summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRaphaël Barrois <raphael.barrois@polytechnique.org>2015-09-15 23:18:13 +0200
committerRaphaël Barrois <raphael.barrois@polytechnique.org>2015-09-15 23:40:59 +0200
commit2ed3d39c291080c61edd9139370939e1fdc3209a (patch)
tree22a90dfae0e0fc9fd7949ca18e7e47daa8f8aabb /tests
parent4aac5768db2fc158fa87900b54210ecba4dfe6d5 (diff)
downloadsemantic-version-2ed3d39c291080c61edd9139370939e1fdc3209a.tar.gz
Forbid build metadata ordering (See #18)
SemVer 2.0.0 states that "Build metadata SHOULD be ignored when determining version precedence". This means that, when comparing ``0.1.0+1`` to ``0.1.0+bcd``:: >>> Version('0.1.0+1') == Version('0.1.0+bcd') False >>> Version('0.1.0+1') != Version('0.1.0+bcd') True >>> Version('0.1.0+1') < Version('0.1.0+bcd') False >>> Version('0.1.0+1') > Version('0.1.0+bcd') False >>> Version('0.1.0+1') <= Version('0.1.0+bcd') False >>> Version('0.1.0+1') >= Version('0.1.0+bcd') False >>> compare(Version('0.1.0+1'), Version('0.1.0+bcd')) NotImplemented This change also has the following effects: - When including build metadata in a ``Spec``, the only valid options are ``Spec('==0.1.0+sth')`` and ``Spec('!=0.1.0+sth')`` - The meaning of ``Spec('==0.1.0+')`` is now "Only version 0.1.0 without build metadata" - ``Spec('==0.1.0')`` now matches ``Version('0.1.0+anything')``
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rwxr-xr-xtests/test_base.py44
-rwxr-xr-xtests/test_match.py32
-rwxr-xr-xtests/test_parsing.py35
-rw-r--r--tests/test_spec.py7
4 files changed, 79 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/tests/test_base.py b/tests/test_base.py
index df5d4ee..ae23d86 100755
--- a/tests/test_base.py
+++ b/tests/test_base.py
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ class TopLevelTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
('0.1.1', '0.1.1', 0),
('0.1.1', '0.1.0', 1),
('0.1.0-alpha', '0.1.0', -1),
- ('0.1.0-alpha+2', '0.1.0-alpha', 1),
+ ('0.1.0-alpha+2', '0.1.0-alpha', NotImplemented),
)
def test_compare(self):
@@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ class VersionTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
'1.1.2': (1, 1, 2, None, None),
'1.1.3-rc4.5': (1, 1, 3, ('rc4', '5'), None),
'1.0.0-': (1, 0, 0, (), None),
- '1.0.0+': (1, 0, 0, (), ()),
'1.0.0-rc.1+build.1': (1, 0, 0, ('rc', '1'), ('build', '1')),
'1.0.0+0.3.7': (1, 0, 0, (), ('0', '3', '7')),
'1.3.7+build': (1, 3, 7, (), ('build',)),
@@ -272,18 +271,29 @@ class VersionTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
class SpecItemTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+ invalids = [
+ '<=0.1.1+build3',
+ '<=0.1.1+',
+ '>0.2.3-rc2+',
+ ]
+
+ def test_invalids(self):
+ for invalid in self.invalids:
+ with self.assertRaises(ValueError, msg="SpecItem(%r) should be invalid" % invalid):
+ _v = base.SpecItem(invalid)
+
components = {
'==0.1.0': (base.SpecItem.KIND_EQUAL, 0, 1, 0, None, None),
'==0.1.2-rc3': (base.SpecItem.KIND_EQUAL, 0, 1, 2, ('rc3',), None),
'==0.1.2+build3.14': (base.SpecItem.KIND_EQUAL, 0, 1, 2, (), ('build3', '14')),
- '<=0.1.1+': (base.SpecItem.KIND_LTE, 0, 1, 1, (), ()),
+ '<=0.1.1': (base.SpecItem.KIND_LTE, 0, 1, 1, None, None),
'<0.1.1': (base.SpecItem.KIND_LT, 0, 1, 1, None, None),
'<=0.1.1': (base.SpecItem.KIND_LTE, 0, 1, 1, None, None),
+ '!=0.1.1+': (base.SpecItem.KIND_NEQ, 0, 1, 1, (), ()),
'<=0.1.1-': (base.SpecItem.KIND_LTE, 0, 1, 1, (), None),
'>=0.2.3-rc2': (base.SpecItem.KIND_GTE, 0, 2, 3, ('rc2',), None),
- '>0.2.3-rc2+': (base.SpecItem.KIND_GT, 0, 2, 3, ('rc2',), ()),
'>=2.0.0': (base.SpecItem.KIND_GTE, 2, 0, 0, None, None),
- '!=0.1.1+': (base.SpecItem.KIND_NEQ, 0, 1, 1, (), ()),
+ '!=0.1.1+rc3': (base.SpecItem.KIND_NEQ, 0, 1, 1, (), ('rc3',)),
'!=0.3.0': (base.SpecItem.KIND_NEQ, 0, 3, 0, None, None),
}
@@ -335,13 +345,17 @@ class SpecItemTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
['0.2.3-rc3', '0.2.3', '0.2.3+1', '0.2.3-rc2', '0.2.3-rc2+1'],
['0.2.3-rc1', '0.2.2'],
),
- '>0.2.3-rc2+': (
- ['0.2.3-rc3', '0.2.3', '0.2.3-rc2+1'],
- ['0.2.3-rc1', '0.2.2', '0.2.3-rc2'],
+ '==0.2.3+': (
+ ['0.2.3'],
+ ['0.2.3+rc1', '0.2.4', '0.2.3-rc2'],
+ ),
+ '!=0.2.3-rc2+12': (
+ ['0.2.3-rc3', '0.2.3', '0.2.3-rc2+1', '0.2.4', '0.2.3-rc3+12'],
+ ['0.2.3-rc2+12'],
),
- '>2.0.0+': (
- ['2.1.1', '2.0.0+b1', '3.1.4'],
- ['1.9.9', '1.9.9999', '2.0.0', '2.0.0-rc4'],
+ '==2.0.0+b1': (
+ ['2.0.0+b1'],
+ ['2.1.1', '1.9.9', '1.9.9999', '2.0.0', '2.0.0-rc4'],
),
'!=0.1.1': (
['0.1.2', '0.1.0', '1.4.2'],
@@ -440,13 +454,17 @@ class SpecTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertTrue(repr(base.SpecItem(spec_text)) in repr(spec_list))
matches = {
+ # At least 0.1.1 including pre-releases, less than 0.1.2 excluding pre-releases
'>=0.1.1,<0.1.2': (
['0.1.1', '0.1.1+4', '0.1.1-alpha'],
['0.1.2-alpha', '0.1.2', '1.3.4'],
),
- '>=0.1.0+,!=0.1.3-rc1,<0.1.4': (
+ # At least 0.1.0 without pre-releases, less than 0.1.4 excluding pre-releases,
+ # neither 0.1.3-rc1 nor any build of that version,
+ # not 0.1.0+b3 precisely
+ '>=0.1.0-,!=0.1.3-rc1,!=0.1.0+b3,<0.1.4': (
['0.1.1', '0.1.0+b4', '0.1.2', '0.1.3-rc2'],
- ['0.0.1', '0.1.4', '0.1.4-alpha', '0.1.3-rc1+4',
+ ['0.0.1', '0.1.0+b3', '0.1.4', '0.1.4-alpha', '0.1.3-rc1+4',
'0.1.0-alpha', '0.2.2', '0.1.4-rc1'],
),
}
diff --git a/tests/test_match.py b/tests/test_match.py
index 155a612..6926e0a 100755
--- a/tests/test_match.py
+++ b/tests/test_match.py
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ class MatchTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
'<=0.1.4a',
'>0.1.1.1',
'~0.1.2-rc23,1',
+ '<0.1.2-rc1.3-14.15+build.2012-01-01.11h34',
]
valid_specs = [
@@ -25,7 +26,7 @@ class MatchTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
'>0.1.2-rc1',
'>=0.1.2-rc1.3.4',
'==0.1.2+build42-12.2012-01-01.12h23',
- '<0.1.2-rc1.3-14.15+build.2012-01-01.11h34',
+ '!=0.1.2-rc1.3-14.15+build.2012-01-01.11h34',
]
matches = {
@@ -53,11 +54,19 @@ class MatchTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
'0.1.2',
'0.1.2+build4',
],
- '<0.1.2+': [
+ '!=0.1.2+': [
+ '0.1.2+1',
+ '0.1.2-rc1',
+ ],
+ '!=0.1.2-': [
'0.1.1',
'0.1.2-rc1',
- '0.1.2-rc1.3.4',
- '0.1.2-rc1+build4.5',
+ ],
+ '!=0.1.2+345': [
+ '0.1.1',
+ '0.1.2-rc1+345',
+ '0.1.2+346',
+ '0.2.3+345',
],
'>=0.1.1': [
'0.1.1',
@@ -72,12 +81,6 @@ class MatchTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
'0.2.0',
'1.0.0',
],
- '>0.1.1+': [
- '0.1.1+b2',
- '0.1.2-rc1',
- '1.1.1',
- '2.0.4',
- ],
'<0.1.1-': [
'0.1.1-alpha',
'0.1.1-rc4',
@@ -87,7 +90,8 @@ class MatchTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def test_invalid(self):
for invalid in self.invalid_specs:
- self.assertRaises(ValueError, semantic_version.Spec, invalid)
+ with self.assertRaises(ValueError, msg="Spec(%r) should be invalid" % invalid):
+ semantic_version.Spec(invalid)
def test_simple(self):
for valid in self.valid_specs:
@@ -122,11 +126,9 @@ class MatchTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertFalse(version in strict_spec, "%r should not be in %r" % (version, strict_spec))
def test_build_check(self):
- strict_spec = semantic_version.Spec('<=0.1.1-rc1+')
- lax_spec = semantic_version.Spec('<=0.1.1-rc1')
+ spec = semantic_version.Spec('<=0.1.1-rc1')
version = semantic_version.Version('0.1.1-rc1+4.2')
- self.assertTrue(version in lax_spec, "%r should be in %r" % (version, lax_spec))
- self.assertFalse(version in strict_spec, "%r should not be in %r" % (version, strict_spec))
+ self.assertTrue(version in spec, "%r should be in %r" % (version, spec))
if __name__ == '__main__': # pragma: no cover
diff --git a/tests/test_parsing.py b/tests/test_parsing.py
index 5112ca5..c7651d2 100755
--- a/tests/test_parsing.py
+++ b/tests/test_parsing.py
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
# Copyright (c) 2012-2014 The python-semanticversion project
# This code is distributed under the two-clause BSD License.
+import itertools
import unittest
import semantic_version
@@ -44,12 +45,8 @@ class ComparisonTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
'1.0.0-beta.2',
'1.0.0-beta.11',
'1.0.0-rc.1',
- '1.0.0-rc.1+build.1',
'1.0.0',
- '1.0.0+0.3.7',
'1.3.7+build',
- '1.3.7+build.2.b8f12d7',
- '1.3.7+build.11.e0f985a',
]
def test_comparisons(self):
@@ -67,6 +64,36 @@ class ComparisonTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
cmp_res = -1 if i < j else (1 if i > j else 0)
self.assertEqual(cmp_res, semantic_version.compare(first, second))
+ unordered = [
+ [
+ '1.0.0-rc.1',
+ '1.0.0-rc.1+build.1',
+ ],
+ [
+ '1.0.0',
+ '1.0.0+0.3.7',
+ ],
+ [
+ '1.3.7',
+ '1.3.7+build',
+ '1.3.7+build.2.b8f12d7',
+ '1.3.7+build.11.e0f985a',
+ ],
+ ]
+
+ def test_unordered(self):
+ for group in self.unordered:
+ for a, b in itertools.combinations(group, 2):
+ v1 = semantic_version.Version(a)
+ v2 = semantic_version.Version(b)
+ self.assertTrue(v1 == v1, "%r != %r" % (v1, v1))
+ self.assertFalse(v1 != v1, "%r != %r" % (v1, v1))
+ self.assertFalse(v1 == v2, "%r == %r" % (v1, v2))
+ self.assertTrue(v1 != v2, "%r !!= %r" % (v1, v2))
+ self.assertFalse(v1 < v2, "%r !< %r" % (v1, v2))
+ self.assertFalse(v1 <= v2, "%r !<= %r" % (v1, v2))
+ self.assertFalse(v2 > v1, "%r !> %r" % (v2, v1))
+ self.assertFalse(v2 >= v1, "%r !>= %r" % (v2, v1))
if __name__ == '__main__': # pragma: no cover
unittest.main()
diff --git a/tests/test_spec.py b/tests/test_spec.py
index 7a645f9..a13cb0b 100644
--- a/tests/test_spec.py
+++ b/tests/test_spec.py
@@ -154,10 +154,3 @@ class FormatTests(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertLess(Version('1.0.0-beta.2'), Version('1.0.0-beta.11'))
self.assertLess(Version('1.0.0-beta.11'), Version('1.0.0-rc.1'))
self.assertLess(Version('1.0.0-rc.1'), Version('1.0.0'))
-
-
-
-class PrecedenceTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
- pass
-
-