summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/commands/brpoplpush.json
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Overhauls command summaries and man pages. (#11942)Itamar Haber2023-03-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is an attempt to normalize/formalize command summaries. Main actions performed: * Starts with the continuation of the phrase "The XXXX command, when called, ..." for user commands. * Starts with "An internal command...", "A container command...", etc... when applicable. * Always uses periods. * Refrains from referring to other commands. If this is needed, backquotes should be used for command names. * Tries to be very clear about the data type when applicable. * Tries to mention additional effects, e.g. "The key is created if it doesn't exist" and "The set is deleted if the last member is removed." * Prefers being terse over verbose. * Tries to be consistent.
* Support for RM_Call on blocking commands (#11568)Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)2023-03-161-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow running blocking commands from within a module using `RM_Call`. Today, when `RM_Call` is used, the fake client that is used to run command is marked with `CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING` flag. This flag tells the command that it is not allowed to block the client and in case it needs to block, it must fallback to some alternative (either return error or perform some default behavior). For example, `BLPOP` fallback to simple `LPOP` if it is not allowed to block. All the commands must respect the `CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING` flag (including module commands). When the command invocation finished, Redis asserts that the client was not blocked. This PR introduces the ability to call blocking command using `RM_Call` by passing a callback that will be called when the client will get unblocked. In order to do that, the user must explicitly say that he allow to perform blocking command by passing a new format specifier argument, `K`, to the `RM_Call` function. This new flag will tell Redis that it is allow to run blocking command and block the client. In case the command got blocked, Redis will return a new type of call reply (`REDISMODULE_REPLY_PROMISE`). This call reply indicates that the command got blocked and the user can set the on_unblocked handler using `RM_CallReplyPromiseSetUnblockHandler`. When clients gets unblocked, it eventually reaches `processUnblockedClients` function. This is where we check if the client is a fake module client and if it is, we call the unblock callback instead of performing the usual unblock operations. **Notice**: `RM_CallReplyPromiseSetUnblockHandler` must be called atomically along side the command invocation (without releasing the Redis lock in between). In addition, unlike other CallReply types, the promise call reply must be released by the module when the Redis GIL is acquired. The module can abort the execution on the blocking command (if it was not yet executed) using `RM_CallReplyPromiseAbort`. the API will return `REDISMODULE_OK` on success and `REDISMODULE_ERR` if the operation is already executed. **Notice** that in case of misbehave module, Abort might finished successfully but the operation will not really be aborted. This can only happened if the module do not respect the disconnect callback of the blocked client. For pure Redis commands this can not happened. ### Atomicity Guarantees The API promise that the unblock handler will run atomically as an execution unit. This means that all the operation performed on the unblock handler will be wrapped with a multi exec transaction when replicated to the replica and AOF. The API **do not** grantee any other atomicity properties such as when the unblock handler will be called. This gives us the flexibility to strengthen the grantees (or not) in the future if we will decide that we need a better guarantees. That said, the implementation **does** provide a better guarantees when performing pure Redis blocking command like `BLPOP`. In this case the unblock handler will run atomically with the operation that got unblocked (for example, in case of `BLPOP`, the unblock handler will run atomically with the `LPOP` operation that run when the command got unblocked). This is an implementation detail that might be change in the future and the module writer should not count on that. ### Calling blocking commands while running on script mode (`S`) `RM_Call` script mode (`S`) was introduced on #0372. It is used for usecases where the command that was invoked on `RM_Call` comes from a user input and we want to make sure the user will not run dangerous commands like `shutdown`. Some command, such as `BLPOP`, are marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, which means they will not be allowed on script mode. Those commands are marked with `NO_SCRIPT` just because they are blocking commands and not because they are dangerous. Now that we can run blocking commands on RM_Call, there is no real reason not to allow such commands on script mode. The underline problem is that the `NO_SCRIPT` flag is abused to also mark some of the blocking commands (notice that those commands know not to block the client if it is not allowed to do so, and have a fallback logic to such cases. So even if those commands were not marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, it would not harm Redis, and today we can already run those commands within multi exec). In addition, not all blocking commands are marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, for example `blmpop` are not marked and can run from within a script. Those facts shows that there are some ambiguity about the meaning of the `NO_SCRIPT` flag, and its not fully clear where it should be use. The PR suggest that blocking commands should not be marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, those commands should handle `CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING` flag and only block when it's safe (like they already does today). To achieve that, the PR removes the `NO_SCRIPT` flag from the following commands: * `blmove` * `blpop` * `brpop` * `brpoplpush` * `bzpopmax` * `bzpopmin` * `wait` This might be considered a breaking change as now, on scripts, instead of getting `command is not allowed from script` error, the user will get some fallback behavior base on the command implementation. That said, the change matches the behavior of scripts and multi exec with respect to those commands and allow running them on `RM_Call` even when script mode is used. ### Additional RedisModule API and changes * `RM_BlockClientSetPrivateData` - Set private data on the blocked client without the need to unblock the client. This allows up to set the promise CallReply as the private data of the blocked client and abort it if the client gets disconnected. * `RM_BlockClientGetPrivateData` - Return the current private data set on a blocked client. We need it so we will have access to this private data on the disconnect callback. * On RM_Call, the returned reply will be added to the auto memory context only if auto memory is enabled, this allows us to keep the call reply for longer time then the context lifetime and does not force an unneeded borrow relationship between the CallReply and the RedisModuleContext.
* Add reply_schema to command json files (internal for now) (#10273)guybe72023-03-111-0/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Work in progress towards implementing a reply schema as part of COMMAND DOCS, see #9845 Since ironing the details of the reply schema of each and every command can take a long time, we would like to merge this PR when the infrastructure is ready, and let this mature in the unstable branch. Meanwhile the changes of this PR are internal, they are part of the repo, but do not affect the produced build. ### Background In #9656 we add a lot of information about Redis commands, but we are missing information about the replies ### Motivation 1. Documentation. This is the primary goal. 2. It should be possible, based on the output of COMMAND, to be able to generate client code in typed languages. In order to do that, we need Redis to tell us, in detail, what each reply looks like. 3. We would like to build a fuzzer that verifies the reply structure (for now we use the existing testsuite, see the "Testing" section) ### Schema The idea is to supply some sort of schema for the various replies of each command. The schema will describe the conceptual structure of the reply (for generated clients), as defined in RESP3. Note that the reply structure itself may change, depending on the arguments (e.g. `XINFO STREAM`, with and without the `FULL` modifier) We decided to use the standard json-schema (see https://json-schema.org/) as the reply-schema. Example for `BZPOPMIN`: ``` "reply_schema": { "oneOf": [ { "description": "Timeout reached and no elements were popped.", "type": "null" }, { "description": "The keyname, popped member, and its score.", "type": "array", "minItems": 3, "maxItems": 3, "items": [ { "description": "Keyname", "type": "string" }, { "description": "Member", "type": "string" }, { "description": "Score", "type": "number" } ] } ] } ``` #### Notes 1. It is ok that some commands' reply structure depends on the arguments and it's the caller's responsibility to know which is the relevant one. this comes after looking at other request-reply systems like OpenAPI, where the reply schema can also be oneOf and the caller is responsible to know which schema is the relevant one. 2. The reply schemas will describe RESP3 replies only. even though RESP3 is structured, we want to use reply schema for documentation (and possibly to create a fuzzer that validates the replies) 3. For documentation, the description field will include an explanation of the scenario in which the reply is sent, including any relation to arguments. for example, for `ZRANGE`'s two schemas we will need to state that one is with `WITHSCORES` and the other is without. 4. For documentation, there will be another optional field "notes" in which we will add a short description of the representation in RESP2, in case it's not trivial (RESP3's `ZRANGE`'s nested array vs. RESP2's flat array, for example) Given the above: 1. We can generate the "return" section of all commands in [redis-doc](https://redis.io/commands/) (given that "description" and "notes" are comprehensive enough) 2. We can generate a client in a strongly typed language (but the return type could be a conceptual `union` and the caller needs to know which schema is relevant). see the section below for RESP2 support. 3. We can create a fuzzer for RESP3. ### Limitations (because we are using the standard json-schema) The problem is that Redis' replies are more diverse than what the json format allows. This means that, when we convert the reply to a json (in order to validate the schema against it), we lose information (see the "Testing" section below). The other option would have been to extend the standard json-schema (and json format) to include stuff like sets, bulk-strings, error-string, etc. but that would mean also extending the schema-validator - and that seemed like too much work, so we decided to compromise. Examples: 1. We cannot tell the difference between an "array" and a "set" 2. We cannot tell the difference between simple-string and bulk-string 3. we cannot verify true uniqueness of items in commands like ZRANGE: json-schema doesn't cover the case of two identical members with different scores (e.g. `[["m1",6],["m1",7]]`) because `uniqueItems` compares (member,score) tuples and not just the member name. ### Testing This commit includes some changes inside Redis in order to verify the schemas (existing and future ones) are indeed correct (i.e. describe the actual response of Redis). To do that, we added a debugging feature to Redis that causes it to produce a log of all the commands it executed and their replies. For that, Redis needs to be compiled with `-DLOG_REQ_RES` and run with `--reg-res-logfile <file> --client-default-resp 3` (the testsuite already does that if you run it with `--log-req-res --force-resp3`) You should run the testsuite with the above args (and `--dont-clean`) in order to make Redis generate `.reqres` files (same dir as the `stdout` files) which contain request-response pairs. These files are later on processed by `./utils/req-res-log-validator.py` which does: 1. Goes over req-res files, generated by redis-servers, spawned by the testsuite (see logreqres.c) 2. For each request-response pair, it validates the response against the request's reply_schema (obtained from the extended COMMAND DOCS) 5. In order to get good coverage of the Redis commands, and all their different replies, we chose to use the existing redis test suite, rather than attempt to write a fuzzer. #### Notes about RESP2 1. We will not be able to use the testing tool to verify RESP2 replies (we are ok with that, it's time to accept RESP3 as the future RESP) 2. Since the majority of the test suite is using RESP2, and we want the server to reply with RESP3 so that we can validate it, we will need to know how to convert the actual reply to the one expected. - number and boolean are always strings in RESP2 so the conversion is easy - objects (maps) are always a flat array in RESP2 - others (nested array in RESP3's `ZRANGE` and others) will need some special per-command handling (so the client will not be totally auto-generated) Example for ZRANGE: ``` "reply_schema": { "anyOf": [ { "description": "A list of member elements", "type": "array", "uniqueItems": true, "items": { "type": "string" } }, { "description": "Members and their scores. Returned in case `WITHSCORES` was used.", "notes": "In RESP2 this is returned as a flat array", "type": "array", "uniqueItems": true, "items": { "type": "array", "minItems": 2, "maxItems": 2, "items": [ { "description": "Member", "type": "string" }, { "description": "Score", "type": "number" } ] } } ] } ``` ### Other changes 1. Some tests that behave differently depending on the RESP are now being tested for both RESP, regardless of the special log-req-res mode ("Pub/Sub PING" for example) 2. Update the history field of CLIENT LIST 3. Added basic tests for commands that were not covered at all by the testsuite ### TODO - [x] (maybe a different PR) add a "condition" field to anyOf/oneOf schemas that refers to args. e.g. when `SET` return NULL, the condition is `arguments.get||arguments.condition`, for `OK` the condition is `!arguments.get`, and for `string` the condition is `arguments.get` - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11896 - [x] (maybe a different PR) also run `runtest-cluster` in the req-res logging mode - [x] add the new tests to GH actions (i.e. compile with `-DLOG_REQ_RES`, run the tests, and run the validator) - [x] (maybe a different PR) figure out a way to warn about (sub)schemas that are uncovered by the output of the tests - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11897 - [x] (probably a separate PR) add all missing schemas - [x] check why "SDOWN is triggered by misconfigured instance replying with errors" fails with --log-req-res - [x] move the response transformers to their own file (run both regular, cluster, and sentinel tests - need to fight with the tcl including mechanism a bit) - [x] issue: module API - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11898 - [x] (probably a separate PR): improve schemas: add `required` to `object`s - https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/11899 Co-authored-by: Ozan Tezcan <ozantezcan@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Hanna Fadida <hanna.fadida@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by: Shaya Potter <shaya@redislabs.com>
* Add command tips to COMMAND DOCS (#10104)guybe72022-01-201-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adding command tips (see https://redis.io/topics/command-tips) to commands. Breaking changes: 1. Removed the "random" and "sort_for_script" flags. They are now command tips. (this isn't affecting redis behavior since #9812, but could affect some client applications that's relying on COMMAND command flags) Summary of changes: 1. add BLOCKING flag (new flag) for all commands that could block. The ACL category with the same name is now implicit. 2. move RANDOM flag to a `nondeterministic_output` tip 3. move SORT_FOR_SCRIPT flag to `nondeterministic_output_order` tip 3. add REQUEST_POLICY and RESPONSE_POLICY where appropriate as documented in the tips 4. deprecate (ignore) the `random` flag for RM_CreateCommand Other notes: 1. Proxies need to send `RANDOMKEY` to all shards and then select one key randomly. The other option is to pick a random shard and transfer `RANDOMKEY `to it, but that scheme fails if this specific shard is empty 2. Remove CMD_RANDOM from `XACK` (i.e. XACK does not have RANDOM_OUTPUT) It was added in 9e4fb96ca12476b1c7468b143efca86b478bfb4a, I guess by mistake. Also from `(P)EXPIRETIME` (new command, was flagged "random" by mistake). 3. Add `nondeterministic_output` to `OBJECT ENCODING` (for the same reason `XTRIM` has it: the reply may differ depending on the internal representation in memory) 4. RANDOM on `HGETALL` was wrong (there due to a limitation of the old script sorting logic), now it's `nondeterministic_output_order` 5. Unrelated: Hide CMD_PROTECTED from COMMAND
* New detailed key-spec flags (RO, RW, OW, RM, ACCESS, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE) ↵Oran Agra2022-01-181-3/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (#10122) The new ACL key based permissions in #9974 require the key-specs (#8324) to have more explicit flags rather than just READ and WRITE. See discussion in #10040 This PR defines two groups of flags: One about how redis internally handles the key (mutually-exclusive). The other is about the logical operation done from the user's point of view (3 mutually exclusive write flags, and one read flag, all optional). In both groups, if we can't explicitly flag something as explicit read-only, delete-only, or insert-only, we flag it as `RW` or `UPDATE`. here's the definition from the code: ``` /* Key-spec flags * * -------------- */ /* The following refer what the command actually does with the value or metadata * of the key, and not necessarily the user data or how it affects it. * Each key-spec may must have exaclty one of these. Any operation that's not * distinctly deletion, overwrite or read-only would be marked as RW. */ #define CMD_KEY_RO (1ULL<<0) /* Read-Only - Reads the value of the key, but * doesn't necessarily returns it. */ #define CMD_KEY_RW (1ULL<<1) /* Read-Write - Modifies the data stored in the * value of the key or its metadata. */ #define CMD_KEY_OW (1ULL<<2) /* Overwrite - Overwrites the data stored in * the value of the key. */ #define CMD_KEY_RM (1ULL<<3) /* Deletes the key. */ /* The follwing refer to user data inside the value of the key, not the metadata * like LRU, type, cardinality. It refers to the logical operation on the user's * data (actual input strings / TTL), being used / returned / copied / changed, * It doesn't refer to modification or returning of metadata (like type, count, * presence of data). Any write that's not INSERT or DELETE, would be an UPADTE. * Each key-spec may have one of the writes with or without access, or none: */ #define CMD_KEY_ACCESS (1ULL<<4) /* Returns, copies or uses the user data from * the value of the key. */ #define CMD_KEY_UPDATE (1ULL<<5) /* Updates data to the value, new value may * depend on the old value. */ #define CMD_KEY_INSERT (1ULL<<6) /* Adds data to the value with no chance of, * modification or deletion of existing data. */ #define CMD_KEY_DELETE (1ULL<<7) /* Explicitly deletes some content * from the value of the key. */ ``` Unrelated changes: - generate-command-code.py is only compatible with python3 (modified the shabang) - generate-command-code.py print file on json parsing error - rename `shard_channel` key-spec flag to just `channel`. - add INCOMPLETE flag in input spec of SORT and SORT_RO
* Add missing metadata to the commands SSOT files. (#10016)Itamar Haber2021-12-291-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add missing information about commands, mainly from reviewing redis-doc and removing the metadata from it (https://github.com/redis/redis-doc/pull/1722) * Reintroduces CLUSTER S****S (supported by Redis) but missing from the JSON / docs (related? #9675). Note that without that json file, the command won't work (breaking change) * Adds the `replicas` argument (exists in Redis) to `CLIENT KILL`. * Adds `history` entries to several commands based on redis-doc's man pages. * Adds `since` to applicable command arguments based on `history` (this basically makes some of `history` redundant - perhaps at a later stage). * Uses proper semantic versioning in all version references. * Also removes `geoencodeCommand` and `geodecodeCommand` header declarations per b96af595a5fddbbdcbf78ed3c51acd60976416f4.
* Auto-generate the command table from JSON files (#9656)guybe72021-12-151-0/+83
Delete the hardcoded command table and replace it with an auto-generated table, based on a JSON file that describes the commands (each command must have a JSON file). These JSON files are the SSOT of everything there is to know about Redis commands, and it is reflected fully in COMMAND INFO. These JSON files are used to generate commands.c (using a python script), which is then committed to the repo and compiled. The purpose is: * Clients and proxies will be able to get much more info from redis, instead of relying on hard coded logic. * drop the dependency between Redis-user and the commands.json in redis-doc. * delete help.h and have redis-cli learn everything it needs to know just by issuing COMMAND (will be done in a separate PR) * redis.io should stop using commands.json and learn everything from Redis (ultimately one of the release artifacts should be a large JSON, containing all the information about all of the commands, which will be generated from COMMAND's reply) * the byproduct of this is: * module commands will be able to provide that info and possibly be more of a first-class citizens * in theory, one may be able to generate a redis client library for a strictly typed language, by using this info. ### Interface changes #### COMMAND INFO's reply change (and arg-less COMMAND) Before this commit the reply at index 7 contained the key-specs list and reply at index 8 contained the sub-commands list (Both unreleased). Now, reply at index 7 is a map of: - summary - short command description - since - debut version - group - command group - complexity - complexity string - doc-flags - flags used for documentation (e.g. "deprecated") - deprecated-since - if deprecated, from which version? - replaced-by - if deprecated, which command replaced it? - history - a list of (version, what-changed) tuples - hints - a list of strings, meant to provide hints for clients/proxies. see https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9876 - arguments - an array of arguments. each element is a map, with the possibility of nesting (sub-arguments) - key-specs - an array of keys specs (already in unstable, just changed location) - subcommands - a list of sub-commands (already in unstable, just changed location) - reply-schema - will be added in the future (see https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9845) more details on these can be found in https://github.com/redis/redis-doc/pull/1697 only the first three fields are mandatory #### API changes (unreleased API obviously) now they take RedisModuleCommand opaque pointer instead of looking up the command by name - RM_CreateSubcommand - RM_AddCommandKeySpec - RM_SetCommandKeySpecBeginSearchIndex - RM_SetCommandKeySpecBeginSearchKeyword - RM_SetCommandKeySpecFindKeysRange - RM_SetCommandKeySpecFindKeysKeynum Currently, we did not add module API to provide additional information about their commands because we couldn't agree on how the API should look like, see https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9944. ### Somehow related changes 1. Literals should be in uppercase while placeholder in lowercase. Now all the GEO* command will be documented with M|KM|FT|MI and can take both lowercase and uppercase ### Unrelated changes 1. Bugfix: no_madaory_keys was absent in COMMAND's reply 2. expose CMD_MODULE as "module" via COMMAND 3. have a dedicated uint64 for ACL categories (instead of having them in the same uint64 as command flags) Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@garantiadata.com>