1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
|
"""Puts the check_parallel system under test."""
# Copyright (c) 2020-2021 Pierre Sassoulas <pierre.sassoulas@gmail.com>
# Copyright (c) 2020 Frank Harrison <frank@doublethefish.com>
# Copyright (c) 2021 Jaehoon Hwang <jaehoonhwang@users.noreply.github.com>
# Copyright (c) 2021 Daniƫl van Noord <13665637+DanielNoord@users.noreply.github.com>
# Copyright (c) 2021 Julien Palard <julien@palard.fr>
# Copyright (c) 2021 Marc Mueller <30130371+cdce8p@users.noreply.github.com>
# Licensed under the GPL: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html
# For details: https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/blob/main/LICENSE
# pylint: disable=protected-access,missing-function-docstring,no-self-use
import argparse
import multiprocessing
import os
from typing import List
import dill
import pytest
from astroid import nodes
import pylint.interfaces
import pylint.lint.parallel
from pylint.checkers.base_checker import BaseChecker
from pylint.checkers.mapreduce_checker import MapReduceMixin
from pylint.lint import PyLinter
from pylint.lint.parallel import _worker_check_single_file as worker_check_single_file
from pylint.lint.parallel import _worker_initialize as worker_initialize
from pylint.lint.parallel import check_parallel
from pylint.testutils import GenericTestReporter as Reporter
from pylint.typing import FileItem
from pylint.utils import LinterStats, ModuleStats
def _gen_file_data(idx: int = 0) -> FileItem:
"""Generates a file to use as a stream."""
filepath = os.path.abspath(
os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), "input", "similar1")
)
file_data = FileItem(
f"--test-file_data-name-{idx}--",
filepath,
f"--test-file_data-modname-{idx}--",
)
return file_data
def _gen_file_datas(count: int = 1) -> List[FileItem]:
return [_gen_file_data(idx) for idx in range(count)]
class SequentialTestChecker(BaseChecker):
"""A checker that does not need to consolidate data across run invocations."""
__implements__ = (pylint.interfaces.IRawChecker,)
name = "sequential-checker"
test_data = "sequential"
msgs = {
"R9999": (
"Test",
"sequential-test-check",
"Some helpful text.",
)
}
def __init__(self, linter: PyLinter) -> None:
super().__init__(linter)
self.data: List[str] = []
self.linter = linter
def process_module(self, _node: nodes.Module) -> None:
"""Called once per stream/file/astroid object."""
# record the number of invocations with the data object
record = self.test_data + str(len(self.data))
self.data.append(record)
class ParallelTestChecker(BaseChecker, MapReduceMixin):
"""A checker that does need to consolidate data.
To simulate the need to consolidate data, this checker only
reports a message for pairs of files.
On non-parallel builds: it works on all the files in a single run.
On parallel builds: ``lint.parallel`` calls ``open`` once per file.
So if files are treated by separate processes, no messages will be
raised from the individual process, all messages will be raised
from reduce_map_data.
"""
__implements__ = (pylint.interfaces.IRawChecker,)
name = "parallel-checker"
test_data = "parallel"
msgs = {
"R9999": (
"Test %s",
"parallel-test-check",
"Some helpful text.",
)
}
def __init__(self, linter: PyLinter) -> None:
super().__init__(linter)
self.data: List[str] = []
self.linter = linter
def open(self) -> None:
"""Init the checkers: reset statistics information."""
self.linter.stats.reset_node_count()
self.data = []
def close(self) -> None:
for _ in self.data[1::2]: # Work on pairs of files, see class docstring.
self.add_message("R9999", args=("From process_module, two files seen.",))
def get_map_data(self):
return self.data
def reduce_map_data(self, linter: PyLinter, data: List[List[str]]) -> None:
recombined = type(self)(linter)
recombined.open()
aggregated = []
for d in data:
aggregated.extend(d)
for _ in aggregated[1::2]: # Work on pairs of files, see class docstring.
self.add_message("R9999", args=("From reduce_map_data",))
recombined.close()
def process_module(self, _node: nodes.Module) -> None:
"""Called once per stream/file/astroid object."""
# record the number of invocations with the data object
record = self.test_data + str(len(self.data))
self.data.append(record)
class ExtraSequentialTestChecker(SequentialTestChecker):
"""A checker that does not need to consolidate data across run invocations."""
name = "extra-sequential-checker"
test_data = "extra-sequential"
class ExtraParallelTestChecker(ParallelTestChecker):
"""A checker that does need to consolidate data across run invocations."""
name = "extra-parallel-checker"
test_data = "extra-parallel"
class ThirdSequentialTestChecker(SequentialTestChecker):
"""A checker that does not need to consolidate data across run invocations."""
name = "third-sequential-checker"
test_data = "third-sequential"
class ThirdParallelTestChecker(ParallelTestChecker):
"""A checker that does need to consolidate data across run invocations."""
name = "third-parallel-checker"
test_data = "third-parallel"
class TestCheckParallelFramework:
"""Tests the check_parallel() function's framework."""
def setup_class(self):
self._prev_global_linter = pylint.lint.parallel._worker_linter
def teardown_class(self):
pylint.lint.parallel._worker_linter = self._prev_global_linter
def test_worker_initialize(self) -> None:
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
worker_initialize(linter=dill.dumps(linter))
assert isinstance(pylint.lint.parallel._worker_linter, type(linter))
def test_worker_initialize_pickling(self) -> None:
"""Test that we can pickle objects that standard pickling in multiprocessing can't.
See:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8804830/python-multiprocessing-picklingerror-cant-pickle-type-function
https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/pull/5584
"""
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
linter.attribute = argparse.ArgumentParser() # type: ignore[attr-defined]
with multiprocessing.Pool(
2, initializer=worker_initialize, initargs=[dill.dumps(linter)]
) as pool:
pool.imap_unordered(print, [1, 2])
def test_worker_check_single_file_uninitialised(self) -> None:
pylint.lint.parallel._worker_linter = None
with pytest.raises( # Objects that do not match the linter interface will fail
Exception, match="Worker linter not yet initialised"
):
worker_check_single_file(_gen_file_data())
def test_worker_check_single_file_no_checkers(self) -> None:
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
worker_initialize(linter=dill.dumps(linter))
(
_, # proc-id
name,
_, # file_path
_, # base_name
msgs,
stats,
msg_status,
_, # mapreduce_data
) = worker_check_single_file(_gen_file_data())
assert name == "--test-file_data-name-0--"
assert not msgs
no_errors_status = 0
assert no_errors_status == msg_status
assert {
"--test-file_data-name-0--": {
"convention": 0,
"error": 0,
"fatal": 0,
"info": 0,
"refactor": 0,
"statement": 18,
"warning": 0,
}
} == stats.by_module
assert not stats.by_msg
assert stats.convention == 0
assert stats.error == 0
assert stats.fatal == 0
assert stats.info == 0
assert stats.refactor == 0
assert stats.statement == 18
assert stats.warning == 0
def test_worker_check_sequential_checker(self) -> None:
"""Same as test_worker_check_single_file_no_checkers with SequentialTestChecker."""
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
worker_initialize(linter=dill.dumps(linter))
# Add the only checker we care about in this test
linter.register_checker(SequentialTestChecker(linter))
(
_, # proc-id
name,
_, # file_path
_, # base_name
msgs,
stats,
msg_status,
_, # mapreduce_data
) = worker_check_single_file(_gen_file_data())
# Ensure we return the same data as the single_file_no_checkers test
assert name == "--test-file_data-name-0--"
assert not msgs
no_errors_status = 0
assert no_errors_status == msg_status
assert {
"--test-file_data-name-0--": {
"convention": 0,
"error": 0,
"fatal": 0,
"info": 0,
"refactor": 0,
"statement": 18,
"warning": 0,
}
} == stats.by_module
assert not stats.by_msg
assert stats.convention == 0
assert stats.error == 0
assert stats.fatal == 0
assert stats.info == 0
assert stats.refactor == 0
assert stats.statement == 18
assert stats.warning == 0
class TestCheckParallel:
"""Tests the check_parallel() function."""
def test_sequential_checkers_work(self) -> None:
"""Tests original basic types of checker works as expected in -jN.
This means that a sequential checker should return the same data for a given
file-stream irrespective of whether it's run in -j1 or -jN
"""
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
# Add a sequential checker to ensure it records data against some streams
linter.register_checker(SequentialTestChecker(linter))
# Create a dummy file, the actual contents of which will be ignored by the
# register test checkers, but it will trigger at least a single-job to be run.
single_file_container = _gen_file_datas(count=1)
# Invoke the lint process in a multiprocess way, although we only specify one
# job.
check_parallel(
linter,
jobs=1,
files=iter(single_file_container),
arguments=["--enable", "R9999"],
)
assert len(linter.get_checkers()) == 2, (
"We should only have the 'master' and 'sequential-checker' "
"checkers registered"
)
assert {
"--test-file_data-name-0--": {
"convention": 0,
"error": 0,
"fatal": 0,
"info": 0,
"refactor": 0,
"statement": 18,
"warning": 0,
}
} == linter.stats.by_module
assert not linter.stats.by_msg
assert linter.stats.convention == 0
assert linter.stats.error == 0
assert linter.stats.fatal == 0
assert linter.stats.info == 0
assert linter.stats.refactor == 0
assert linter.stats.statement == 18
assert linter.stats.warning == 0
# now run the regular mode of checking files and check that, in this proc, we
# collect the right data
filepath = [single_file_container[0][1]] # get the filepath element
linter.check(filepath)
assert {
"input.similar1": { # module is the only change from previous
"convention": 0,
"error": 0,
"fatal": 0,
"info": 0,
"refactor": 0,
"statement": 18,
"warning": 0,
}
} == linter.stats.by_module
assert not linter.stats.by_msg
assert linter.stats.convention == 0
assert linter.stats.error == 0
assert linter.stats.fatal == 0
assert linter.stats.info == 0
assert linter.stats.refactor == 0
assert linter.stats.statement == 18
assert linter.stats.warning == 0
def test_invoke_single_job(self) -> None:
"""Tests basic checkers functionality using just a single workderdo.
This is *not* the same -j1 and does not happen under normal operation
"""
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
linter.register_checker(SequentialTestChecker(linter))
# Create a dummy file, the actual contents of which will be ignored by the
# register test checkers, but it will trigger at least a single-job to be run.
single_file_container = _gen_file_datas(count=1)
# Invoke the lint process in a multiprocess way, although we only specify one
# job.
check_parallel(
linter, jobs=1, files=iter(single_file_container), arguments=None
)
assert {
"--test-file_data-name-0--": {
"convention": 0,
"error": 0,
"fatal": 0,
"info": 0,
"refactor": 0,
"statement": 18,
"warning": 0,
}
} == linter.stats.by_module
assert not linter.stats.by_msg
assert linter.stats.convention == 0
assert linter.stats.error == 0
assert linter.stats.fatal == 0
assert linter.stats.info == 0
assert linter.stats.refactor == 0
assert linter.stats.statement == 18
assert linter.stats.warning == 0
assert linter.msg_status == 0, "We expect a single-file check to exit cleanly"
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"num_files,num_jobs,num_checkers",
[
(1, 2, 1),
(1, 2, 2),
(1, 2, 3),
(2, 2, 1),
(2, 2, 2),
(2, 2, 3),
(3, 2, 1),
(3, 2, 2),
(3, 2, 3),
(3, 1, 1),
(3, 1, 2),
(3, 1, 3),
(10, 2, 1),
(10, 2, 2),
(10, 2, 3),
],
)
def test_compare_workers_to_single_proc(self, num_files, num_jobs, num_checkers):
"""Compares the 3 key parameters for check_parallel() produces the same results.
The intent here is to ensure that the check_parallel() operates on each file,
without ordering issues, irrespective of the number of workers used and the
number of checkers applied.
This test becomes more important if we want to change how we parametrise the
checkers, for example if we aim to batch the files across jobs.
"""
# define the stats we expect to get back from the runs, these should only vary
# with the number of files.
expected_stats = LinterStats(
by_module={
# pylint: disable-next=consider-using-f-string
"--test-file_data-name-%d--"
% idx: ModuleStats(
convention=0,
error=0,
fatal=0,
info=0,
refactor=0,
statement=18,
warning=0,
)
for idx in range(num_files)
}
)
expected_stats.by_msg = {}
expected_stats.convention = 0
expected_stats.error = 0
expected_stats.fatal = 0
expected_stats.info = 0
expected_stats.refactor = 0
expected_stats.statement = 18 * num_files
expected_stats.warning = 0
file_infos = _gen_file_datas(num_files)
# Loop for single-proc and mult-proc, so we can ensure the same linter-config
for do_single_proc in range(2):
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
# Assign between 1 and 3 checkers to the linter, they should not change the
# results of the lint
linter.register_checker(SequentialTestChecker(linter))
if num_checkers > 1:
linter.register_checker(ExtraSequentialTestChecker(linter))
if num_checkers > 2:
linter.register_checker(ThirdSequentialTestChecker(linter))
if do_single_proc:
# establish the baseline
assert (
linter.config.jobs == 1
), "jobs>1 are ignored when calling _check_files"
linter._check_files(linter.get_ast, file_infos)
assert linter.msg_status == 0, "We should not fail the lint"
stats_single_proc = linter.stats
else:
check_parallel(
linter,
jobs=num_jobs,
files=file_infos,
arguments=None,
)
stats_check_parallel = linter.stats
assert linter.msg_status == 0, "We should not fail the lint"
assert str(stats_single_proc) == str(
stats_check_parallel
), "Single-proc and check_parallel() should return the same thing"
assert str(stats_check_parallel) == str(
expected_stats
), "The lint is returning unexpected results, has something changed?"
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"num_files,num_jobs,num_checkers",
[
(2, 2, 1),
(2, 2, 2),
(2, 2, 3),
(3, 2, 1),
(3, 2, 2),
(3, 2, 3),
(3, 1, 1),
(3, 1, 2),
(3, 1, 3),
(10, 2, 1),
(10, 2, 2),
(10, 2, 3),
],
)
def test_map_reduce(self, num_files, num_jobs, num_checkers):
"""Compares the 3 key parameters for check_parallel() produces the same results.
The intent here is to validate the reduce step: no stats should be lost.
Checks regression of https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/4118
"""
# define the stats we expect to get back from the runs, these should only vary
# with the number of files.
file_infos = _gen_file_datas(num_files)
# Loop for single-proc and mult-proc, so we can ensure the same linter-config
for do_single_proc in range(2):
linter = PyLinter(reporter=Reporter())
# Assign between 1 and 3 checkers to the linter, they should not change the
# results of the lint
linter.register_checker(ParallelTestChecker(linter))
if num_checkers > 1:
linter.register_checker(ExtraParallelTestChecker(linter))
if num_checkers > 2:
linter.register_checker(ThirdParallelTestChecker(linter))
if do_single_proc:
# establish the baseline
assert (
linter.config.jobs == 1
), "jobs>1 are ignored when calling _check_files"
linter._check_files(linter.get_ast, file_infos)
stats_single_proc = linter.stats
else:
check_parallel(
linter,
jobs=num_jobs,
files=file_infos,
arguments=None,
)
stats_check_parallel = linter.stats
assert str(stats_single_proc.by_msg) == str(
stats_check_parallel.by_msg
), "Single-proc and check_parallel() should return the same thing"
|