machine. In passing, also add the missing DatumGetInt32() / DatumGetInt64() macros in the comparison functions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqcQExRhtRa9hJrJB_5egs3SUfOcutP3m+3HO8A+fZTPA@mail.gmail.com Reviewed-by: John Naylor
* Revert "Disallow infinite endpoints in generate_series() for timestamps."Tom Lane2022-05-091-28/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This reverts commit eafdf9de06e9b60168f5e47cedcfceecdc6d4b5f and its back-branch counterparts. Corey Huinker pointed out that we'd discussed this exact change back in 2016 and rejected it, on the grounds that there's at least one usage pattern with LIMIT where an infinite endpoint can usefully be used. Perhaps that argument needs to be re-litigated, but there's no time left before our back-branch releases. To keep our options open, restore the status quo ante; if we do end up deciding to change things, waiting one more quarter won't hurt anything. Rather than just doing a straight revert, I added a new test case demonstrating the usage with LIMIT. That'll at least remind us of the issue if we forget again. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3603504.1652068977@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADkLM=dzw0Pvdqp5yWKxMd+VmNkAMhG=4ku7GnCZxebWnzmz3Q@mail.gmail.com
* Disallow infinite endpoints in generate_series() for timestamps.Tom Lane2022-04-201-0/+28
| | | | | | | | | | Such cases will lead to infinite loops, so they're of no practical value. The numeric variant of generate_series() already threw error for this, so borrow its message wording. Per report from Richard Wesley. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/91B44E7B-68D5-448F-95C8-B4B3B0F5DEAF@duckdblabs.com
* Fix extract epoch from interval calculationPeter Eisentraut2022-04-191-4/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The new numeric code for extract epoch from interval accidentally truncated the DAYS_PER_YEAR value to an integer, leading to results that mismatched the floating-point interval_part calculations. The commit a2da77cdb4661826482ebf2ddba1f953bc74afe4 that introduced this actually contains the regression test change that this reverts. I suppose this was missed at the time. Reported-by: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAvxfHd5n%3D13NYA2q_tUq%3D3%3DSuWU-CufmTf-Ozj%3DfrEgt7pXwQ%40mail.gmail.com
* Remove extraneous blank lines before block-closing bracesAlvaro Herrera2022-04-131-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | These are useless and distracting. We wouldn't have written the code with them to begin with, so there's no reason to keep them. Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220411020336.GB26620@telsasoft.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/attachment/133167/0016-Extraneous-blank-lines.patch
* Fix overflow hazards in interval input and output conversions.Tom Lane2022-04-021-86/+91
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DecodeInterval (interval input) was careless about integer-overflow hazards, allowing bogus results to be obtained for sufficiently large input values. Also, since it initially converted the input to a "struct tm", it was impossible to produce the full range of representable interval values. Meanwhile, EncodeInterval (interval output) and a few other functions could suffer failures if asked to process sufficiently large interval values, because they also relied on being able to represent an interval in "struct tm" which is not designed to handle that. Fix all this stuff by introducing new struct types that are more fit for purpose. While this is clearly a bug fix, it's also an API break for any code that's calling these functions directly. So back-patching doesn't seem wise, especially in view of the lack of field complaints. Joe Koshakow, editorialized a bit by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHff0JLYHwyBrtMx_=6wr=k2Xp+D+-X3vEhHjJYMj+mQcg@mail.gmail.com
* Specialize tuplesort routines for different kinds of abbreviated keysJohn Naylor2022-04-021-0/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, the specialized tuplesort routine inlined handling for reverse-sort and NULLs-ordering but called the datum comparator via a pointer in the SortSupport struct parameter. Testing has showed that we can get a useful performance gain by specializing datum comparison for the different representations of abbreviated keys -- signed and unsigned 64-bit integers and signed 32-bit integers. Almost all abbreviatable data types will benefit -- the only exception for now is numeric, since the datum comparison is more complex. The performance gain depends on data type and input distribution, but often falls in the range of 10-20% faster. Thomas Munro Reviewed by Peter Geoghegan, review and performance testing by me Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGKKYttZZk-JMRQSVak%3DCXSJ5fiwtirFf%3Dn%3DPAbumvn1Ww%40mail.gmail.com
* Handle integer overflow in interval justification functions.Tom Lane2022-02-281-4/+31
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | justify_interval, justify_hours, and justify_days didn't check for overflow when promoting hours to days or days to months; but that's possible when the upper field's value is already large. Detect and report any such overflow. Also, we can avoid unnecessary overflow in some cases in justify_interval by pre-justifying the days field. (Thanks to Nathan Bossart for this idea.) Joe Koshakow Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHeNqsJ2xYFbPUf_8nNQUiJqkag04NW6aBQQ0dbZsxfWHA@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2022Bruce Momjian2022-01-071-1/+1
| | | | Backpatch-through: 10
* Clean up error messages related to bad datetime units.Tom Lane2022-01-031-58/+41
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Adjust the error texts used for unrecognized/unsupported datetime units so that there are just two strings to translate, not two per datatype. Along the way, follow our usual error message style of not double-quoting type names, and instead making sure that we say the name is a type. Fix a couple of places in date.c that were using the wrong one of "unrecognized" and "unsupported". Nikhil Benesch, with a bit more editing by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPWqQZTURGixmbMH2_Z3ZtWGA0ANjUb9bwtkkxSxSfDeFHuM6Q@mail.gmail.com
* Avoid unnecessary division in interval_cmp_value().Tom Lane2021-09-261-8/+5
| | | | | | | | | Splitting the time field into days and microseconds is pretty useless when we're just going to recombine those values. It's unclear if anyone will notice the speedup in real-world cases, but a cycle shaved is a cycle earned. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2629129.1632675713@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Disallow negative strides in date_bin()John Naylor2021-07-281-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | It's not clear what the semantics of negative strides would be, so throw an error instead. Per report from Bauyrzhan Sakhariyev Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKpL73vZmLuFVuwF26FJ%2BNk11PVHhAnQRoREFcA03x7znRoFvA%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch to v14
* Fix division by zero error in date_binJohn Naylor2021-07-221-0/+10
| | | | | | Bauyrzhan Sakhariyev, via Github Backpatch to v14
* Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v14.Tom Lane2021-05-121-4/+4
| | | | | | | | Also "make reformat-dat-files". The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
* Silence some Coverity warnings and improve code consistency.Tom Lane2021-04-111-13/+13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Coverity complained about possible overflow in expressions like intresult = tm->tm_sec * 1000000 + fsec; on the grounds that the multiplication would happen in 32-bit arithmetic before widening to the int64 result. I think these are all false positives because of the limited possible range of tm_sec; but nonetheless it seems silly to spell it like that when nearby lines have the identical computation written with a 64-bit constant. ... or more accurately, with an LL constant, which is not project style. Make all of these use INT64CONST(), as we do elsewhere. This is all new code from a2da77cdb, so no need for back-patch.
* Improve behavior of date_bin with origin in the futurePeter Eisentraut2021-04-101-0/+14
| | | | | | | | | | Currently, when the origin is after the input, the result is the timestamp at the end of the bin, rather than the beginning as expected. This puts the result consistently at the beginning of the bin. Author: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsGjLDxQofRfH+d4KSAXxPf3MMevUG7s6EDfdBOvHLDLjw@mail.gmail.com
* Change return type of EXTRACT to numericPeter Eisentraut2021-04-061-124/+347
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The previous implementation of EXTRACT mapped internally to date_part(), which returned type double precision (since it was implemented long before the numeric type existed). This can lead to imprecise output in some cases, so returning numeric would be preferrable. Changing the return type of an existing function is a bit risky, so instead we do the following: We implement a new set of functions, which are now called "extract", in parallel to the existing date_part functions. They work the same way internally but use numeric instead of float8. The EXTRACT construct is now mapped by the parser to these new extract functions. That way, dumps of views etc. from old versions (which would use date_part) continue to work unchanged, but new uses will map to the new extract functions. Additionally, the reverse compilation of EXTRACT now reproduces the original syntax, using the new mechanism introduced in 40c24bfef92530bd846e111c1742c2a54441c62c. The following minor changes of behavior result from the new implementation: - The column name from an isolated EXTRACT call is now "extract" instead of "date_part". - Extract from date now rejects inappropriate field names such as HOUR. It was previously mapped internally to extract from timestamp, so it would silently accept everything appropriate for timestamp. - Return values when extracting fields with possibly fractional values, such as second and epoch, now have the full scale that the value has internally (so, for example, '1.000000' instead of just '1'). Reported-by: Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/42b73d2d-da12-ba9f-570a-420e0cce19d9@phystech.edu
* Fix internal extract(timezone_minute) formulasPeter Eisentraut2021-04-011-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | Through various refactorings over time, the extract(timezone_minute from time with time zone) and extract(timezone_minute from timestamp with time zone) implementations ended up with two different but equally nonsensical formulas by using SECS_PER_MINUTE and MINS_PER_HOUR interchangeably. Since those two are of course both the same number, the formulas do work, but for readability, fix them to be semantically correct.
* Fix stray double semicolonsPeter Eisentraut2021-03-241-2/+2
| | | | Reported-by: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
* Add date_bin functionPeter Eisentraut2021-03-241-0/+74
| | | | | | | | | | | | Similar to date_trunc, but allows binning by an arbitrary interval rather than just full units. Author: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: David Fetter <david@fetter.org> Reviewed-by: Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACPNZCt4buQFRgy6DyjuZS-2aPDpccRkrJBmgUfwYc1KiaXYxg@mail.gmail.com
* Update copyright for 2021Bruce Momjian2021-01-021-1/+1
| | | | Backpatch-through: 9.5
* Fix and simplify some usages of TimestampDifference().Tom Lane2020-11-101-3/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Introduce TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds() to simplify callers that would rather have the difference in milliseconds, instead of the select()-oriented seconds-and-microseconds format. This gets rid of at least one integer division per call, and it eliminates some apparently-easy-to-mess-up arithmetic. Two of these call sites were in fact wrong: * pg_prewarm's autoprewarm_main() forgot to multiply the seconds by 1000, thus ending up with a delay 1000X shorter than intended. That doesn't quite make it a busy-wait, but close. * postgres_fdw's pgfdw_get_cleanup_result() thought it needed to compute microseconds not milliseconds, thus ending up with a delay 1000X longer than intended. Somebody along the way had noticed this problem but misdiagnosed the cause, and imposed an ad-hoc 60-second limit rather than fixing the units. This was relatively harmless in context, because we don't care that much about exactly how long this delay is; still, it's wrong. There are a few more callers of TimestampDifference() that don't have a direct need for seconds-and-microseconds, but can't use TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds() either because they do need microsecond precision or because they might possibly deal with intervals long enough to overflow 32-bit milliseconds. It might be worth inventing another API to improve that, but that seems outside the scope of this patch; so those callers are untouched here. Given the fact that we are fixing some bugs, and the likelihood that future patches might want to back-patch code that uses this new API, back-patch to all supported branches. Alexey Kondratov and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b1c053a21c07c1ed5e00be3b2b855ef@postgrespro.ru
* Prevent internal overflows in date-vs-timestamp and related comparisons.Tom Lane2020-10-071-63/+52
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The date-vs-timestamp, date-vs-timestamptz, and timestamp-vs-timestamptz comparators all worked by promoting the first type to the second and then doing a simple same-type comparison. This works fine, except when the conversion result is out of range, in which case we throw an entirely avoidable error. The sources of such failures are (a) type date can represent dates much farther in the future than the timestamp types can; (b) timezone rotation might cause a just-in-range timestamp value to become a just-out-of-range timestamptz value. Up to now we just ignored these corner-case issues, but now we have an actual user complaint (bug #16657 from Huss EL-Sheikh), so let's do something about it. It turns out that commit 52ad1e659 already built all the necessary infrastructure to support error-free comparisons, but neglected to actually use it in the main-line code paths. Fix that, do a little bit of code style review, and remove the now-duplicate logic in jsonpath_exec.c. Back-patch to v13 where 52ad1e659 came in. We could take this back further by back-patching said infrastructure, but given the small number of complaints so far, I don't feel a great need to. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16657-cde2f876d8cc7971@postgresql.org
* Fix make_timestamp[tz] to accept negative years as meaning BC.Tom Lane2020-09-291-5/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | Previously we threw an error. But make_date already allowed the case, so it is inconsistent as well as unhelpful for make_timestamp not to. Both functions continue to reject year zero. Code and test fixes by Peter Eisentraut, doc changes by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13c0992c-f15a-a0ca-d839-91d3efd965d9@2ndquadrant.com
* Reject "23:59:60.nnn" in datetime input.Tom Lane2020-06-041-13/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | It's intentional that we don't allow values greater than 24 hours, while we do allow "24:00:00" as well as "23:59:60" as inputs. However, the range check was miscoded in such a way that it would accept "23:59:60.nnn" with a nonzero fraction. For time or timetz, the stored result would then be greater than "24:00:00" which would fail dump/reload, not to mention possibly confusing other operations. Fix by explicitly calculating the result and making sure it does not exceed 24 hours. (This calculation is redundant with what will happen later in tm2time or tm2timetz. Maybe someday somebody will find that annoying enough to justify refactoring to avoid the duplication; but that seems too invasive for a back-patched bug fix, and the cost is probably unmeasurable anyway.) Note that this change also rejects such input as the time portion of a timestamp(tz) value. Back-patch to v10. The bug is far older, but to change this pre-v10 we'd need to ensure that the logic behaves sanely with float timestamps, which is possibly nontrivial due to roundoff considerations. Doesn't really seem worth troubling with. Per report from Christoph Berg. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200520125807.GB296739@msg.df7cb.de
* Run pgindent with new pg_bsd_indent version 2.1.1.Tom Lane2020-05-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | Thomas Munro fixed a longstanding annoyance in pg_bsd_indent, that it would misformat lines containing IsA() macros on the assumption that the IsA() call should be treated like a cast. This improves some other cases involving field/variable names that match typedefs, too. The only places that get worse are a couple of uses of the OpenSSL macro STACK_OF(); we'll gladly take that trade-off. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200114221814.GA19630@alvherre.pgsql
* Add comments linking pg_strftime to timestamptz_to_strAlvaro Herrera2020-05-151-0/+2
|
* Dial back -Wimplicit-fallthrough to level 3Alvaro Herrera2020-05-131-27/+27
| | | | | | | | | The additional pain from level 4 is excessive for the gain. Also revert all the source annotation changes to their original wordings, to avoid back-patching pain. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31166.1589378554@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Add -Wimplicit-fallthrough to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGSAlvaro Herrera2020-05-121-27/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Use it at level 4, a bit more restrictive than the default level, and tweak our commanding comments to FALLTHROUGH. (However, leave zic.c alone, since it's external code; to avoid the warnings that would appear there, change CFLAGS for that file in the Makefile.) Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200412081825.qyo5vwwco3fv4gdo@nol Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/E1fDenm-0000C8-IJ@gemulon.postgresql.org
* Introduce macros for typalign and typstorage constants.Tom Lane2020-03-041-8/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our usual practice for "poor man's enum" catalog columns is to define macros for the possible values and use those, not literal constants, in C code. But for some reason lost in the mists of time, this was never done for typalign/attalign or typstorage/attstorage. It's never too late to make it better though, so let's do that. The reason I got interested in this right now is the need to duplicate some uses of the TYPSTORAGE constants in an upcoming ALTER TYPE patch. But in general, this sort of change aids greppability and readability, so it's a good idea even without any specific motivation. I may have missed a few places that could be converted, and it's even more likely that pending patches will re-introduce some hard-coded references. But that's not fatal --- there's no expectation that we'd actually change any of these values. We can clean up stragglers over time. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16457.1583189537@sss.pgh.pa.us
* Clean up newlines following left parenthesesAlvaro Herrera2020-01-301-4/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | We used to strategically place newlines after some function call left parentheses to make pgindent move the argument list a few chars to the left, so that the whole line would fit under 80 chars. However, pgindent no longer does that, so the newlines just made the code vertically longer for no reason. Remove those newlines, and reflow some of those lines for some extra naturality. Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200129200401.GA6303@alvherre.pgsql
* Update copyrights for 2020Bruce Momjian2020-01-011-1/+1
| | | | Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
* Fix EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM timestamp) for years BC.Tom Lane2019-12-121-0/+7
| | | | | | | | | The test cases added by commit 26ae3aa80 exposed an old oversight in timestamp[tz]_part: they didn't correct the result of date2isoyear() for BC years, so that we produced an off-by-one answer for such years. Fix that, and back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/SG2PR06MB37762CAE45DB0F6CA7001EA9B6550@SG2PR06MB3776.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
* Remove redundant function calls in timestamp[tz]_part().Tom Lane2019-12-121-16/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The DTK_DOW/DTK_ISODOW and DTK_DOY switch cases in timestamp_part() and timestamptz_part() contained calls of timestamp2tm() that were fully redundant with the ones done just above the switch. This evidently crept in during commit 258ee1b63, which relocated that code from another place where the calls were indeed needed. Just delete the redundant calls. I (tgl) noted that our test coverage of these functions left quite a bit to be desired, so extend timestamp.sql and timestamptz.sql to cover all the branches. Back-patch to all supported branches, as the previous commit was. There's no real issue here other than some wasted cycles in some not-too-heavily-used code paths, but the test coverage seems valuable. Report and patch by Li Japin; test case adjustments by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/SG2PR06MB37762CAE45DB0F6CA7001EA9B6550@SG2PR06MB3776.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
* Fix integer-overflow edge case detection in interval_mul and pgbench.Tom Lane2019-11-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch adopts the overflow check logic introduced by commit cbdb8b4c0 into two more places. interval_mul() failed to notice if it computed a new microseconds value that was one more than INT64_MAX, and pgbench's double-to-int64 logic had the same sorts of edge-case problems that cbdb8b4c0 fixed in the core code. To make this easier to get right in future, put the guts of the checks into new macros in c.h, and add commentary about how to use the macros correctly. Back-patch to all supported branches, as we did with the previous fix. Yuya Watari Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ2pMkbkkFw2hb9Qb1Zj8d06EhWAQXFLy73St4qWv6aX=vqnjw@mail.gmail.com
View Lorry Controller Status