summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSimon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@nokia.com>2012-07-16 14:51:15 +0200
committerSimon Hausmann <simon.hausmann@nokia.com>2012-07-16 14:51:15 +0200
commit4e6b3a206fa4ad8bb0b664f7674c9a70376d6e26 (patch)
tree7bb9ad7e31c24d1cf1707e03e6f1a80f6d033951 /Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp
parent3977e3d2f72f7fe2c887c1ec0e0c342e1d169f42 (diff)
downloadqtwebkit-4e6b3a206fa4ad8bb0b664f7674c9a70376d6e26.tar.gz
Imported WebKit commit 953baa67aa07087b6ecd4199351ec554c724e27d (http://svn.webkit.org/repository/webkit/trunk@122676)
Diffstat (limited to 'Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp')
-rw-r--r--Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp b/Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp
index 73f1eb974..54409514c 100644
--- a/Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp
+++ b/Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest.cpp
@@ -2844,13 +2844,13 @@ TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyBackFaceCullingWithAnimatingTransforms)
EXPECT_EQ(animatingSurface->id(), renderSurfaceLayerList[1]->renderSurface()->layerList()[0]->id());
EXPECT_EQ(childOfAnimatingSurface->id(), renderSurfaceLayerList[1]->renderSurface()->layerList()[1]->id());
- EXPECT_FALSE(child2->visibleLayerRect().isEmpty());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(child2->visibleContentRect().isEmpty());
- // The animating layers should have a visibleLayerRect that represents the area of the front face that is within the viewport.
- EXPECT_EQ(animatingChild->visibleLayerRect(), IntRect(IntPoint(), animatingChild->contentBounds()));
- EXPECT_EQ(animatingSurface->visibleLayerRect(), IntRect(IntPoint(), animatingSurface->contentBounds()));
- // And layers in the subtree of the animating layer should have valid visibleLayerRects also.
- EXPECT_EQ(childOfAnimatingSurface->visibleLayerRect(), IntRect(IntPoint(), childOfAnimatingSurface->contentBounds()));
+ // The animating layers should have a visibleContentRect that represents the area of the front face that is within the viewport.
+ EXPECT_EQ(animatingChild->visibleContentRect(), IntRect(IntPoint(), animatingChild->contentBounds()));
+ EXPECT_EQ(animatingSurface->visibleContentRect(), IntRect(IntPoint(), animatingSurface->contentBounds()));
+ // And layers in the subtree of the animating layer should have valid visibleContentRects also.
+ EXPECT_EQ(childOfAnimatingSurface->visibleContentRect(), IntRect(IntPoint(), childOfAnimatingSurface->contentBounds()));
}
TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyBackFaceCullingWithPreserves3dForFlatteningSurface)
@@ -3208,7 +3208,7 @@ TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyHitTestingForSinglePerspectiveLayer)
TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyHitTestingForSingleLayerWithScaledContents)
{
- // A layer's visibleLayerRect is actually in the layer's content space. The
+ // A layer's visibleContentRect is actually in the layer's content space. The
// screenSpaceTransform converts from the layer's origin space to screen space. This
// test makes sure that hit testing works correctly accounts for the contents scale.
// A contentsScale that is not 1 effectively forces a non-identity transform between
@@ -3216,7 +3216,7 @@ TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyHitTestingForSingleLayerWithScaledContents
// screenSpaceTransformn. The hit testing code must take this into account.
//
// To test this, the layer is positioned at (25, 25), and is size (50, 50). If
- // contentsScale is ignored, then hit testing will mis-interpret the visibleLayerRect
+ // contentsScale is ignored, then hit testing will mis-interpret the visibleContentRect
// as being larger than the actual bounds of the layer.
//
DebugScopedSetImplThread thisScopeIsOnImplThread;
@@ -3242,8 +3242,8 @@ TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyHitTestingForSingleLayerWithScaledContents
CCLayerTreeHostCommon::calculateVisibleAndScissorRects(renderSurfaceLayerList, FloatRect()); // empty scissorRect will help ensure we're hit testing the correct rect.
// Sanity check the scenario we just created.
- // The visibleLayerRect is actually 100x100, even though the layout size of the layer is 50x50, positioned at 25x25.
- EXPECT_INT_RECT_EQ(IntRect(IntPoint::zero(), IntSize(100, 100)), root->visibleLayerRect());
+ // The visibleContentRect is actually 100x100, even though the layout size of the layer is 50x50, positioned at 25x25.
+ EXPECT_INT_RECT_EQ(IntRect(IntPoint::zero(), IntSize(100, 100)), root->visibleContentRect());
ASSERT_EQ(1u, renderSurfaceLayerList.size());
ASSERT_EQ(1u, root->renderSurface()->layerList().size());
@@ -3418,7 +3418,7 @@ TEST(CCLayerTreeHostCommonTest, verifyHitTestingForMultiClippedRotatedLayer)
// (4, 50) is inside the unclipped layer, but that corner of the layer should be
// clipped away by the grandParent and should not get hit. If hit testing blindly uses
- // visibleLayerRect without considering how parent may clip the layer, then hit
+ // visibleContentRect without considering how parent may clip the layer, then hit
// testing would accidentally think that the point successfully hits the layer.
testPoint = IntPoint(4, 50);
resultLayer = CCLayerTreeHostCommon::findLayerThatIsHitByPoint(testPoint, renderSurfaceLayerList);