Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | fix elif-used rule | Laura M?dioni | 2015-11-30 | 1 | -18/+4 |
| | | | | The bug was introduced when porting the rule from pylint core to an extension | ||||
* | pylint extension to check for use of "else if" instead of "elsif" | Laura M?dioni | 2015-11-27 | 1 | -0/+76 |
| | | | | related to issue #673 | ||||
* | Use the new node names for the visit and leave methods | Claudiu Popa | 2015-08-26 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | Also, emit a PendingDeprecationWarning if the old names are still used, this support being removed in pylint 2.0. | ||||
* | Cleanup. | Claudiu Popa | 2015-05-11 | 1 | -35/+27 |
| | |||||
* | Change the name of the parameter checker, so that it can be chosen easily at ↵ | Claudiu Popa | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | command line. | ||||
* | Move extensions/test to pylint.test, so they could be tested along with the ↵ | Claudiu Popa | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -644/+0 |
| | | | | rest of the tests. | ||||
* | further unit test for space_indentation | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | |||||
* | method visit_class is no longer necessary in the checker; auxiliary method ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 2 | -17/+18 |
| | | | | _visit_methods_of_class in the unit test | ||||
* | check_docs: Handle class constructors from within visit_function. | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -10/+17 |
| | |||||
* | accept-no-param-doc turned into a yes/no option; documentation for this ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -2/+1 |
| | | | | parameter | ||||
* | unit test for the option accept_no_param_doc | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -1/+26 |
| | |||||
* | check_docs: implementation of option "accept-no-param-doc" | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -2/+10 |
| | |||||
* | pylint documentation: Demonstrate parameter documentation checking for ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | Google and Numpy style as well. | ||||
* | better naming, because the checker now supports not just the Sphinx style | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 2 | -58/+57 |
| | |||||
* | unit test for constructor parameter documentation in Google and Numpy style | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -1/+68 |
| | |||||
* | unit test for see sentence in Google and Numpy style docstring | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -2/+42 |
| | |||||
* | unit test for wrong names of function params in Google and numpy style ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -2/+110 |
| | | | | docstrings | ||||
* | unit tests for correctly documented parameters and return values (all 3 styles) | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -2/+53 |
| | |||||
* | unit tests for Google and Numpy style in class methods | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -2/+62 |
| | |||||
* | unit test for Numpy style parameter documentation; improvements of other ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 1 | -9/+40 |
| | | | | unit tests | ||||
* | unittest for Google style parameter documentation; first implementation of ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-10 | 2 | -33/+170 |
| | | | | Google and numpy style parameter documentation | ||||
* | documentation | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-08 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | |||||
* | check_docs: Emit error messages only when it detects that at least one ↵ | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-08 | 1 | -1/+10 |
| | | | | :param: definition is found? In that case, we will actually know that the user intended to use Sphinx style documentation or not. | ||||
* | Tolerate no Sphinx parameter documentation at all: unit test | Bruno Daniel | 2015-05-08 | 3 | -0/+418 |