| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In various tools and services we have a per-system and per-user concept.
So far we sometimes used a boolean indicating whether we are in system
mode, or a reversed boolean indicating whether we are in user mode, or
the LookupScope enum used by the lookup path logic.
Let's address that, in introduce a common enum for this, we can use all
across the board.
This is mostly just search/replace, no actual code changes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a leak reported at https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26115#issuecomment-1398026085.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Define new unit parameter (LogFilterPatterns) to filter logs processed by
journald.
This option is used to store a regular expression which is carried from
PID1 to systemd-journald through a cgroup xattrs:
`user.journald_log_filter_patterns`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
When building in a chroot there might not be any machine-id
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- shorter is better
- name now matches the defining-file name
I was also considering UnitInstallInfo. Can change if people prefer that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a bug introduced by 065364920281e1cf59cab989e17aff21790505c4.
Fixes #22957.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As suggested in
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/22649/commits/8b3ad3983f5440eef812b34e5ed862ca59fdf7f7#r837345892
The define is generalized and moved to path-lookup.h, where it seems to fit
better. This allows a recursive include to be removed and in general makes
things simpler.
|
|
|
|
| |
All callers were just passing info + info->root, we can simplify this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We would resolve those specifiers to the calling user/group. This is mostly OK
when done in the manager, because the manager generally operates as root
in system mode, and a non-root in user mode. It would still be wrong if
called with --test though. But in systemctl, this would be generally wrong,
since we can call 'systemctl --system' as a normal user, either for testing
or even for actual operation with '--root=…'.
When operating in --global mode, %u/%U/%g/%G should return an error.
The information whether we're operating in system mode, user mode, or global
mode is passed as the data pointer to specifier_group_name(), specifier_user_name(),
specifier_group_id(), specifier_user_id(). We can't use userdata, because
it's already used for other things.
|
|
|
|
| |
Addresses https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/22338#discussion_r796741033.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
C macros are nasty. We use them, but we try to be conservative with
them. In particular passing literal, complex code blocks as argument is
icky, because of "," handling of C, and also because it's quite a
challange for most code highlighters and similar. Hence, let's avoid
that. Using macros for genreating functions is OK but if so, the
parameters should be simple words, not full code blocks.
hence, rework DEFINE_CUSTOM_TEST_MAIN() to take a function name instead
of code block as argument.
As side-effect this also fixes a bunch of cases where we might end up
returning a negative value from main().
Some uses of DEFINE_CUSTOM_TEST_MAIN() inserted local variables into the
main() functions, these are replaced by static variables, and their
destructors by the static destructor logic.
This doesn't fix any bugs or so, it's just supposed to make the code
easier to work with and improve it easthetically.
Or in other words: let's use macros where it really makes sense, but
let's not go overboard with it.
(And yes, FOREACH_DIRENT() is another one of those macros that take
code, and I dislike that too and regret I ever added that.)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note that test-cgroup-mask, test-cgroup-unit-default and test-unit-name will now
report being skipped instead of reporting success if not run under systemd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To prevent situations like in #17602 from happening, let's drop
direct recursive template dependencies. These will almost certainly
lead to infinite recursion so let's drop them immediately to avoid
instantiating potentially thousands of irrelevant units.
Example of a template that would lead to infinite recursion which
is caught by this check:
notify@.service:
```
[Unit]
Wants=notify@%n.service
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example Run:
foobar.service created below is a service unit file that has a non-existing key-value
pairing (foo = bar) and is thus, syntactically invalid.
maanya-goenka@debian:~/systemd (img-support)$ cat <<EOF>img/usr/lib/systemd/system/foobar.service
> [Unit]
> foo = bar
>
> [Service]
> ExecStart = /opt/script0.sh
> EOF
The failure to create foobar.service because of the recursive dependency searching and verification has been addressed
in a different PR: systemd-analyze: add option to return an error value when unit verification fails #20233
maanya-goenka@debian:~/systemd (img-support)$ sudo build/systemd-analyze verify --root=img/ foobar.service
/home/maanya-goenka/systemd/img/usr/lib/systemd/system/foobar.service:2: Unknown key name 'foo' in section 'Unit', ignoring.
foobar.service: Failed to create foobar.service/start: Unit sysinit.target not found.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes repart's, systemctl's, sysusers' and tmpfiles' specifier
expansion to honour the root dir specified with --root=. This is
relevant for specifiers such as %m, %o, … which are directly sourced
from files on disk.
This doesn't try to be overly smart: specifiers referring to runtime
concepts (i.e. boot ID, architecture, hostname) rather than files on the
medium are left as is. There's certainly a point to be made that they
should fail in case --root= is specified, but I am not entirely convinced
about that, and it's certainly something we can look into later if
there's reason to.
I wondered for a while how to hook this up best, but given that quite a
large number of specifiers resolve to data from files on disks, and most
of our tools needs this, I ultimately decided to make the root dir a
first class parameter to specifier_printf().
Replaces: #16187
Fixes: #16183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We usually call specifier_printf() and then check the validity of
the result. In many cases, validity checkers, e.g. path_is_valid(),
refuse too long strings. This makes specifier_printf() refuse such
long results earlier.
Moreover, unit_full_string() and description field in sysuser now
refuse results longer than LONG_LINE_MAX. config_parse() already
refuses the line longer than LONG_LINE_MAX. Hence, it should be ok
to set the same value as the maximum length of the resolved string.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
allowed"
This reverts commit b45c068dd8fac7661a15e99e7cf699ff06010b13.
I think the idea was generally sound, but didn't take into account the
limitations of show-environment and how it is used. People expect to be able to
eval systemctl show-environment output in bash, and no escaping syntax is
defined for environment *names* (we only do escaping for *values*). We could
skip such problematic variables in 'systemctl show-environment', and only allow
them to be inherited directly. But this would be confusing and ugly.
The original motivation for this change was that various import operations
would fail. a4ccce22d9552dc74b6916cc5ec57f2a0b686b4f changed systemctl to filter
invalid variables in import-environment.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-session/-/issues/71 does a similar change
in GNOME. So those problematic variables should not cause failures, but just
be silently ignored.
Finally, the environment block is becoming a dumping ground. In my gnome
session 'systemctl show-environment --user' includes stuff like PWD, FPATH
(from zsh), SHLVL=0 (no idea what that is). This is not directly related to
variable names (since all those are allowed under the stricter rules too), but
I think we should start pushing people away from running import-environment and
towards importing only select variables.
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17188#issuecomment-708676511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There was some confusion about what POSIX says about variable names:
names shall not contain the character '='. For values to be portable
across systems conforming to POSIX.1-2008, the value shall be composed
of characters from the portable character set (except NUL and as
indicated below).
i.e. it allows almost all ASCII in variable names (without NUL and DEL and
'='). OTOH, it says that *utilities* use a smaller set of characters:
Environment variable names used by the utilities in the Shell and
Utilities volume of POSIX.1-2008 consist solely of uppercase letters,
digits, and the <underscore> ( '_' ) from the characters defined in
Portable Character Set and do not begin with a digit.
When enforcing variable names in environment blocks, we need to use this
first definition, so that we can propagate all valid variables.
I think having non-printable characters in variable names is too much, so
I took out the whitespace stuff from the first definition.
OTOH, when we use *shell syntax*, for example doing variable expansion,
it seems enough to support expansion of variables that the shell would allow.
Fixes #14878,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754395,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879216.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We had a special test case that the second semicolon would be interpreted
as an executable name. We would then try to find the executable and rely
on ";" not being found to cause ENOEXEC to be returned. I think that's just
crazy. Let's treat the second semicolon as a separator and ignore the
whole thing as we would whitespace.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This covers parsing from configuration files only. Properties set via
DBus have separate code path whose testing would require DBus setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The conf-parser machinery already removed whitespace before and after "=", no
need to repeat this step.
The test is adjusted to pass. It was testing an code path that doesn't happen
normally, no point in doing that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't think there's any particular reason to keep those functions in a separate
file.
|
|
|
|
| |
There is nothing magic in it.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
This file was testing a mix of functions from src/core/load-fragment.c and some
from src/shared/install.c. Let's name it more appropriately. I want to add
tests for the new unit-file.c too.
|