diff options
| author | Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org> | 2023-01-31 11:46:25 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2023-01-31 11:46:25 +0900 |
| commit | f95f835470f1c5b295d2486259e745eb8e859344 (patch) | |
| tree | 9b745562e3fba358ced07abe7b0b214d1f594a0a /tests/rustdoc-js-std/parser-errors.js | |
| parent | fbcaf046cc49b8fcb7af96b64293301be6936fad (diff) | |
| parent | 343a359109a48f4ece657831bf0331e22d108800 (diff) | |
| download | rust-f95f835470f1c5b295d2486259e745eb8e859344.tar.gz | |
Rollup merge of #107479 - compiler-errors:probe-can-call-ocx, r=BoxyUwU
Use `ObligationCtxt::new_in_snapshot` in `satisfied_from_param_env`
We can evaluate nested `ConstEvaluatable` obligations in an evaluation probe, which will ICE if we use `ObligationCtxt::new`.
Fixes #107474
Fixes #106666
r? `@BoxyUwU` but feel free to reassign
cc `@JulianKnodt` who i think added this assertion code
Not sure if the rustdoc test is needed, but can't hurt. They're the same root cause, though.
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/rustdoc-js-std/parser-errors.js')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions