1 files changed, 0 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.10/809-v5.19-0007-nvmem-qfprom-using-pm_runtime_resume_and_get-instead.patch b/target/linux/generic/backport-5.10/809-v5.19-0007-nvmem-qfprom-using-pm_runtime_resume_and_get-instead.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index cd51d97006..0000000000
--- a/target/linux/generic/backport-5.10/809-v5.19-0007-nvmem-qfprom-using-pm_runtime_resume_and_get-instead.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-From 517f6e2641a2802dce5a5aa0d18c7d37a35678d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:26:54 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of
- pm_runtime_get_sync
-
-Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
-for simplifing code
-
-Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
-Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
-Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
-Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220429162701.2222-10-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
-Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
----
- drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 +--
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
---- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
-+++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
-@@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(co
- 		goto err_clk_rate_set;
- 	}
- 
--	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
-+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev);
- 	if (ret < 0) {
--		pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev);
- 		dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n");
- 		goto err_reg_enable;
- 	}