| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's a sycall group of our own definition, and the output is erroneous
to claim otherwise. Let's hide it.
This adds syscall_set_add() which is nicely symmetric to the existing
syscall_set_remove().
Follow-up for: 6d6a08547c03f96dc798cda1ef4a8d3013d292d5
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
No functional change is intended. The verbs where it wasn't immediately
clear if the success exit status is 0 or >= 0 are changed to explicitly
return 0. (I think it's better to be explicit than to rely on some call
stack always returning 0 on success.)
Some other functions are cleaned up to be more idiomatic.
|
| |
|
|
| |
This also avoids multiple evaluations in STRV_FOREACH_BACKWARDS()
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Follow-up for #22585
See: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/22585#issuecomment-1047658990
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Some of the functions so far were named do_xyz(), others dump_xyz() and
even others test_xyz(). let's instead name them exactly like the verb
exposed in the command line, just prefixed with verb_
|
| |
|
