diff options
author | Mike Bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com> | 2022-11-13 11:49:43 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mike Bayer <mike_mp@zzzcomputing.com> | 2022-11-15 13:46:02 -0500 |
commit | 93dc7ea1502c37793011b094447641361aff5aba (patch) | |
tree | 2a443b0b902777771e6b18a499e6527de31ee729 /lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py | |
parent | 5fc22d0e645cd560db43fb7fd5072ecbab06128b (diff) | |
download | sqlalchemy-93dc7ea1502c37793011b094447641361aff5aba.tar.gz |
don't invoke fromclause.c when creating an annotated
The ``aliased()`` constructor calls upon ``__clause_element__()``,
which internally annotates a ``FromClause``, like a subquery.
This became expensive as ``AnnotatedFromClause`` has for
many years called upon ``element.c`` so that the full ``.c``
collection is transferred to the Annotated.
Taking this out proved to be challenging. A straight remove
seemed to not break any tests except for the one that
tested the exact condition. Nevertheless this seemed
"spooky" so I instead moved the get of ``.c`` to be in a
memoized proxy method. However, that then exposed
a recursion issue related to loader_criteria; so the
source of that behavior, which was an accidental behavioral
artifact, is now made into an explcicit option that
loader_criteria uses directly.
The accidental behavioral artifact in question is still
kind of strange since I was not able to fully trace out
how it works, but the end result is that fixing the
artifact to be "correct" causes loader_criteria, within
the particular test for #7491, creates a select/
subquery structure with a cycle in it, so compilation fails
with recursion overflow.
The "solution" is to cause the artifact to occur in this
case, which is that the ``AnnotatedFromClause`` will have a
different ``.c`` collection than its element, which is a
subquery. It's not totally clear how a cycle is generated
when this is not done.
This is commit one of two, which goes through
some hoops to make essentially a one-line change.
The next commit will rework ColumnCollection to optimize
the corresponding_column() method significantly.
Fixes: #8796
Change-Id: Id58ae6554db62139462c11a8be7313a3677456ad
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py | 17 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py b/lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py index 43ca84abb..3ce524447 100644 --- a/lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py +++ b/lib/sqlalchemy/sql/annotation.py @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ def _deep_annotate( annotations: _AnnotationDict, exclude: Optional[Sequence[SupportsAnnotations]] = None, detect_subquery_cols: bool = False, + ind_cols_on_fromclause: bool = False, ) -> _SA: """Deep copy the given ClauseElement, annotating each element with the given annotations dictionary. @@ -435,6 +436,16 @@ def _deep_annotate( cloned_ids: Dict[int, SupportsAnnotations] = {} def clone(elem: SupportsAnnotations, **kw: Any) -> SupportsAnnotations: + + # ind_cols_on_fromclause means make sure an AnnotatedFromClause + # has its own .c collection independent of that which its proxying. + # this is used specifically by orm.LoaderCriteriaOption to break + # a reference cycle that it's otherwise prone to building, + # see test_relationship_criteria-> + # test_loader_criteria_subquery_w_same_entity. logic here was + # changed for #8796 and made explicit; previously it occurred + # by accident + kw["detect_subquery_cols"] = detect_subquery_cols id_ = id(elem) @@ -454,7 +465,11 @@ def _deep_annotate( newelem = elem._annotate(annotations) else: newelem = elem - newelem._copy_internals(clone=clone) + + newelem._copy_internals( + clone=clone, ind_cols_on_fromclause=ind_cols_on_fromclause + ) + cloned_ids[id_] = newelem return newelem |