summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/resolve
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Pitt <martin.pitt@ubuntu.com>2016-09-30 09:30:08 +0200
committerZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>2016-09-30 09:30:08 +0200
commitb9fe94cad99968a58e169592d999306fd059eb14 (patch)
treed791e9c45716a8842338f0ec4ac3562b79dfc751 /src/resolve
parenta86b76753d7868c2d05f046f601bc7dc89fc2203 (diff)
downloadsystemd-b9fe94cad99968a58e169592d999306fd059eb14.tar.gz
resolved: don't query domain-limited DNS servers for other domains (#3621)
DNS servers which have route-only domains should only be used for the specified domains. Routing queries about other domains there is a privacy violation, prone to fail (as that DNS server was not meant to be used for other domains), and puts unnecessary load onto that server. Introduce a new helper function dns_server_limited_domains() that checks if the DNS server should only be used for some selected domains, i. e. has some route-only domains without "~.". Use that when determining whether to query it in the scope, and when writing resolv.conf. Extend the test_route_only_dns() case to ensure that the DNS server limited to ~company does not appear in resolv.conf. Add test_route_only_dns_all_domains() to ensure that a server that also has ~. does appear in resolv.conf as global name server. These reproduce #3420. Add a new test_resolved_domain_restricted_dns() test case that verifies that domain-limited DNS servers are only being used for those domains. This reproduces #3421. Clarify what a "routing domain" is in the manpage. Fixes #3420 Fixes #3421
Diffstat (limited to 'src/resolve')
-rw-r--r--src/resolve/resolved-dns-scope.c8
-rw-r--r--src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.c21
-rw-r--r--src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.h2
-rw-r--r--src/resolve/resolved-resolv-conf.c10
4 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-scope.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-scope.c
index ed0c6aa105..03811ac8e7 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-scope.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-scope.c
@@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ int dns_scope_socket_tcp(DnsScope *s, int family, const union in_addr_union *add
DnsScopeMatch dns_scope_good_domain(DnsScope *s, int ifindex, uint64_t flags, const char *domain) {
DnsSearchDomain *d;
+ DnsServer *dns_server;
assert(s);
assert(domain);
@@ -447,6 +448,13 @@ DnsScopeMatch dns_scope_good_domain(DnsScope *s, int ifindex, uint64_t flags, co
if (dns_name_endswith(domain, d->name) > 0)
return DNS_SCOPE_YES;
+ /* If the DNS server has route-only domains, don't send other requests
+ * to it. This would be a privacy violation, will most probably fail
+ * anyway, and adds unnecessary load. */
+ dns_server = dns_scope_get_dns_server(s);
+ if (dns_server && dns_server_limited_domains(dns_server))
+ return DNS_SCOPE_NO;
+
switch (s->protocol) {
case DNS_PROTOCOL_DNS:
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.c b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.c
index 9b7b471600..97cc8c0e09 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.c
@@ -576,6 +576,27 @@ void dns_server_warn_downgrade(DnsServer *server) {
server->warned_downgrade = true;
}
+bool dns_server_limited_domains(DnsServer *server)
+{
+ DnsSearchDomain *domain;
+ bool domain_restricted = false;
+
+ /* Check if the server has route-only domains without ~., i. e. whether
+ * it should only be used for particular domains */
+ if (!server->link)
+ return false;
+
+ LIST_FOREACH(domains, domain, server->link->search_domains)
+ if (domain->route_only) {
+ domain_restricted = true;
+ /* ~. means "any domain", thus it is a global server */
+ if (streq(DNS_SEARCH_DOMAIN_NAME(domain), "."))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return domain_restricted;
+}
+
static void dns_server_hash_func(const void *p, struct siphash *state) {
const DnsServer *s = p;
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.h b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.h
index c1732faffd..83e288a202 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.h
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-dns-server.h
@@ -128,6 +128,8 @@ bool dns_server_dnssec_supported(DnsServer *server);
void dns_server_warn_downgrade(DnsServer *server);
+bool dns_server_limited_domains(DnsServer *server);
+
DnsServer *dns_server_find(DnsServer *first, int family, const union in_addr_union *in_addr, int ifindex);
void dns_server_unlink_all(DnsServer *first);
diff --git a/src/resolve/resolved-resolv-conf.c b/src/resolve/resolved-resolv-conf.c
index 31b25ca50f..801014caf5 100644
--- a/src/resolve/resolved-resolv-conf.c
+++ b/src/resolve/resolved-resolv-conf.c
@@ -154,6 +154,16 @@ static void write_resolv_conf_server(DnsServer *s, FILE *f, unsigned *count) {
return;
}
+ /* Check if the DNS server is limited to particular domains;
+ * resolv.conf does not have a syntax to express that, so it must not
+ * appear as a global name server to avoid routing unrelated domains to
+ * it (which is a privacy violation, will most probably fail anyway,
+ * and adds unnecessary load) */
+ if (dns_server_limited_domains(s)) {
+ log_debug("DNS server %s has route-only domains, not using as global name server", dns_server_string(s));
+ return;
+ }
+
if (*count == MAXNS)
fputs("# Too many DNS servers configured, the following entries may be ignored.\n", f);
(*count)++;