diff options
| author | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> | 2018-02-10 10:15:04 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> | 2018-02-10 10:15:04 -0500 |
| commit | ccb6896d0717c83147a43f4e25f7f76c9a8807e4 (patch) | |
| tree | 31a2590b5e1981d40d21a1132f6cd5e3f9a46b34 /CHANGES.rst | |
| parent | cbfefaeed86e276677d4c0aa56c5897eb67dcf10 (diff) | |
| download | python-coveragepy-ccb6896d0717c83147a43f4e25f7f76c9a8807e4.tar.gz | |
Oops, omitting inside a source package didn't work. Now it does. #638
Diffstat (limited to 'CHANGES.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | CHANGES.rst | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/CHANGES.rst b/CHANGES.rst index 3779a00..ad401eb 100644 --- a/CHANGES.rst +++ b/CHANGES.rst @@ -19,10 +19,16 @@ Change history for Coverage.py Unreleased ---------- +- Now that 4.5 properly separated the ``[run] omit`` and ``[report] omit`` + settings, and old bug has become apparent. If you specified a package name + for ``[run] source``, then omit patterns weren't matched inside that package. + This bug (`issue 638`_) is now fixed. + - On Python 3.7, reporting about a decorated function with no body other than a docstring would crash coverage.py with an IndexError (`issue 640`_). This is now fixed. +.. _issue 638: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issues/638/run-omit-is-ignored-since-45 .. _issue 640: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issues/640/indexerror-reporting-on-an-empty-decorated |