summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/libsystemd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>2015-06-23 10:47:44 +0200
committerDavid Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>2015-06-24 13:45:56 +0200
commit12b7dff45b0e2442355008a1e53f1211bd227147 (patch)
tree88d3cc7f2c2dce683630d13205dae4bf0e0f5b13 /src/libsystemd
parent979e7eb9cc3376f23c08054b4e5987f5874377e5 (diff)
downloadsystemd-12b7dff45b0e2442355008a1e53f1211bd227147.tar.gz
sd-netlink: make sure the root-level type is nested
In sd-netlink-message, we always guarantee that the currently selected type-system is non-NULL. Otherwise, we would be unable to parse any types in the current container level. Hence, this assertion must be true: message->container_type_system[m->n_containers] != NULL During message_new() we currently do not verify that this assertion is true. Instead, we blindly access nl_type->type_system and use it (which might be NULL for basic types and unions). Fix this, by explicitly checking that the root-level type is nested. Note that this is *not* a strict requirement of netlink, but it's a strict requirement for all message types we currently support. Furthermore, all the callers of message_new() already verify that only supported types are passed, therefore, this is a pure cosmetic check. However, it might be needed on the future, so make sure we don't trap into this once we change the type-system.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/libsystemd')
-rw-r--r--src/libsystemd/sd-netlink/netlink-message.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/libsystemd/sd-netlink/netlink-message.c b/src/libsystemd/sd-netlink/netlink-message.c
index bfbc0e6c95..e39e4c646c 100644
--- a/src/libsystemd/sd-netlink/netlink-message.c
+++ b/src/libsystemd/sd-netlink/netlink-message.c
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ int message_new(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message **ret, uint16_t type) {
if (r < 0)
return r;
+ if (type_get_type(nl_type) != NETLINK_TYPE_NESTED)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
r = message_new_empty(rtnl, &m);
if (r < 0)
return r;
@@ -85,8 +88,7 @@ int message_new(sd_netlink *rtnl, sd_netlink_message **ret, uint16_t type) {
m->hdr->nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK;
- if (type_get_type(nl_type) == NETLINK_TYPE_NESTED)
- type_get_type_system(nl_type, &m->container_type_system[0]);
+ type_get_type_system(nl_type, &m->container_type_system[0]);
m->hdr->nlmsg_len = size;
m->hdr->nlmsg_type = type;