summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>2022-06-09 12:15:46 +0200
committerZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>2022-06-09 13:22:48 +0200
commitdb82e667c7b52b8ff75d2cfc071d275a831bc915 (patch)
tree782f2a9eb5e4901e95195ec3c5e20d7dacf6e835
parent2299b1cae32c1fb8911da0ce26efced68032f4f8 (diff)
downloadsystemd-db82e667c7b52b8ff75d2cfc071d275a831bc915.tar.gz
docs/BLS: move "boot counting" into the main spec
The boot-counting file-renaming entry-sorting part that the boot loader implements is moved to the main document. The second document describes a specific implementation that is provided through systemd units. The sorting algorithm is extended to say that bad entries should be sorted later. I also added a note that bad entries should be available for booting. For some reason, the second document said that it applies only to EFI systems. AFAIK there are no implementations for non-EFI, but the specification should work just fine, if somebody were to implement it. So that part is dropped. Fixes #23345. Sadly, bootctl doesn't implement sorting of boot entries with counting :(((( But I'm leaving that for another PR.
-rw-r--r--docs/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT.md95
-rw-r--r--docs/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md86
2 files changed, 118 insertions, 63 deletions
diff --git a/docs/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT.md b/docs/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT.md
index 2e015eab37..59cae4754a 100644
--- a/docs/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT.md
+++ b/docs/AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT.md
@@ -8,14 +8,17 @@ SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later
# Automatic Boot Assessment
systemd provides support for automatically reverting back to the previous
-version of the OS or kernel in case the system consistently fails to boot. This
-support is built into various of its components. When used together these
-components provide a complete solution on UEFI systems, built as add-on to the
-[Boot Loader Specification](BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md).
-However, the different components may also be used independently, and in
-combination with other software, to implement similar schemes, for example with
-other boot loaders or for non-UEFI systems. Here's a brief overview of the
-complete set of components:
+version of the OS or kernel in case the system consistently fails to boot. The
+[Boot Loader Specification](BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md#boot-counting)
+describes how to annotate boot loader entries with a counter that specifies how
+many attempts should be made to boot it. This document describes how systemd
+implements this scheme.
+
+The many different components involved in the implementation may be used
+independently and in combination with other software to for example support
+other boot loaders or take actions outside of the boot loader.
+
+Here's a brief overview of the complete set of components:
* The
[`systemd-boot(7)`](https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-boot.html)
@@ -57,38 +60,36 @@ complete set of components:
## Details
-The boot counting data `systemd-boot` and `systemd-bless-boot.service`
-manage is stored in the name of the boot loader entries. If a boot loader entry
-file name contains `+` followed by one or two numbers (if two numbers, then
-those need to be separated by `-`) right before the `.conf` suffix, then boot
-counting is enabled for it. The first number is the "tries left" counter
-encoding how many attempts to boot this entry shall still be made. The second
-number is the "tries done" counter, encoding how many failed attempts to boot
-it have already been made. Each time a boot loader entry marked this way is
-booted the first counter is decreased by one, and the second one increased by
-one. (If the second counter is missing, then it is assumed to be equivalent to
-zero.) If the "tries left" counter is above zero the entry is still considered
-for booting (the entry's state is considered to be "indeterminate"), as soon as
-it reached zero the entry is not tried anymore (entry state "bad"). If the boot
-attempt completed successfully the entry's counters are removed from the name
-(entry state "good"), thus turning off boot counting for the future.
+As described in [Boot Loader Specification](BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md#boot-counting),
+the boot counting data is stored in the file name of the boot loader entries as
+a plus (`+`), followed by a number, optionally followed by `-` and another
+number, right before the file name suffix (`.conf` or `.efi`).
+
+The first number is the "tries left" counter encoding how many attempts to boot
+this entry shall still be made. The second number is the "tries done" counter,
+encoding how many failed attempts to boot it have already been made. Each time
+a boot loader entry marked this way is booted the first counter is decremented,
+and the second one incremented. (If the second counter is missing, then it is
+assumed to be equivalent to zero.) If the boot attempt completed successfully
+the entry's counters are removed from the name (entry state "good"), thus
+turning off boot counting for the future.
## Walkthrough
Here's an example walkthrough of how this all fits together.
-1. The user runs `echo 3 > /etc/kernel/tries` to enable boot counting.
+1. The user runs `echo 3 >/etc/kernel/tries` to enable boot counting.
2. A new kernel is installed. `kernel-install` is used to generate a new boot
loader entry file for it. Let's say the version string for the new kernel is
`4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64`, a new boot loader entry
`/boot/loader/entries/4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64+3.conf` is hence created.
-3. The system is booted for the first time after the new kernel is
+3. The system is booted for the first time after the new kernel has been
installed. The boot loader now sees the `+3` counter in the entry file
name. It hence renames the file to `4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64+2-1.conf`
- indicating that at this point one attempt has started and thus only one less
- is left. After the rename completed the entry is booted as usual.
+ indicating that at this point one attempt has started.
+ After the rename completed, the entry is booted as usual.
4. Let's say this attempt to boot fails. On the following boot the boot loader
will hence see the `+2-1` tag in the name, and hence rename the entry file to
@@ -98,11 +99,11 @@ Here's an example walkthrough of how this all fits together.
see the `+1-2` tag, and rename the file to
`4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64+0-3.conf` and boot it.
-6. If this boot also fails, on the next boot the boot loader will see the
- tag `+0-3`, i.e. the counter reached zero. At this point the entry will be
- considered "bad", and ordered to the beginning of the list of entries. The
- next newest boot entry is now tried, i.e. the system automatically reverted
- back to an earlier version.
+6. If this boot also fails, on the next boot the boot loader will see the tag
+ `+0-3`, i.e. the counter reached zero. At this point the entry will be
+ considered "bad", and ordered after all non-bad entries. The next newest
+ boot entry is now tried, i.e. the system automatically reverted to an
+ earlier version.
The above describes the walkthrough when the selected boot entry continuously
fails. Let's have a look at an alternative ending to this walkthrough. In this
@@ -143,7 +144,7 @@ scenario the first 4 steps are the same as above:
renames it dropping the counter tag. Thus
`4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64+1-2.conf` is renamed to
`4.14.11-300.fc27.x86_64.conf`. From this moment boot counting is turned
- off.
+ off for this entry.
12. On the following boot (and all subsequent boots after that) the entry is
now seen with boot counting turned off, no further renaming takes place.
@@ -156,9 +157,9 @@ are a couple of recommendations.
1. To support alternative boot loaders in place of `systemd-boot` two scenarios
are recommended:
- a. Boot loaders already implementing the Boot Loader Specification can simply
- implement an equivalent file rename based logic, and thus integrate fully
- with the rest of the stack.
+ a. Boot loaders already implementing the Boot Loader Specification can
+ simply implement the same rename logic, and thus integrate fully with
+ the rest of the stack.
b. Boot loaders that want to implement boot counting and store the counters
elsewhere can provide their own replacements for
@@ -181,27 +182,11 @@ are a couple of recommendations.
## FAQ
-1. *Why do you use file renames to store the counter? Why not a regular file?*
- — Mainly two reasons: it's relatively likely that renames can be implemented
- atomically even in simpler file systems, while writing to file contents has
- a much bigger chance to be result in incomplete or corrupt data, as renaming
- generally avoids allocating or releasing data blocks. Moreover it has the
- benefit that the boot count metadata is directly attached to the boot loader
- entry file, and thus the lifecycle of the metadata and the entry itself are
- bound together. This means no additional clean-up needs to take place to
- drop the boot loader counting information for an entry when it is removed.
-
-2. *Why not use EFI variables for storing the boot counter?* — The memory chips
- used to back the persistent EFI variables are generally not of the highest
- quality, hence shouldn't be written to more than necessary. This means we
- can't really use it for changes made regularly during boot, but can use it
- only for seldom made configuration changes.
-
-3. *I have a service which — when it fails — should immediately cause a
- reboot. How does that fit in with the above?* — Well, that's orthogonal to
+1. *I have a service which — when it fails — should immediately cause a
+ reboot. How does that fit in with the above?* — That's orthogonal to
the above, please use `FailureAction=` in the unit file for this.
-4. *Under some condition I want to mark the current boot loader entry as bad
+2. *Under some condition I want to mark the current boot loader entry as bad
right-away, so that it never is tried again, how do I do that?* — You may
invoke `/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-bless-boot bad` at any time to mark the
current boot loader entry as "bad" right-away so that it isn't tried again
diff --git a/docs/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md b/docs/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md
index 805c1da031..8a6a16c63f 100644
--- a/docs/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md
+++ b/docs/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION.md
@@ -391,25 +391,77 @@ creating a partition and file system for it) and creates the `/loader/entries/`
directory in it. It then installs an appropriate boot loader that can read
these snippets. Finally, it installs one or more kernel packages.
+## Boot counting
+
+The main idea is that when boot entries are initially installed, they are
+marked as "indeterminate" and assigned a number of boot attempts. Each time the
+boot loader tries to boot an entry, it decreases this count by one. If the
+operating system considers the boot as successful, it removes the counter
+altogether and the entry becomes "good". Otherwise, once the assigned number of
+boots is exhausted, the entry is marked as "bad".
+
+Which boots are "successful" is determined by the operating system. systemd
+provides a generic mechanism that can be extended with arbitrary checks and
+actions, see [Automatic Boot Assesment](AUTOMATIC_BOOT_ASSESSMENT.md), but the
+boot counting mechanism described in this specifaction can also be used with
+other implementations.
+
+The boot counting data is stored in the name of the boot loader entry. A boot
+loader entry file name may contain a plus (`+`) followed by a number. This may
+optionally be followed by a minus (`-`) followed by a second number. The dot
+(`.`) and file name suffix (`conf` of `efi`) must immediately follow. Boot
+counting is enabled for entries which match this pattern.
+
+The first number is the "tries left" counter signifying how many attempts to boot
+this entry shall still be made. The second number is the "tries done" counter,
+showing how many failed attempts to boot it have already been made. Each time
+a boot loader entry marked this way is booted, the first counter is decremented,
+and the second one incremented. (If the second counter is missing,
+then it is assumed to be equivalent to zero.) If the "tries left" counter is
+above zero the entry is still considered "indeterminate". A boot entry with the
+"tries left" counter at zero is considered "bad".
+
+If the boot attempt completed successfully the entry's counters are removed
+from the name (entry state becomes "good"), thus turning off boot counting for
+this entry.
+
## Sorting
The boot loader menu should generally show entries in some order meaningful to
the user. The `title` key is free-form and not suitable to be used as the
primary sorting key. Instead, the boot loader should use the following rules:
-if `sort-key` is set on both entries, use in order of priority,
-the `sort-key` (A-Z, increasing [alphanumerical order](#alphanumerical-order)),
-`machine-id` (A-Z, increasing alphanumerical order),
-and `version` keys (decreasing [version order](#version-order)).
-If `sort-key` is set on one entry, it sorts earlier.
-At the end, if necessary, when `sort-key` is not set or those fields are not
-set or are all equal, the boot loader should sort using the file name of the
-entry (decreasing version sort), with the suffix removed.
+
+1. Entries which are subject to boot counting and are marked as "bad", should
+ be sorted later than all other entries. Entries which are marked as
+ "indeterminate" or "good" (or were not subject to boot counting at all),
+ are thus sorted earlier.
+
+2. If `sort-key` is set on both entries, use in order of priority,
+ the `sort-key` (A-Z, increasing [alphanumerical order](#alphanumerical-order)),
+ `machine-id` (A-Z, increasing alphanumerical order),
+ and `version` keys (decreasing [version order](#version-order)).
+
+3. If `sort-key` is set on one entry, it sorts earlier.
+
+4. At the end, if necessary, when `sort-key` is not set or those fields are not
+ set or are all equal, the boot loader should sort using the file name of the
+ entry (decreasing version sort), with the suffix removed.
**Note:** _This description assumes that the boot loader shows entries in a
traditional menu, with newest and "best" entries at the top, thus entries with
a higher version number are sorter *earlier*. The boot loader is free to
use a different direction (or none at all) during display._
+**Note:** _The boot loader should allow booting "bad" entries, e.g. in case no
+other entries are left or they are unusable for other reasons. It may
+deemphasize or hide such entries by default._
+
+**Note:** _"Bad" boot entries have a suffix of "+0-`n`", where `n` is the
+number of failed boot attempts. Removal of the suffix is not necessary for
+comparisons described by the last point above. In the unlikely scenario that we
+have multiple such boot entries that differ only by the boot counting data, we
+would sort them by `n`._
+
### Alphanumerical order
Free-form strings and machine IDs should be compared using a method equivalent
@@ -574,6 +626,24 @@ to have them in reverse order. But when multiple kernels are available for the
same installation, we want to display the latest kernel with highest priority,
i.e. earlier in the list.
+### Why do you use file renames to store the counter? Why not a regular file?
+
+Mainly two reasons: it's relatively likely that renames can be implemented
+atomically even in simpler file systems, as renaming generally avoids
+allocating or releasing data blocks. Writing to file contents has a much bigger
+chance to be result in incomplete or corrupt data. Moreover renaming has the
+benefit that the boot count metadata is directly attached to the boot loader
+entry file, and thus the lifecycle of the metadata and the entry itself are
+bound together. This means no additional clean-up needs to take place to drop
+the boot loader counting information for an entry when it is removed.
+
+### Why not use EFI variables for storing the boot counter?
+
+The memory chips used to back the persistent EFI variables are generally not of
+the highest quality, hence shouldn't be written to more than necessary. This
+means we can't really use it for changes made regularly during boot, but should
+use it only for seldom-made configuration changes.
+
### Out of Focus
There are a couple of items that are out of focus for this specification: