summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests/test_oddball.py
blob: 1c92273baecc9020fdcdd7fad81c2134f15591d9 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
"""Oddball cases for testing coverage.py"""

import sys

import coverage
from coverage.files import abs_file

from tests.coveragetest import CoverageTest
from tests import osinfo


class ThreadingTest(CoverageTest):
    """Tests of the threading support."""

    def test_threading(self):
        self.check_coverage("""\
            import threading

            def fromMainThread():
                return "called from main thread"

            def fromOtherThread():
                return "called from other thread"

            def neverCalled():
                return "no one calls me"

            other = threading.Thread(target=fromOtherThread)
            other.start()
            fromMainThread()
            other.join()
            """,
            [1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15], "10")

    def test_thread_run(self):
        self.check_coverage("""\
            import threading

            class TestThread(threading.Thread):
                def run(self):
                    self.a = 5
                    self.do_work()
                    self.a = 7

                def do_work(self):
                    self.a = 10

            thd = TestThread()
            thd.start()
            thd.join()
            """,
            [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14], "")


class RecursionTest(CoverageTest):
    """Check what happens when recursive code gets near limits."""

    def test_short_recursion(self):
        # We can definitely get close to 500 stack frames.
        self.check_coverage("""\
            def recur(n):
                if n == 0:
                    return 0
                else:
                    return recur(n-1)+1

            recur(495)  # We can get at least this many stack frames.
            i = 8       # and this line will be traced
            """,
            [1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8], "")

    def test_long_recursion(self):
        # We can't finish a very deep recursion, but we don't crash.
        with self.assertRaises(RuntimeError):
            self.check_coverage("""\
                def recur(n):
                    if n == 0:
                        return 0
                    else:
                        return recur(n-1)+1

                recur(100000)  # This is definitely too many frames.
                """,
                [1, 2, 3, 5, 7], ""
                )

    def test_long_recursion_recovery(self):
        # Test the core of bug 93: http://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/93
        # When recovering from a stack overflow, the Python trace function is
        # disabled, but the C trace function is not.  So if we're using a
        # Python trace function, we won't trace anything after the stack
        # overflow, and there should be a warning about it.  If we're using
        # the C trace function, only line 3 will be missing, and all else
        # will be traced.

        self.make_file("recur.py", """\
            def recur(n):
                if n == 0:
                    return 0    # never hit
                else:
                    return recur(n-1)+1

            try:
                recur(100000)  # This is definitely too many frames.
            except RuntimeError:
                i = 10
            i = 11
            """)

        cov = coverage.coverage()
        self.start_import_stop(cov, "recur")

        pytrace = (cov.collector.tracer_name() == "PyTracer")
        expected_missing = [3]
        if pytrace:
            expected_missing += [9, 10, 11]

        _, statements, missing, _ = cov.analysis("recur.py")
        self.assertEqual(statements, [1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11])
        self.assertEqual(missing, expected_missing)

        # Get a warning about the stackoverflow effect on the tracing function.
        if pytrace:
            self.assertEqual(cov._warnings,
                ["Trace function changed, measurement is likely wrong: None"]
                )
        else:
            self.assertEqual(cov._warnings, [])


class MemoryLeakTest(CoverageTest):
    """Attempt the impossible: test that memory doesn't leak.

    Note: this test is truly unusual, and has had a colorful history.  See
    for example: https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issue/186

    It may still fail occasionally, especially on PyPy.

    """
    def test_for_leaks(self):
        # Our original bad memory leak only happened on line numbers > 255, so
        # make a code object with more lines than that.  Ugly string mumbo
        # jumbo to get 300 blank lines at the beginning..
        code = """\
            # blank line\n""" * 300 + """\
            def once(x):                                        # line 301
                if x % 100 == 0:
                    raise Exception("100!")
                elif x % 2:
                    return 10
                else:                                           # line 306
                    return 11
            i = 0 # Portable loop without alloc'ing memory.
            while i < ITERS:
                try:
                    once(i)
                except:
                    pass
                i += 1                                          # line 315
            """
        lines = list(range(301, 315))
        lines.remove(306)       # Line 306 is the "else".

        # This is a non-deterministic test, so try it a few times, and fail it
        # only if it predominantly fails.
        fails = 0
        for _ in range(10):
            ram_0 = osinfo.process_ram()
            self.check_coverage(code.replace("ITERS", "10"), lines, "")
            ram_10 = osinfo.process_ram()
            self.check_coverage(code.replace("ITERS", "10000"), lines, "")
            ram_10k = osinfo.process_ram()
            # Running the code 10k times shouldn't grow the ram much more than
            # running it 10 times.
            ram_growth = (ram_10k - ram_10) - (ram_10 - ram_0)
            if ram_growth > 100000:
                fails += 1

        if fails > 8:                                   # pragma: only failure
            self.fail("RAM grew by %d" % (ram_growth))


class PyexpatTest(CoverageTest):
    """Pyexpat screws up tracing. Make sure we've counter-defended properly."""

    def test_pyexpat(self):
        # pyexpat calls the trace function explicitly (inexplicably), and does
        # it wrong for exceptions.  Parsing a DOCTYPE for some reason throws
        # an exception internally, and triggers its wrong behavior.  This test
        # checks that our fake PyTrace_RETURN hack in tracer.c works.  It will
        # also detect if the pyexpat bug is fixed unbeknownst to us, meaning
        # we'd see two RETURNs where there should only be one.

        self.make_file("trydom.py", """\
            import xml.dom.minidom

            XML = '''\\
            <!DOCTYPE fooey SYSTEM "http://www.example.com/example.dtd">
            <root><child/><child/></root>
            '''

            def foo():
                dom = xml.dom.minidom.parseString(XML)
                assert len(dom.getElementsByTagName('child')) == 2
                a = 11

            foo()
            """)

        self.make_file("outer.py", "\n"*100 + "import trydom\na = 102\n")

        cov = coverage.coverage()
        cov.erase()

        # Import the Python file, executing it.
        self.start_import_stop(cov, "outer")

        _, statements, missing, _ = cov.analysis("trydom.py")
        self.assertEqual(statements, [1, 3, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13])
        self.assertEqual(missing, [])

        _, statements, missing, _ = cov.analysis("outer.py")
        self.assertEqual(statements, [101, 102])
        self.assertEqual(missing, [])


class ExceptionTest(CoverageTest):
    """I suspect different versions of Python deal with exceptions differently
    in the trace function.
    """

    def test_exception(self):
        # Python 2.3's trace function doesn't get called with "return" if the
        # scope is exiting due to an exception.  This confounds our trace
        # function which relies on scope announcements to track which files to
        # trace.
        #
        # This test is designed to sniff this out.  Each function in the call
        # stack is in a different file, to try to trip up the tracer.  Each
        # file has active lines in a different range so we'll see if the lines
        # get attributed to the wrong file.

        self.make_file("oops.py", """\
            def oops(args):
                a = 2
                raise Exception("oops")
                a = 4
            """)

        self.make_file("fly.py", "\n"*100 + """\
            def fly(calls):
                a = 2
                calls[0](calls[1:])
                a = 4
            """)

        self.make_file("catch.py", "\n"*200 + """\
            def catch(calls):
                try:
                    a = 3
                    calls[0](calls[1:])
                    a = 5
                except:
                    a = 7
            """)

        self.make_file("doit.py", "\n"*300 + """\
            def doit(calls):
                try:
                    calls[0](calls[1:])
                except:
                    a = 5
            """)

        # Import all the modules before starting coverage, so the def lines
        # won't be in all the results.
        for mod in "oops fly catch doit".split():
            self.import_local_file(mod)

        # Each run nests the functions differently to get different
        # combinations of catching exceptions and letting them fly.
        runs = [
            ("doit fly oops", {
                'doit.py': [302, 303, 304, 305],
                'fly.py': [102, 103],
                'oops.py': [2, 3],
                }),
            ("doit catch oops", {
                'doit.py': [302, 303],
                'catch.py': [202, 203, 204, 206, 207],
                'oops.py': [2, 3],
                }),
            ("doit fly catch oops", {
                'doit.py': [302, 303],
                'fly.py': [102, 103, 104],
                'catch.py': [202, 203, 204, 206, 207],
                'oops.py': [2, 3],
                }),
            ("doit catch fly oops", {
                'doit.py': [302, 303],
                'catch.py': [202, 203, 204, 206, 207],
                'fly.py': [102, 103],
                'oops.py': [2, 3],
                }),
            ]

        for callnames, lines_expected in runs:

            # Make the list of functions we'll call for this test.
            callnames = callnames.split()
            calls = [getattr(sys.modules[cn], cn) for cn in callnames]

            cov = coverage.coverage()
            cov.start()
            # Call our list of functions: invoke the first, with the rest as
            # an argument.
            calls[0](calls[1:])     # pragma: nested
            cov.stop()              # pragma: nested

            # Clean the line data and compare to expected results.
            # The filenames are absolute, so keep just the base.
            clean_lines = {}
            data = cov.get_data()
            for callname in callnames:
                filename = callname + ".py"
                lines = data.lines(abs_file(filename))
                clean_lines[filename] = sorted(lines)

            self.assertEqual(clean_lines, lines_expected)


class DoctestTest(CoverageTest):
    """Tests invoked with doctest should measure properly."""

    def setUp(self):
        super(DoctestTest, self).setUp()

        # Oh, the irony!  This test case exists because Python 2.4's
        # doctest module doesn't play well with coverage.  But nose fixes
        # the problem by monkeypatching doctest.  I want to undo the
        # monkeypatch to be sure I'm getting the doctest module that users
        # of coverage will get.  Deleting the imported module here is
        # enough: when the test imports doctest again, it will get a fresh
        # copy without the monkeypatch.
        del sys.modules['doctest']

    def test_doctest(self):
        self.check_coverage('''\
            def return_arg_or_void(arg):
                """If <arg> is None, return "Void"; otherwise return <arg>

                >>> return_arg_or_void(None)
                'Void'
                >>> return_arg_or_void("arg")
                'arg'
                >>> return_arg_or_void("None")
                'None'
                """
                if arg is None:
                    return "Void"
                else:
                    return arg

            import doctest, sys
            doctest.testmod(sys.modules[__name__])  # we're not __main__ :(
            ''',
            [1, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17], "")


class GettraceTest(CoverageTest):
    """Tests that we work properly with `sys.gettrace()`."""
    def test_round_trip(self):
        self.check_coverage('''\
            import sys
            def foo(n):
                return 3*n
            def bar(n):
                return 5*n
            a = foo(6)
            sys.settrace(sys.gettrace())
            a = bar(8)
            ''',
            [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], "")

    def test_multi_layers(self):
        self.check_coverage('''\
            import sys
            def level1():
                a = 3
                level2()
                b = 5
            def level2():
                c = 7
                sys.settrace(sys.gettrace())
                d = 9
            e = 10
            level1()
            f = 12
            ''',
            [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12], "")


class ExecTest(CoverageTest):
    """Tests of exec."""
    def test_correct_filename(self):
        # https://bitbucket.org/ned/coveragepy/issues/380/code-executed-by-exec-excluded-from
        # Bug was that exec'd files would have their lines attributed to the
        # calling file.  Make two files, both with ~30 lines, but no lines in
        # common.  Line 30 in to_exec.py was recorded as line 30 in main.py,
        # but now it's fixed. :)
        self.make_file("to_exec.py", """\
            \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
            print("var is {0}".format(var))         # line 31
            """)
        self.make_file("main.py", """\
            namespace = {'var': 17}
            with open("to_exec.py") as to_exec_py:
                code = compile(to_exec_py.read(), 'to_exec.py', 'exec')
                exec(code, globals(), namespace)
            \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
            print("done")                           # line 35
            """)

        cov = coverage.coverage()
        self.start_import_stop(cov, "main")

        _, statements, missing, _ = cov.analysis("main.py")
        self.assertEqual(statements, [1, 2, 3, 4, 35])
        self.assertEqual(missing, [])
        _, statements, missing, _ = cov.analysis("to_exec.py")
        self.assertEqual(statements, [31])
        self.assertEqual(missing, [])